Right, better to just let the war happen. You got me.Indeed, "those were the conditions", and whether they're utterly unreasonable or coercive doesn't even factor into your equation.
Right, better to just let the war happen. You got me.Indeed, "those were the conditions", and whether they're utterly unreasonable or coercive doesn't even factor into your equation.
Better to not invade.Right, better to just let the war happen. You got me.
I do my best not to engage in discussions on major political events like this, usually on the basis that since I'm not involved I don't have enough of a personal understanding of the guts of the issues to really comment. In this case, I actually do have a personal understanding but I've been avoiding commenting because all I'm doing is stressing myself out and there's really no way I can be kind or even handed in my responses when it comes to this stuff.Anyway, you don't have to like it. Those were the conditions. And it is hardly weird that an alliance and global hegemony that is explicitly hostile to a country is seen as provocative when it seeks to expand near that country.
Look, I think the US needs to be talked about somewhat because their leading NATO against Russia. I also hope we learnt from Iraq/Afghanistan that going in blindly without an actual goal is really badOh my God! Can we please talk about this without it being yet another debate about America?!
NATO isn't going to help Ukraine with a military relief force because Russia just captured Chernobyl, and it's implied they will release radiation from the waste storage into Europe if they help Ukraine because that's the monster Putin is that many of you people defend by distracting us about how the US is bad when the real baddies are trying to annex or oppress whole countries in their regions. (China Taiwan, Russia Ukraine, and Iran a whole bunch of countries in the Middle East including Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen)Look, I think the US needs to be talked about somewhat because their leading NATO against Russia. I also hope we learnt from Iraq/Afghanistan that going in blindly without an actual goal is really bad
And the way that the countries we live in could have accomplished that is to ease tensions by abandoning the pretense that NATO is entitled and aiming to have weapons on the border of Russia.Better to not invade.
Where do you get "deserve" from? That literally doesn't even enter into it. The United States had the choice-- has had the choice for the past few decades-- of easing tensions, instead it encouraged Ukraine to act precisely like the threat Russia believes it to be if it would join NATO; and then they hung it out to dry exactly like Georgia. Obnoxious moral posturing doesn't accomplish anything; negotiating Ukraine's neutrality would have. But the United States didn't do that because it regards the security of Ukraine as expendable and a war between Ukraine and Russia as an opportunity to replace Russia as a source of natural gas for Europe.Where you've crossed the line, in my mind, is to imply that somehow Ukraine deserves what is happening not because they didn't bend the knee - they most certainly folded in an effort to avoid this very situation - but because they didn't bend the knee in the specifically correct way that would also require other groups wholly beyond their control to act a specific way. I cannot possibly imagine a more morally reprehensible justification for invasion and the death of innocent civilians.
Switzerland probably made up their mind around the same time Russia made it very clear that Ukraine is only one of the first nations on their invasion list.How much of an asshole do you have to be for Switzerland to take a side
Ah, better do exactly what the guy with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and that you think is crazy has explicitly told you not to. Again. It'll work out differently the third time. Maybe we'll all die instead of just some of us!Switzerland probably made up their mind around the same time Russia made it very clear that Ukraine is only one of the first nations on their invasion list.
Russia threatens 'serious military repercussions' if Finland joins NATO
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Finland's accession to NATO could 'have detrimental consequences'.news.yahoo.com
You must have missed all the dozens of other justifications Putin has given for military intervention over the last few months (several of them complete fabrications). Remove one of his stated justifications, he still has 12 left over.And the way that the countries we live in could have accomplished that is to ease tensions by abandoning the pretense that NATO is entitled and aiming to have weapons on the border of Russia.
We'll have to wait until they put serious action behind those words cause it could just be face saving.China Foreign Ministry: Ukraine's territory and sovereignty should be respected, urges talks
In a statement on the Russo-Ukraine was released on Friday, China said that Ukraine's territory and sovereignty should be respected and urged talks bewww.fxstreet.com
Well this is huge, their biggest allies turning on them.
At least you've shifted from "Putin innocent" to "Putin too scary, we better give him whatever he wants in the hope he lets us go". It's progress!Ah, better do exactly what the guy with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and that you think is crazy has explicitly told you not to. Again. It'll work out differently the third time. Maybe we'll all die instead of just some of us!
Since even EvilRoy's extremely thoughtful and well-written post didn't get through to you, maybe memes will. Probably not, though; tankie gunna tankie.
You're talking about someone who, with what I assume is a straight face, has suggested that the US military should be used to remove every Jew from Israel, so you tell me.On a not totally unrelated note, hypothetically, if Israel renounced its ties with the US and opposed US imperialism, and the Palestinians got at least nominal US support, I wonder if people's opinions would change.
Yeah, that's why he invaded Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Finland, Belarus. Putin's just going wild, anywhere and everywhere!You must have missed all the dozens of other justifications Putin has given for military intervention over the last few months (several of them complete fabrications). Remove one of his stated justifications, he still has 12 left over.
Cool. That and $5 will buy you a coffee.You know the way in which Russia could have accomplished it, on the other hand? By not invading.
Whereas you're advocating a course of action that will lead either to more invasions of places on Russia's border or, better, the extinction of all human life. Very moral of you.At least you've shifted from "Putin innocent" to "Putin too scary, we better give him whatever he wants in the hope he lets us go". It's progress!
Is Chernobyl a bigger threat than a nuke? Seems like a really great way to give yourself radiation poisoning. Also, Russia isn't going to use nukes IN Ukraine... because they WANT Ukraine. Damaging any part of it makes this whole invasion uselessNATO isn't going to help Ukraine with a military relief force because Russia just captured Chernobyl, and it's implied they will release radiation from the waste storage into Europe if they help Ukraine because that's the monster Putin is that many of you people defend by distracting us about how the US is bad when the real baddies are trying to annex or oppress whole countries in their regions. (China Taiwan, Russia Ukraine, and Iran a whole bunch of countries in the Middle East including Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen)
Ukraine reports higher Chernobyl radiation after Russians capture plant
Ukraine said on Friday it had recorded increased radiation levels from the defunct Chernobyl nuclear power plant, a day after the site was captured by Russian forces, due to military activity causing radioactive dust to rise into the air.www.reuters.com
Most Americans didn't even vote for Bush Jr, he won because the cunts in SCOTUS at the time made him win, and the Dems did win Florida.
And yes to the other post saying I got Putin wrong, I assumed Putin would back off if Ukraine didn't join NATO which France did signal, and Ukraine was headed there by calling it a dream.
Why does it sound so similar to people defending abusive parents? "If the kids had just do what they are told, the father wouldn't have beat them up"At least you've shifted from "Putin innocent" to "Putin too scary, we better give him whatever he wants in the hope he lets us go". It's progress!
Yes, the foremost military power in history is a kid with an abusive parent. Fascinating.Why does it sound so similar to people defending abusive parents? "If the kids had just do what they are told, the father wouldn't have beat them up"