theultimateend said:
ZippyDSMlee said:
Ahh old games when devs made games they liked not what tried to keep them in business...
OblivionWolf said:
I would just like to encourage you to try playing through Halo, the original Halo, on PC. You keep lumping it together with it's progeny as if what came after it must be like the original. But even a dwarf glarp from Pluto would have figured out by now, just from watching your reviews, that a game can often be good when first released then be turned into a piece of trash in successive generations.
The story in the game is the most emersive I have encountered. When they brought me down to see the flood for the first time... it was just intense. I love playing the game and still do. I honestly don't know if I would like Halo 2 or 3 because I haven't played them. Halo 2 was released for vista only and I wasn't about to load that pile of cr@p onto my machine to play a game, and the last time i checked halo 3 wasn't out for PC yet. I don't play console games. Even if the graphics are catching up now, the controls still suck.
Halo 1 is a great game, I think its one of the best of the new FPSs ,any FPS made past 03 or so. Halo 2 is rushed and Halo 3 is rushed more.
I have Halo 2 on my PC I bought the vista only BS for 10$ and found a nice "patched" version that can run on XP...they just ported it sadly didn't even try to fix the bugs and issues H2 had.....H3 is a 8 hour game.... blah....
Halo 1 always seemed to be just a graphical enhancement of Perfect Dark (which admittedly was the same of Goldeneye).
I always felt that the N64 RARE FPS's far outshined most new games. Plus the aliens in Perfect Dark were 90k times more interesting than the ones in Halo.
Save for those little dudes...they were really funny

. Flood was stupid to no end though.
PD<DX
PD suffered from crraappppppyyyy controls, it had a good setup but Turok was more playable and frankly I enjoyed them more.
Halo had more older FPS designs to it than most of the games made around the time DOOM 3,ect limited cramped and painfully wrong,Jericho follows in those foot steps with horrid AI(d3 had better AI),no jumping(d3 didn't really need it),on the rails movement(d3 had small level layouts),ect,ect, Halo 1 had large levels, not quite gun and run level design but not mazy either, Halo 2 and beyond has simple gun and run layouts. I did like what they did with the weapons it made you think and made the gameplay a bit more fluid because you could not hide and lay waste to anything near you with 10 weapons.
Halo 1 is good I would say SP wise its equal to Turok 1-3, on the PC Half life and Unreal 1 are better but they are far more adventure based. I could bring up Quake and quake 2 but Halo has story something that most FPSs but Half life lacked.
This is why Halo 1 is one of my last favorite old generation FPS, DOOM 3 and beyond the games lack depth in not only gameplay but level layout and you can see it in all of today's FPSs even Bioshock which is above average by today's standards but not above average by yesterdays standards, and I long for yesterday......thats why I am bitchy

.