I think this tops "Activision suing Brutal Legend for it being 'competition' to Guitar Hero" for stupid reasons to sue...
Yeah, it's called "prior art", and it will undermine any patent claim. Off hand my first suggestion would be something like Ultima Online or maybe Unreal.Bobic said:Weren't online tournaments around long before 2002 anyway?
Activision's lawyers know this, and in fact for this reason they will likely not settle, not if they can spend much less just getting it thrown out.Starke said:Yeah, it's called "prior art", and it will undermine any patent claim. Off hand my first suggestion would be something like Ultima Online or maybe Unreal.Bobic said:Weren't online tournaments around long before 2002 anyway?
They do, They filed in 2002, Doom was 1993. I'm not completely certain about the architecture involved but they should satisfy "prior art".zBeeble said:At least they went after someone with money first.
I don't know if Doom/Quake predates their "discovery" ... but I'm pretty sure something like xpilot would.
They are. The sad fact is that most people who work in the field are lawyers, not programmers, so when a company comes along and claims to have patented... let's say "a dynamic asynchronous data upload/download data transfer system", or in this case their tournament system, none of the attorneys involved know enough on the subject to realize that the patent is far too vague, what's worse is that it will take a lawsuit to reveal this, as most lawyers looking at that wouldn't realize just how vague the patent really is.Mordwyl said:I thought patents were supposed to be specific, not so vague you can sue people over anything.
Like, ah, Unreal Tournament? (1999) I'm pretty sure that Jedi Knight: Dark Forces 2 (1997) and Halo (2001) also fall into that category. The issue is that I doubt there're any scholarly papers specifically dealing with the subject (as there would be for most inventions), so the issue of prior art could get weird.Bobic said:Weren't online tournaments around long before 2002 anyway?
Rorschach read that last sentance out for me and I'm afraid of what you might do to the patent trolls now.theriddlen said:Zynga can fall, fate of casuals is not relevant to me.
somebody did that already:treeboy027 said:Well, I patent the sun!
It's already an element of patent law, called "prior art". If someone did it before you filed you're shit out of luck.WabbitTwacks said:somebody did that already:treeboy027 said:Well, I patent the sun!
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpps/news/offbeat/spanish-woman-claims-she-now-owns-sun-dpgonc-20101126-gc_10808147
and there should be a law against patenting things that are already in use. that is just ridiculous. i should patent gardening or figure skating.
Wouldn't the first Battle.net [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle.net] satisfy that too? the one created in 1997 by blizzard for diablo, Starcraft may have gotten in on it too, was never a big player of Blizzard games.Starke said:They do, They filed in 2002, Doom was 1993. I'm not completely certain about the architecture involved but they should satisfy "prior art".zBeeble said:At least they went after someone with money first.
I don't know if Doom/Quake predates their "discovery" ... but I'm pretty sure something like xpilot would.
EDIT: I take that back, none of the FPSs would satisfy it because they didn't actually use centralized architecture for their multi-player until relatively recently. Any MMO before 2002 that had PVP and kept track of character's on any kind of leader board (visible or otherwise) would however.
EDIT 2: A quick search suggests that Dark Age of Camelot would satisfy the definition provided in the patent, and was released in 2001.
I lay claim to the visible light spectrum.Celtic_Kerr said:I call water! Since there's more of it than there is ground. No ships in mah domain! Mwahaha!NeedAUserName said:I call dibs on the ground. So, maybe you and I don't pay each other?Super Toast said:If that's possible, I'm gonna go patent the air.
I could get in on that bargain
I hadn't thought about that, but indeed it might.Dom Kebbell said:Wouldn't the first Battle.net [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle.net] satisfy that too? the one created in 1997 by blizzard for diablo, Starcraft may have gotten in on it too, was never a big player of Blizzard games.Starke said:They do, They filed in 2002, Doom was 1993. I'm not completely certain about the architecture involved but they should satisfy "prior art".zBeeble said:At least they went after someone with money first.
I don't know if Doom/Quake predates their "discovery" ... but I'm pretty sure something like xpilot would.
EDIT: I take that back, none of the FPSs would satisfy it because they didn't actually use centralized architecture for their multi-player until relatively recently. Any MMO before 2002 that had PVP and kept track of character's on any kind of leader board (visible or otherwise) would however.
EDIT 2: A quick search suggests that Dark Age of Camelot would satisfy the definition provided in the patent, and was released in 2001.
well damn. hmm other ridiculous patents.... I patent stomachs!WabbitTwacks said:somebody did that already:treeboy027 said:Well, I patent the sun!
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpps/news/offbeat/spanish-woman-claims-she-now-owns-sun-dpgonc-20101126-gc_10808147
and there should be a law against patenting things that are already in use. that is just ridiculous. i should patent gardening or figure skating.