I don't think anyone said it negates the actions of the protests, we just already had multiple massive threads discussing those actions already. This was about the new revelations in the investigations. The fact that protesters did damage was already known. This was new information we were not aware of at the time. I was not aware that ANYONE here remotely thought protesters didn't do damage as well. It is just the shooting at police officers while they were in the building that these guys did + the fire that Trump said was why he needed to deploy the military and "dominate the streets". Trump blamed this on Antifa with no mention of the Boogs.Wow, not one person addressed the substance of my post, ie the previous 4 indictments for arson. I also never defended the boogaloo boys. All in all, the responses here are pretty shocking. I find it odd that leftists are creaming themselves over a revelation that a boogaloo boy showed up to an arson as if that somehow negates the actions of hundreds of people.
"It’s not our fault we chanted 'burn it down' and then joined in burning down the precinct! The boogaloo boys made us do it when they showed up!"
The op is also incorrect that the boogaloo boy in question "opened fire on police." He opened fire on the precinct when it was already abandoned and being looted." That was a strange and incorrect way to phrase what the article actually said.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...ilitary-forces-to-deal-with-growing-protests/

How the president could invoke martial law
As we approach the 2020 election, some are concerned about martial law.


Trump tweet intimating military will fire on ‘looters’ in Minnesota sparks another warning from Twitter
Trump tweet over military involvement in Minnesota protests draws Twitter warning


Trump, Barr tell governors to ‘dominate’ streets in response to unrest
President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr told governors in a conference call Monday that they should respond to unrest by 'dominating' the streets.
Last edited: