Easykill said:
why not keep the pure version for the Escapist?
Well, I can think of two reasons off the top of my head -
1) Maybe there is none. (Maybe Yahtzee made the videos specifically for the event and didn't think to have a 'pure' version to send to The Escapist.) This is what I presume to be the case - and why I was telling people to lay off it already, since I don't see the 'extra work' needed to give us all an (un)clean version justified, or at least not the vehement demanding tone that some people here are wielding about it.
2) Maybe when they said they were going to upload the videos intended for the GDC, they indeed meant the videos intended for the GDC. As in,
that exact version. As in, staying true to their word with pedantry, even if some of you aren't enjoying that.
Either way, I don't see how Yahtzee was contradicted - the Escapist editors didn't censor anything. Whether it was Yahtzee himself that did the censoring as means of social commentary (as was suggested by some) or the GDC people saying, "We dunn want dat kinda language 'ere, mate," it wasn't censored by The Escapist Magazine.
In fact, Yahtzee mentioned that the abstract entity 'Not The Escapist Magazine' - or rather, in his particular highlight, G4, even though I don't know who that is - may, in fact, censor. He simply stressed The Escapist Magazine's editors would never do such a thing. In the case of his blog post, it was someone making censored previews of The Escapist's raw material. In this case, The Escapist is using something for Zero Punctuation that was already censored in its raw form before it was passed by the editors.
Comments for 'the other side': some of you are calling people out for wanting to hear the swearwords by claiming they're immature. Please don't do that - Zero Punctuation indeed thrives of its brutal language, so it's not surprising that people would like to see it left intact. It is part of the artwork. It has nothing to do with immaturity, and everything to do with "the full experience". It's like taking a black crayon and blocking out genitals in a figure drawing. If people complained about that, surely you wouldn't think they're complaining because they are immature and merely look at the images as pornography?
The only reason I don't mind the censorship is because this is very much removed from the norm of Zero Punctuation, and I think we should all be grateful we're getting anything at all (and not 'just' another Travelogue). It's for a different audience with entirely different values. I'd probably be very irked if the ZP weeklies would be censored.
I'm a little surprised there's so much anger on both sides of this equation, to be honest. I don't understand why people are so glaringly upset about the censorship (see above for my reasoning), and I don't really understand why people are aggressive towards those that are. In particular, if both sides are calling each other "idiots", then it's evident that at least one side is wrong about that observation - and chances are both are.
Folks, we're all human, let's treat each other with a sliver of respect, all right?
*expects irony to hit with a the force of a thrown brick right about now, braces* >.>