There isn't any. Or at least, there isn't supposed to be. One of the reason that Subspace Emissary sucks is because they tried to add depth to a game that doesn't need any. Another reason is because they tried to tell a story where the only spoken line of dialog comes from Snake and is "kept you waiting, huh?" when you finally unlock him.an333d said:I think his review was very accurate cause I can't and will never see the "depth" behind Smash Bros.
Unfortunately, the internet is a giant matrix-style breeding vat for idiots. The old ones may get bored, but there will always be new ones to nag.Dyskresiac said:I'm sure this post is going to be lost in the massive shitstorm of Nintendo fanboys (and equally as pathetic, anti-nintendofanboys) but I have to say one thing that I hope eventually gets to Yahtzee.
This is about the third time (or so) that you have reviewed a game that people were constantly nagging you about. Don't you see the cycle you are creating for yourself? You're encourging them to keep doing it! In fact, I'm sure the next fanboy obsessed game to come out you're going to have even MORE spam about it.
Then again, I'm not sure what's worse... the fact that you're encouraging them, or the fact that they haven't caught on that when you NAG Yahtzee to review a game, he's likely going to fucking hate it. I'm sure you know just as well as I do, their intentions when they send in these requests. They want you to praise it like some holy grail of the new era... never does happen.
So I say... do what you want, that is... unless that's throwing some more meat into the lion's pen. Let them starve, and make their own goddamn review videos on YouTube (As long as it doesn't consist of them wanking off to their television screen.)
Eventually they'll leave you alone... and in the end, we can all be happy hearing reviews similar to those in the "early days" (Ugh, I can't believe I'm using that phrase, it's not like it's been more than a few months.)
have u seen his psyconaughts review, also if you have played condemed and thencondemed 2 u can see how much he wanted condemed 2 to be great, and gave it a very positive review (for the first half)Michael_McCloud said:His arguments are backed up, yes, but he doesn't really say anything good about games he reviews nowadays. Anything resembling a redeeming point is just a feint so that he can rape it some more.
Uh, sorry to point this out, but he played the entire Adventure Mode. He references one of the final levels in it in the whole play it twice thing. The Great Maze is really the only part you have to do levels over again.ArchmageDale said:You know, this is almost slightly off topic here, but as someone who almost never actually posts in online forums, as an outsider looking in, I find the monkey see-monkey do reaction to be sociologically interesting. Good example: The Subspace Emissary. Quite fun adventure game, especially when considering the fact that the entire thing can be played co-op with a friend with a fun little story. Until I came here I had heard nothing but positive things about it, but Yahtzee said that he thought it was boring and same-y (as I've stated before, doubtless a judgment he made off of playing the first two levels of a 15-hour game) and suddenly everybody and their brother mysteriously agrees and is an expert on it, including people who by their own admission (like Yahtzee) haven't even played it.
Just an observation I made. That was really what I got on here to talk about in the first place. People who make a judgment of a game based on 5 minutes of play, or better yet, based entirely on gossip they heard without touching the game at all make me shake my head. And I'm talking about all games here, not just Smash Bros.
Well half of the posters here are people saying how much SSBB/Nintendo Sucks.Ultrajoe said:'Gibbering fanboy twats' = those legions of SSBB fans, who, when insulted, will generate almost 800 posts, hundreds more than when Yahtzee offends any other fanbaseArchmageDale said:Oh, and as far as people who "got offended by it being fucking idiots," well that was probably because he pretty much came right out and said "this game is stupid, and if you like it you are stupid." Actually, I think his exact wording was "jibbering fanboy twats," or something close to it. So, yes, I was mildly offended... because he was directly insulting me. That's kind of the textbook definition of being offended. Negative reviews are fine, but when you start directly stating that a person is stupid for their tastes in games (something that members of gaming culture are notoriously bad about) that's when you've crossed the line.
yes, i think gibbering suits nicely, 'twats' perhaps to far
Well duh, don't you listen to the audience cheers? They like Ike.Telekinesis said:Even the new Fire Emblem character, Ike, is fairly popular in the US, having BOTH of his games localized here.
I didn't like it before Yahtzee said he disliked it. In fact, I disagree with alot of the things he said in this review, but still agree with him there. It was just a frustrating experience. I don't think I ever would have finished if it weren't that I could get starwolf, and that's probably why I didn't enjoy it; I only played it to unlock him, jig, and Toon link. So playing through 15 hours of near identicle levels with characters who I had no idea how to play was pretty annoying.ArchmageDale said:You know, this is almost slightly off topic here, but as someone who almost never actually posts in online forums, as an outsider looking in, I find the monkey see-monkey do reaction to be sociologically interesting. Good example: The Subspace Emissary. Quite fun adventure game, especially when considering the fact that the entire thing can be played co-op with a friend with a fun little story. Until I came here I had heard nothing but positive things about it, but Yahtzee said that he thought it was boring and same-y (as I've stated before, doubtless a judgment he made off of playing the first two levels of a 15-hour game) and suddenly everybody and their brother mysteriously agrees and is an expert on it, including people who by their own admission (like Yahtzee) haven't even played it.
MetaKnight- I decided I would play as him a year before Brawl came out because of Kirby Super Star and other stuff. He is not obscure.RPJesus said:Although metaknight and wario might qualify for obscurity. Metaknight's only been in like 3 of kirby's games, and wario's only really well known for warioware. I didn't know who the fuck lucario was, other than "a pokeman" Olimar and Ness are relatively unknown as well. Also, ROB.