@ Jack Spencer Jr.
Alrighty, first and foremost, no one is talking about how often a joke is made. It's the execution. If we're going by "Oh, so and so already did that." Then every comedy act possible has been done, with slight variations popping up in the future that only differ in that they reference things that exist then, but not now. How frequently a joke is made isn't that important compared to how the joke is told/expressed/what have you.
...So, your second paragraph is saying that you need the joke explained? Well, you know, if that's your bag man, whatever. Feel free to enjoy the brand of comedy you prefer, but when complaining about nuance, the subject at hand should have a level of subtlety. Both comics lack this in the extreme. As for the next paragraph, what would those two panels have accomplished? Yes, we all understand that they're going to fight. We don't need someone to explain the concept further with words OR pretty pictures. A warrior has drawn his weapon and recited threatening poetry in the presence of a fierce monster. He's either going to try to kill it or get into its pants. Why would the "rushing panels" add something more?
The gag of the strip is that A) Stabbing. The "punch-line" is so telegraphed it may as well have been a fighter in the "Punch-Out" line of games...And don't bring up "The wife" or "My buddy". That's a fallacious argument, and shall not fly. If we're going that route, I may as well reference "My buddy" that laughs at the name Sean Jones...The name isn't inherently funny, but he finds it so. We all know at least two or three people with similar tastes, but that only proves that we hang out with people we can relate to. Just to clarify, I'm not a fan of ANYONE using arguments like that, period.
To summarize further, CAD could have been "Dur hur hur, stabby" which isn't at all played out. In fact, we can do this with a bunch of comedians. Carlin could be "Dur hur hur, swearing" Robin Williams could be "Dur hur hur MANIC!" and Carlos Mencia could be "Dur hur hur, Dee de dee"...huh. Ignoring that last one, predictability shouldn't play a role in a joke, except to defy said predictability. If you know what's coming, it's not funny. As it's been stated, a punch line should hit you and run away. If you see a punch coming, unless you have terrible reflexes, you're going to get out of the way or at least TRY to move. Same thing with a joke. If you see it coming it really shouldn't hit its mark.
@ Shadow Thief
Read the comics archive and you'll see what I'm referring to in the next couple paragraphs. Regardless of the source of the story (Which...You know, I'm not even going into THAT aspect again.) the comic relied heavily on "Gaming Humor" and only switched to story arcs every once in a while. You could almost feel an audible *clunk* when it shifted back and forth. The miscarriage storyline was also in no way referenced as a way to "make people sad" It was more "You'd have to be a bloody idiot, and a jagoff to boot to even THINK about doing a story like this." To cheapen the whole deal further, I'm going to relate what you've said to something else...Captain Planet.
"Granted, it is a shift from the environmental message, but if you actually watch all of the episodes or at least enough to get the underlying storyline. Then you would understand that it wasn't all episodes about the environment and then out of the clear blue sky a gang violence or aids story is dumped in..."
See what I'm talking about?