Well, my experience suggests that successful polyamorous relationships (which not all polyamorous relatonships are, of course) cheating ultimately becomes very difficult, because deception just becomes pointless. If my partner was sneaking off to bang someone to the point it impacted on my life, I wouldn't feel it was malicious.. I'd feel it was stupid. Honestly, I think I'd be more disgusted that I was sleeping with someone who was ashamed of their own sex life than any conception of betrayal because why do I care? Why would my sense of self worth be impacted?BinDipper said:Doesn't really matter though. Cheating can still happen in polyamorous relationships, it's the deception and betrayal that's key to cheating, not an arbitrary measure of who put what body part where.
I mean, the only other thing is the STI risk but as I see it I committed to dealing with that risk when I got into this lifestyle. If you don't expect your partner to be monogamous, then it's pretty stupid not to take some responsibility. Why would I rely completely on anyone else for something that important? In fact, I don't really see why monogamy makes a difference there. After all you have no way of guaranteeing your partner is monogamous or being honest about their sexual history just because they say they are anyway. Stastically, every fourth person posting here will cheat at some point in their lives.[footnote]Although you shouldn't trust stats about this completely, as they're pretty hard to obtain within the boundaries of good research and vary widely - still, 25% is a pretty low estimate for lifetime prevalence. Kinsey was reporting 50% in the 1950s.[/footnote]
This is obviously just my feeling, but I think it's quite indicative of the attitudes of people I know who have stuck with poly long term.
I also want to talk about this because both these arguments are things I've encountered and I think they aren't good responses to each other. The historical argument that monogamy is archaic is based on the idea that monogamy doesn't work and that things like cheating evidence this. The argument that poly is evidence of personal weakness, however, is not based on whether it actually works, but simply on the idea that sex is wrong and that engaging in it represents some kind of personal degradation, which is something anyone is entitled to believe but isn't really a response. In fact, this argument is particularly inappropriate in the case of polyamory as a subculture because it is a group which is so insistent that what they do is not about sex at all. I mean, polyamory, from the latin amor meaning affection or love.[footnote]I don't buy that, I don't think that separation is particularly real, but it's certainly an argument people will fall back on..[/footnote]BinDipper said:It's just one way to look at it, another way to look at is is that polyamorous folks are weak and hedonistic and care only about satisfying their base urges above all else.
I mean, you could make the argument that poly doesn't work in the sense that most polyamorous relationships tend to be very short-lived and a lot of people do end up going back to monogamous relationships long term. That's certainly my memory of what the research says anyway. I mean, I'd respond by saying that no relationship pattern really seems to be working right now so who cares, but I still think it's a more genuine counter to Mikeyfell's argument than just "sex is bad, you're weak if you do it for no reason". That's pretty easy to dismiss.