BinDipper said:
No that is wrong. To put it how wikipedia puts it, "Betrayal is the breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations."
Okay.. I think I see the problem here.
I kind of fundamentally reject the notion that relationships are contractual. I'm kind of aware in saying that that it puts me at odds with most of the poly community so don't take me as a spokesperson in this regard, but to me, this is what I am non-monogamous to escape, because the notion of preconditioned contractual obligations doesn't fit in with my conception of trust at all. I don't get the concept of marriage, for example, because I don't understand why you would ever tell someone you always wanted to be with them. That's not something you can ever really know the answer to, so why would you say it?
I take your point in a broader sense, though. I'm sure many people do see betrayal in those terms.
to put to it simply, when one says "betrayal" there is an implicit "of trust/commitment/contract" on the end.
BinDipper said:
For example, if a friend trusts me to look after their cat and I feed it paracetamol and kill it, they might not give a shit. They might be a callous bastard who says "fuck that cat, it was just a cat." But that doesn't mean I didn't betray their trust, it doesn't mean I didn't fail in the commitment I made to them.
I don't think you can generalize, even about a situation so extreme. For example, if you have severe mental health problems that's going to fundamentally change how I percieve your actions. It doesn't change the fact that you've killed my cat, but it does change whether or not I can contextualize it as betrayal in ways which can't be reduced to the killing of the cat as a breach of contract.
But this is getting very semantic.
BinDipper said:
Polyamorous is a pretty general term, there are a million different relationship models that fall under that banner. Bearing that in mind I don't know if we're talking about the same thing. I'm talking about committed relationships, both polyamorous and monogamous.
Because without commitment there cannot be infidelity.
I'm also talking about committed relationships. However, I don't think that's true. You can have a one night stand with someone and then
feel betrayed by them, commitment or no. More importantly, however, I don't buy that this is a linear correlation, I don't buy that more commitment has to come with more fidelity and I don't buy that infidelity signals a lack of commitment. In fact, wouldn't genuine commitment be completely unconditional, entirely independent of what anyone involved actually does? I don't think
that would be particularly healthy, but at the same time what good is trust if you can't trust someone to know when it's okay to break the rules?
BinDipper said:
What if a friend cost you a job opportunity you trusted them with, out of sheer absent mindedness? Would the trust you placed in them not be breached? Would you not be less likely to trust them with such things in the future?
Sure, I would be less likely to trust them, but why would I contextualize that as betrayal? It sounds like a pretty honest mistake. I don't see why an apology wouldn't cut it. Sure, it's a huge failure on their part and I'd be upset, but if I was committed to that friendship why would I not give them the benefit of the doubt, and if they kept making these kinds of mistakes.. well.. it kind of becomes my fault for putting this stuff in their hands.
BinDipper said:
Why is malice the key here? Malice isn't thought to be a common factor in infidelity.
Well.. this is kind of my point. Why would you ever feel betrayed by something which isn't actually meant to hurt you, which as far as I can see isn't actually about you at all? I mean.. I guess if it's some kind of weird revenge sex that would count, but if you
genuinely trusted someone why would anything less even register?
BinDipper said:
I had another question I was going to ask. What if you had a child with someone, they were taking legal and financial responsibility for it along with yourself. And they left, never to see the child or support it financially again, in favor of another relationship?
I'd feel exactly the same as I would if they left to take part in a lifetime mission to Mars. Meaning, I'd feel extremely hurt, but I don't really see why their relationship would come into that.
I don't really have the expectation that anyone else is going to prioritize my happiness over their own. That's my job, as far as I see it. Obviously, in that situation I would want said person to stay and help me raise the kid, but I don't really see why I have the right to demand it or why the failure to do it would constitute a breach of contract, because I don't see where that contract was ever made. Of course, there are things I could demand in law in that situation which would actually be contractual obligations, but those aren't really for my benefit but more for the benefit of the child.
The issue here, again, is that I wouldn't have a child with someone if I thought they were going to bail so if they did bail that to me would violate my sense of who I thought they were, so I guess it would be a betrayal in that sense. But I don't really see why the act itself constitutes betrayal.
BinDipper said:
Jealousy happens because people realise that they can never know their partner like they know themselves. It happens because people realise that ultimately they can't control their partner's actions. It is those two facts that make people fear they will lose their relationship and thus, jealousy.
But if you know that's a possibility, why is it any different from any other bad thing that happens in your life?
BinDipper said:
Trust is a reliance. If you are not relying on your partner to do (or not to do) something then there can't really be any trust.
Why would you ever rely on anyone for anything you aren't prepared for them to fail at it?
That's a pretty cynical view of reality, I'm sure, but it's the only one I feel I can afford.