A lot of things that would take forever to type out, but relevantly your post seems to imply that their ideology would say women are all weak and incompetent, or that seeing a man in woman's clothing should offend their sensibilities independent of context. None of that is accurate.
Well, their own audience seems to think women are supposed to be weak and incompetent. It's why they hated Terror On The Prairie. Never mind the 20-years-out-of-date jokes about women's sports being less valid than men's in Lady Ballers or the speech about how women's roles are to "civilize" men because they can't be as strong or athletically capable as them.
hey I never said I was in favour. I said weird how it takes Trump saying it to highlight how fucked up it is and call it out but most of those calling Trump out won't call Trudeau out because tribalism.
Nope, just seen and heard enough from Canadians.
You know what I was going to leave this one quietly not point out the flawed logic in your earlier comment but screw it.
That's not remotely what those reviews said. They all said it wasn't a good movie, and that's really what these people want. They want good movies, and they want to be allowed to criticize bad movies without being called bigots.
No, not at all. If anything, the complaint is not feminine enough.
Don't believe your lying eyes and ears folks. Tstorm is finally here to explain the alternative truth of what these people really meant with their actions and words.
Right-wing nutjobs: "We're going to gun every last one of you down in the streets. We'll kill you all."
I went through the negative reviews in that article and checked the profiles.
Then they shouldn't act like bigots.
It's because his strongman mindset thinks that anything other than macho posturing and attacking those who can't fight back is "weakness".
Because being gay and sissy is abhorrent, and destroying your enemy is honourable.
So does Geert Wilders; the most popular politician in the Netherlands who totally didn't mean all those racist things he's said in his political career. And who also totally wasn't buddying up with Poetin and trying to downplay his actions, untill Russia shot down a plane full of dutch citizens, and he reluctantly stopped slurping his ass.
I know you're doing a hot take but we had a thread devoted to this and most people here were not impressed with Trudeau's policy. I seem to remember it being controversial in Canada but that's through the lens of Australian media which is purely right-wing. So I would defer to Canadians here
Oh nonono. Even after MH17 he went on a pilgrimage to the Kremlin to get a special friendship pin from the Duma.
You are correct - in my attempt to discredit him I was still giving him too much credit.
Hollywood has had decreasing success trying to make movies with hard-edged Clint Eastwood style protagonists, and their solution is to take the same tired tropes they fail with and just swap the genders. But the writing is otherwise the same, so the change in gender is useless, and any criticism gets labelled sexism. If the made the now female leads somewhat feminine, it might justify the decisions at least a little, rather than there being no justification at all for why we should care any more than we do about a crappy Steven Seagal film.
Many Clinton Eastwood movies aren't that great. It was a bad style of protagonist to copy so it's no wonder they failed
Well no, its that a lot of the backlash tends to focus solely on the fact it's a woman, rather than the writing.
? This is at odds with your earlier statements about how all traditionally-masculine or traditionally-feminine roles & behaviours are just as appropriate for men as for women, and that's why gender doesn't exist.
I think adding "crappy" is unnecessary, as it's already implicit in the term "Steven Seagal film".
