Susan Arendt said:
My question is, did the kid understand he was cheating? I'm not convinced he understood the nuance of the situation. Which doesn't mean he shouldn't be punished for it, just the same, I'm just wondering.
Pretty much depends on the type and degree of autism. It's unfortunate, but a lot of us tend to immediately think "Rain Man" when we hear the term--either complete genius, total 'retard,' or a combination of the two. Most of the time, you'd notice some awkwardness, but not much else.
It is possible, though, that any child of this age would know they were "cheating," but wouldn't understand the gravity of the offense--especially a child with a diagnosed problem in identifying social norms. The punishment is probably a little immature itself. Not wrong, per se, but childish in its implementation. (And frankly, I go back and forth on game content that is gated behind online-only achievements... but that's a whoooole 'nuther discussion.)
At the end of it all, though, everyone's coming down heavier on the
mother for this one, and rightfully so. We can't really weigh in on the kid without further details of his condition, and I don't see any reason to think we'll be getting those anytime soon.