This was my question as well. I haven't played either game, but from what I've seen, Part 1 doesn't seem to quite exactly have the gameplay of Part 2. The animations are stellar, but don't seem to be as smooth as Part 2. The gore as well doesn't seem on par.
Sure, but you're equally paying 70 bucks for a game from 2007. One that is not so much a remake as a re-texture with improved animations. Shadow of the Colossus has also been released three times.
Well, Joel and Ellie move very differently, so there's that. Ellie is a lot more fast and agile and the level design accomodated for that. I also don't know how far you can veer away from the original animations without needing to recalibrate the input and the timing on everything. The faces definitely lack the finer animations of the sequel, since all of it needs to be key-framed without any facial capture to back it up.
Yeah, they can't seem to not to. I mean, the disability options are great (as they were in the sequel), and the fact that there'll be fully voiced narration is pretty amazing, but referring to it as 'award winning' comes off very smug.
I had to look it up but yeah, TLoU2’s accessibility options pretty much fueled this -
amp.cnn.com
Surely they could have replace "seeing" with something else in that headline, maybe "witness" or "realize"...I had to look it up but yeah, TLoU2’s accessibility options pretty much fueled this -
Regardless I guess they have a right to be proud, as it’s a pretty stellar effort that has also led to things like this -
A blind video gamer got emotional after seeing The Last of Us Part II's extensive accessibility options for players with disabilities
When blind gamer Steve Saylor received an early review copy of The Last of Us Part II, one of the most anticipated video games of the year, he wasn't entirely sure what to expect.
www.videogameschronicle.com
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/FNGTKXPFVJLP7FVGB6CVJX7SLA.jpg)
www.reuters.com
www.gamespot.com
Utter bullshit. I hadn't even thought about a VR Splinter Cell, but that would have sold me on a VR setup. I swear Ubisoft and their whore mothers can all die in two fires.Hey @Samtemdo8, and @Xprimentyl...not good news? I guess depending how you look at it.
Ubisoft Cancels Four Games, Including Splinter Cell VR And Ghost Recon Frontline
As it delays two games, Ubisoft has canceled four others.
www.escapistmagazine.com
I wonder what happened at Ubisoft to cause all these titles to collapse all at once.Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora Delay Strikes, Game Coming in 2023 - 2024
The upcoming Ubisoft game, Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora, has been hit with a delay and will now launch in 2023-2024, per a sales report.
www.playstationlifestyle.net
I know what you're trying to say here but considering No Man's Sky apparently has gotten a lot better since it's awful mess of a launch, apparently giving a lot of the fans what they wanted out of it to start with, that may not be the best example to use. They deserve plenty of blame for how it came out but there is something to be said for all the work they've been putting into it. I haven't even played it and I can't personally judge but it's clear Hello Games really does care about it.Report: Some of Skull and Bones' Own Devs Aren't Confident About the Game
Skull and Bones gameplay apparently doesn't have much to offer besides what players have already seen, according to some developers.
Speaking of which....This is going to be No Man's Pirate.
My only issue with that is assumes any management was going on to begin with, which I'm finding increasingly hard to believe. I'd make a joke about monkeys banging away at typewriters but that's an insult to monkeys.
Gotta wonder what they had envisioned for it. IIRC the idea was to expand upon the framework already set with Black Flag, so the fact the project has been in limbo for this long is more than a bit baffling even by Ubi standards.
I've read numerous times they really didn't seem to know what they wanted to do with it. Apparently they kept going back and forth between having on-foot and just ship stuff and scrapped development stuff along the way. Also the allegations that French Executives used the Singapore studio as a Vacation and none of the local Singaporeans were allowed to be promoted to Management positions in the studio isn't helping this either. While I'm not entirely sure if that's true, the allegations about harassment in the other studios and a lot of the questionable design decisions they've made over the past few years really doesn't give me a lot of reason to give them the benefit of the doubt here.
kotaku.com
More or less matches up to what Pat and Woolie discussed. I dislike Kotaku, but they have people that at least try and care about important issues within the gaming industry.I've read numerous times they really didn't seem to know what they wanted to do with it. Apparently they kept going back and forth between having on-foot and just ship stuff and scrapped development stuff along the way. Also the allegations that French Executives used the Singapore studio as a Vacation and none of the local Singaporeans were allowed to be promoted to Management positions in the studio isn't helping this either. While I'm not entirely sure if that's true, the allegations about harassment in the other studios and a lot of the questionable design decisions they've made over the past few years really doesn't give me a lot of reason to give them the benefit of the doubt here.
The Messy, Stalled Reckoning At An Assassin's Creed Co-Developer
Ubisoft Singapore devs report sexual harassment, toxic managers, and bad pay
Yeah, it's Kotaku, so take that it as you will, but it still sounds pretty damning
www.nme.com
latestgamestories.com
www.videogameschronicle.com
www.videogameschronicle.com
www.abc.net.au
