Not true. They have control over IW.Net and can charge to use it and they can probably patch the older games to charge for access to the master-server. Either way is a HUGE dickmove though.Emphraim said:No, COD5 is the game before MW2. MW2 is COD6. Since COD5 is server based(as in you can actually set up your own server) they have no control over it. I and most people I know will stick with COD5 or COD4 until they bring back dedicated server support. If they don't then we still have ARMA 2 and TF2.
Depends on what you think I think I was thinking I thought...Slycne said:Or even better if millions of dollars were spent on competitors games. Piracy just tells them it's still popular and they just need to figure out how to further discourage it usually at the expense of legal consumers. You're not sending the message you think you are.fix-the-spade said:As much as I dislike piracy it would be incredibly awesome for Activision's sales to flatline under the poison of a million torrents...
Well to be fair WOW is not that unique. There have been many games like it before. Though never as simple. There are also later competitors around. But your point remains valid.Striker Vulsine said:Lets look at this from a sane standpoint. The ONLY reason Blizzard made/is making tons of money from WOW is because you can sink hundreds of hours into the game easily, AND it is unique. Players create characters, they level up, they play with their friends a LOT, players are not going to pay a monthly subscription fee ontop of Xbox live, or even on PC or PS3, to play a game that, in all honesty, is alot like any other FPS out there.
I hope they do do this, get the response they are going to get (almost noone buys the online subscription) and see that subscription fees only work for unique and massive services like Xbox live or WOW.
Glad to have you on boardMysticnFm said:This is bullshit.
Activision boycott, here we come.
Actually, that's 150 million, only if you are talking about 10 million active accounts at $15USD a month. now there are 12 million, so add another 30 million dollars a month to that. almost 200 million a month. all I can say is... WoW.Turtleboy1017 said:And so it has finally happened...
Another money making scheme from them. As if the 50 million they pull in monthly from WoW isn't enough already.
To me this is nothing but the beginning of the end. It was bound to happen eventually. (End of me buying anything other than D3 from Activision/Blizzard.)
Well they actually seem to have lost a lot of PC gamers as of now. Think they hang around 32000 or something online players (it was the last thing I heard at least). But still that means plenty of idiots bought that game. Look were that got us...HUBILUB said:Are you sure? Everyone said that they would lose customers because they fucked PC over, yet they broke records.GamesB2 said:This is a very bad idea, if call of duty gets wow-like subscription then they will lose many many customers.
I think people will still couch up money for them and it will become so popular that more games does it.
Don't stoop to their level brother. This is the chance we have to open their little gaming-puppy eyes!Fearzone said:I guess pissing of PC gamers isn't good enough.
For all the times I heard: "get over it" around the dedicated server issue I have one response to this:
Get over it.
It sold so much because it was released on ps3 xbox and pc, the pc was fucked over and they lost alot of pc customers, xbox and ps3 were getting what they would have got anyway. this will lose even more people as this will presumably affect all three platforms. and i know im not paying any subscription fees and most of my friends wont. people will still pay, just alot less peopleHUBILUB said:Are you sure? Everyone said that they would lose customers because they fucked PC over, yet they broke records.GamesB2 said:This is a very bad idea, if call of duty gets wow-like subscription then they will lose many many customers.
I think people will still couch up money for them and it will become so popular that more games does it.