Don't play coy. We see you for what you are.Who said I ever supported it?
Don't play coy. We see you for what you are.Who said I ever supported it?
Can’t read the article, but do they have any pictures of the bomb itself or video of it going off? Media can be over dramatic about pipe shaped objects or fireworks.A bomb found at Capitol. It's officially terrorism: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/0...-is-found-at-the-rnc-and-the-dnc-is-evacuated
So, what now @Houseman ? You still support this? Because it's LITERALLY terrorism now.
So you can't quote me approving of this?Don't play coy. We see you for what you are.
Here's the relevant portion: "The device that was found at the R.N.C. was a pipe bomb that was successfully destroyed by a bomb squad, according to an official for the R.N.C."Can’t read the article, but do they have any pictures of the bomb itself or video of it going off? Media can be over dramatic about pipe shaped objects or fireworks.
Thank you local fascistSo you can't quote me approving of this?
Here's the relevant portion: "The device that was found at the R.N.C. was a pipe bomb that was successfully destroyed by a bomb squad, according to an official for the R.N.C."
Yeah, i saw that.Trump tells everyone to go home
I don't have to. I'm not a moron. Your approval of these events is implied in pretty much every post since the results of the election. You're not fooling anybody. We know that you're a Trump loyalist, we know that you can't deal with the fact that he lost and we know that you're a liar who's desperately trying to hide the level of support that you have for Trump. But you're just not very good at that.So you can't quote me approving of this?
Ah okay, we're going with "hidden implications" and "reading between the lines" now.Your approval of these events is implied in pretty much every post since the results of the election.
We can't quote you condemning it either, and your pasts post supporting the conspiracy theories that motivated this put you in a negative light. The time for the schrodinger act is over. If you don't state your position clearly now, you forfeit your right to refute the accusations.So you can't quote me approving of this?
Maybe.But at heart he's also a coward so its equally possible he's spooked about just how much trouble this is going to bring him. One could very well argue that inciting a mob to storm the capitol is a criminal offense.
They're not hidden. We are not fuckin' morons. You are not fooling any of us. You are done on this website. Get that through your head already. A new username is your only chance.Ah okay, we're going with "hidden implications" and "reading between the lines" now.
If this is your standard for proof, one wonders why you aren't immediately believing all the election fraud claims.
I do not support this. Storming the capitol, acts of violence, bombs, any of it.We can't quote you condemning it either, and your pasts post supporting the conspiracy theories that motivated this put you in a negative light. The time for the schrodinger act is over. If you don't state your position clearly now, you forfeit your right to refute the accusations.
They haven't, though. I mean, sure some of them literally sat in seats reserved for members of government for photo ops, but it's not like they control the city.So, since armed and seditious revolutionaries have occupied the seat of government in Washington DC, can we expect the deployment of Delta Force or similar branches for a swift resolution?
That's enough for me. Thank you.I do not support this. Storming the capitol, acts of violence, bombs, any of it.
I think it would have been better if they would have protested peacefully outside the capitol, and let the debates go on.
Of course, this won't convince certain people who have already made up their minds.
You have said that you do things to get reactions out of peopleI do not support this. Storming the capitol, acts of violence, bombs, any of it.
I think it would have been better if they would have protested peacefully outside the capitol, and let the debates go on.
Of course, this won't convince certain people who have already made up their minds.
What? No I don't, why would you think that?You have said that you do things to get reactions out of people
To be fair, he's not necessarily. He might just hate us all so much he wants to annoy us irrespective of what he's actually arguing. Of course, what tends to happen is that doing so genuinely radicalises. People start trying to merely aggravate other users or playing devil's advocate with no investment, but they end up increasingly believing in their argument.I don't have to. I'm not a moron. Your approval of these events is implied in pretty much every post since the results of the election. You're not fooling anybody. We know that you're a Trump loyalist, we know that you can't deal with the fact that he lost and we know that you're a liar who's desperately trying to hide the level of support that you have for Trump. But you're just not very good at that.