SO FUCKING ADORABLE! But yes, sinister cat, we are all 'not amused'.Necromancer1991 said:
Summer is not known for being a time when the daring and original are on display. It's the time for dumb (really really dumb) fun. Sometimes without the fun. Inception looks awesome, though.axnxgxixe said:ARE THERE NO MORE ORIGINAL MOVIE IDEAS???????
Seriously. Just about everything that has come out or is coming out is a remake, sequel, or making a movie out of something that already existed in a different form.
Plus, let's be serious. No one asked for another TMNT movie. And another one is definitely not needed.
Ok are you one of those that grew up with G1? Because like it sounds like you want a direct version of that on screen. My god what worked in 1985 doesnt hold up in 2010. Could it have been more in tune with the original yes. Should have been Spike not Sam, and his dad, actually a very good actor in his role, could have been a mechanic and all that.The_root_of_all_evil said:Correlation not causation. A lot of people watched them, but if you replace the Transformers in the film with the Gundam, Gobots or any other robots, the same people would enjoy those films.Primus1985 said:Both Transformers movies made hundreds of millions of dollars, obviously somebody must enjoy them.
That makes it not a Transformer film, just a big robot film.
And I don't diss you for that.(I do)
Therein lies the rub. Lots of non-Transformer fans see it because of the sex+explosions. Lots of Transformer fans see it because of the name.If people hate him so much, dont see his movies!
What the franchise fans are still missing (and now can't get to see because of the licence) is a film about the Transformers, which is why the fans rant.
Not that simple. People want to see a summer blockbuster, and will see it regardless of its merit. Some of those fans will be happy with booty shots and explosions, regardless of the context. But it's the use of context/franchise with no reference to it that infuriates.Just that simple, and if enough people dont see said movie guess what? He wont remake another franchise.
It won't be, and the main reason is that Bay will keep taking ready made franchises and throwing in his own blend of microwave-meals movies on top of them. No effort, no re-writes, loads of money, and a new horde of slavering fans that think their version is the real one.Heed my advise Escapist, im tired of all the Bay-hate and maybe this will be a way to settle the debate(and get Moviebob to stop mentioning it every three seconds in his reviews)
If you want to get n million people to have a good time, get the lot of them drunk on hype, stick some sexiness in and end in a big explosion. That doesn't make it a good film, and it certainly doesn't make it a Transformers film. It just makes it a summer blockbuster.
And what chance do the original franchise fans have? See the film they've been dreaming of (even though they know it's crap) or get crucified by the leagues of people who enjoyed a film designed to play on their base emotions?
Bay cannot make a good film. He can take a great story and use it as a background to retell the same story that always makes money. What he also does in the same hand-wave is add in his own personal prejudices and biases.
Want proof? Watch what happens with SATC2. Hideously overblown budget, stupid script, repulsive message, critics pan it - and I bet it still makes a profit. Exactly the same with Twilight and for the same reasons. It takes a great premise and then feeds the audience with their own preconceptions/aspirations.
Result: Huge box office, lots of new fans. No relation to the power of the original.
Don't like quoteing but I'm going to this time...Fightgarr said:I'm a HUGE TMNT fan and, to be honest?
I don't mind. The Turtles have never been about developed stories, deep characters or any real quality that makes a "good movie". The Turtles have always been, to me, about bad jokes, bad jokes about ninjas, bad jokes about turtles, and some okay action. Michael Bay makes entertaining films. I LOVED Bad Boys I&II, because they were entertaining. They were stupid, they weren't all that funny, but man were they entertaining as hell to watch. That's what I want out of a Turtles movie, that's what I can expect with Bay. Hell, I don't even not mind:
I'm excited.
1 *takes a very deep breath* FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU...Sir Kemper said:Sound of every TMNT fan rageing in 3...2...
Hrmm... Well it may work... with tons of green screen and editing...Tom Goldman said:In opposition to 2007's TMNT, which used computer-generated turtles, Bay's film is presumed to be based on the 1990s live-action Turtles films.
I was one of those people who grew up with G1, and I happen to think it'd work fine today. The original Transformers the movie had a ton of action, even some very disturbing material for a supposedly "kiddy cartoon movie" as a lot of people seem to think cartoon movies are. Yes it had some humour, but at the end it had a lot of gritty moments. Basically almost anything with Unicron in it in the movie tended to involve death and/or dramatic moments.Primus1985 said:Ok are you one of those that grew up with G1? Because like it sounds like you want a direct version of that on screen. My god what worked in 1985 doesnt hold up in 2010. Could it have been more in tune with the original yes. Should have been Spike not Sam, and his dad, actually a very good actor in his role, could have been a mechanic and all that.
Nope, this will do.Primus1985 said:Ok are you one of those that grew up with G1? Because like it sounds like you want a direct version of that on screen.
Son, we don't flame here.What i think I mean is, lighten up and grow up.
But he isn't. There's many directors that are superior to Bay's ADHD camera work. People with style, grace and who can make combat work on differing levels. Not just thrust titties and glare at you.And besides would you rather have someone like Bay who is great at action and have them actually fighting, or would you rather the robots stand around and talk for 2 hours?
The sad thing is... that game trailer looked better than either Bay film. I always felt like there was some kind of paranoia about doing a completely animated modern film based on the fact that the 1986 Transformers movie didn't perform so well at the box office. But that was traditional animation and I like that movie better to this day. Now, if they had done a full CG-animated, gritty and dark looking film like this game trailer looks, it just may have been an improvement.The_root_of_all_evil said:Nope, this will do.Primus1985 said:Ok are you one of those that grew up with G1? Because like it sounds like you want a direct version of that on screen.
This is what the Transformers is, was and always has been.
Son, we don't flame here.What i think I mean is, lighten up and grow up.
But he isn't. There's many directors that are superior to Bay's ADHD camera work. People with style, grace and who can make combat work on differing levels. Not just thrust titties and glare at you.And besides would you rather have someone like Bay who is great at action and have them actually fighting, or would you rather the robots stand around and talk for 2 hours?
Something that acknowledged that the Transformers are actual characters would have been nice. As it was, with little to no focus on them they didn't have time to develop any actual character, whereas there was a veritable legion of squishies, mostly annoying, who got lots of completely irrelevant character exposition.Primus1985 said:Ok are you one of those that grew up with G1? Because like it sounds like you want a direct version of that on screen.
Ironically, there are few actual action scenes in the Transformers movies, instead we get scenes with annoying fat hackers and annoying roommates and Sam's stoned mom. Giant Robots waxing lyrical for two hours probably would have been preferable.And besides would you rather have someone like Bay who is great at action and have them actually fighting, or would you rather the robots stand around and talk for 2 hours?