Surprised Yahtzee didn't make more mention of Elizabeth in his review; perhaps he's saving her (and her role as a likable companion AI) for a column. Definitely agree with the Vigour's criticism and some of the other gameplay nit-picks as well as his observation that Comstock is less interesting than Andrew Ryan (but then Comstock is not only one side to the same coin, his ideology is simply less interesting). However Yahtzee provides very little justification for his whole 'stuck up your own butt' or 'hairy space hopper levels of pretension' (great phrases nonetheless) criticisms. I'd like to hear why he thought it was pretentious as opposed to him simply stating the fact; you might call the concepts and issues the game is juggling heady and 'serious', but it utilises and presents them in an extremely understandable and accessible way (at least after some reflection and thought; it wouldn't be very engaging if these elements could be grasped instantaneously).
I suppose Yahtzee did identify one possible point of pretentiousness, 'abstract meta-narrative', but it's not like the games story doesn't work without it, it's simply another layer of complexity and depth and oh no, I sound pretentious don't I? Well damnit I guess that sort of meta-commentary, when done in the more subtle way as it is in Infinite, is simply fascinating to me and I guess I'll just live with the 'pretentious' label used by those who don't really give a crap about it, and that's fine.