Whatever happened to actually making an invention or product before patenting it? Rather then just a concept that you can sue people over for making because you don't actually know how?
Oh you sneaky bastard... What if I have a dream about "1"?Vothriller said:I patent the numbers 1 and 0. See you in the court, world.
Since you are not "using" it in any logical sense or in the real world, I'll allow it. Hey, I can also sue top tens now!Celtic_Kerr said:Oh you sneaky bastard... What if I have a dream about "1"?Vothriller said:I patent the numbers 1 and 0. See you in the court, world.
And welcome to the escapist!
All they really have do to is say "GTFO my business or my corporate assassins will destroy you."TheTygerfire said:All Activision has to say is that their games don't support in-game online tournaments on their own and, boom, lawsuit invalidated.
Edit: At least tournament in the general, commonly used sense.
Actually the human genome patent I was talking about was a company that patented a gene that was used to detect breast cancer, not the process used, but the gene itself, and were attempting to change anyone using that gene (in any medical test) licensing fees; yes the patent was invalidated, but only after several years and a court case, it should never have been granted in the first damn place.Erynn said:tkioz said:Patent Trolls, Companies patenting the human-fucking-genome, the excessive length of IP and Copyright, and vague nonsense common sense patents are the reason the entire Intellectual Property system needs a massive overall.
You realise the Genome thing was done by a guy trying to ensure that no corporation could do it by proving it could NOT be patented? Turns out, it can't be.
I think this is a similar thing, at least, in that it won't fly because it's too damn obvious and fundamental. Patents have to be very specific. General ideas tend to get thrown out if someone comes along later sand screams "My idea! PATENT!". Unless a design schematic was present they're unlikely to get anywhere.