Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
thaluikhain said:
Alright, I can sort of see what you're getting at, but clarification would be good.
What exactly constitutes "bad" discussion of self defense and how does that discussion apply any differently to a mugging versus a rape?
Well, the victim of a rape is almost certainly blamed, to some extent for it. This isn't the case for most crimes. For example, locally, on NYE, a man was king hit. It made national news (repeatedly), there were calls for "king hit" to be renamed "coward hit", the attack condemned as nothing more than thuggery, and so on. Which is fair enough.
However, also on NYE, a woman was raped, made news sparingly, and that was slanted to be about it being a reminder that women should be more careful.
Now, in regards to self-defence, there's not much difference between saying self-defence is useful, and people ought to learn self defence, and there's not much different between that and saying they are wrong if they don't. If the victim wasn't blamed so much, this probably wouldn't be an issue, though.
As well as that, it promotes a widespread and dangerous view about rape, that it's of the "jumped by stranger in back alley" type, which is a real problem. It's also rather over-simplified...women have been raped en route to self defence classes, and by self defence instructors.