Beautiful Tragedy said:it's absolutely nothing like that. It's deeper..WAY deeper.Quadocky said:No, being a transsexual is most likely nothing like roleplaying a character in a fandom.TehCookie said:I never could, there is no way to make a male into female or vise versa and doing so is just mutilation. I'm fine if they want to act like the opposite gender, but when you get to the surgery I find that crossing the line. Like how furries have a fursona, and then there's that guy who sewn a dogs face onto his. Then again I'm not attracted to plastic surgery in general, and the more drastic of a change the more of a turn-off it is.
Seems like you are doing it anyway, it just wouldn't be a transsexual thread with out you correcting peopleBeautiful Tragedy said:I won't get into the misinformed statements, as I am not the argumentative type anymore.
Uhh I haven't correct anyone just trying educate. I am not arguing with you or anyone else... but if you think THIS is argumentative... this is nothing. As I said, I won't belabor the point. I am ready to move on and have a sensible discussion. I was only trying to expand the knowledge that some people may lack, or may not have heard about.drisky said:Seems like you are doing it anyway, it just wouldn't be a transsexual thread with out you correcting peopleBeautiful Tragedy said:I won't get into the misinformed statements, as I am not the argumentative type anymore.![]()
To be fair the adult babies (Paraphilic Infantilism [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilic_infantilism]) are a recognised disorder. I'm not a psychologist so I'm not going to pretend my opinions are worth that much but I am a biology student and so I've got to wonder what the biological basis for calling a transgenderism a physical disorder is when it mainly seems to affect the brain. There are developmental disorders based in the brain like autism or dyspraxia so perhaps it should more properly classed alongside those.Beautiful Tragedy said:are those in the DSM? Gender Dysphoria is, and was declassified now that deeper long term study has been done. It is not considered a mental disorder by the mental, and medical health community.JoJo said:Yes, I would not start a serious relationship with anyone who didn't want or couldn't have children, it's that simple. To many people having a family is an important life goal and while adoption is an option, it takes years of jumping through hoops and most adoptive children take a different challenge to raise than biological kids since at the best they've experienced neglect and often much worse abuse.Lieju said:EDIT: Also, to everyone in this thread who said 'I want to have children', would you date someone who can't have children for some reason, or just is very certain they don't want to?
I'm just wondering how many people use that as an excuse...
OT: I would date for short-term if I found them attractive but for long-term, the lack of fertility would rule it out. People are free to choose their own gender and I will respect their choice but I'm some what sceptical about the whole "it's not a mental condition, it's physical," point. There are people who believe they are wrong age (adult babies) or the wrong species (otherkin), do they have a physical problem too?
And I respect your opinion. In a friendship with me though, it wouldn't be something that's a big deal anymore than some of the exact opposite religious and political opinions I share with my current friends. In this case, I wouldn't really focus on you as a female, trans girl, male, etc. I would focus on you as a person, gender be damned. In the case of romance, one of the things I do focus on is sexuality, but for friends, a good personality is all I care about. And in the situation you described, it would just be another thing we share different opinions on, which I think shouldn't exactly be a deal breaker.Beautiful Tragedy said:You have a right to that opinion and that's perfectly fine.. but a lot of trans girls including myself would not associate with someone who claims to be a friend, but sees us as our birth sex and not the gender we truly are.DarthSka said:Nah, couldn't do it. Call me close-minded but if you have an expressed Y-chromosome then to me you are a male/man/guy/boy/dude/bro etc. I wouldn't mind being friends with any, but I just wouldn't be able to consider them an actual woman.
I misspoke i guess it's a chemical one i guess. I don't know exactly..it's definitely not BDD or anything like that. I just know that the medical community no longer considers it a mental illness.JoJo said:To be fair the adult babies (Paraphilic Infantilism [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilic_infantilism]) are a recognised disorder. I'm not a psychologist so I'm not going to pretend my opinions are worth that much but I am a biology student and so I've got to wonder what the biological basis for calling a transgenderism a physical disorder is when it mainly seems to affect the brain. There are developmental disorders based in the brain like autism or dyspraxia so perhaps it should more properly classed alongside those.Beautiful Tragedy said:are those in the DSM? Gender Dysphoria is, and was declassified now that deeper long term study has been done. It is not considered a mental disorder by the mental, and medical health community.JoJo said:Yes, I would not start a serious relationship with anyone who didn't want or couldn't have children, it's that simple. To many people having a family is an important life goal and while adoption is an option, it takes years of jumping through hoops and most adoptive children take a different challenge to raise than biological kids since at the best they've experienced neglect and often much worse abuse.Lieju said:EDIT: Also, to everyone in this thread who said 'I want to have children', would you date someone who can't have children for some reason, or just is very certain they don't want to?
I'm just wondering how many people use that as an excuse...
OT: I would date for short-term if I found them attractive but for long-term, the lack of fertility would rule it out. People are free to choose their own gender and I will respect their choice but I'm some what sceptical about the whole "it's not a mental condition, it's physical," point. There are people who believe they are wrong age (adult babies) or the wrong species (otherkin), do they have a physical problem too?
DarthSka said:And I respect your opinion. In a friendship with me though, it wouldn't be something that's a big deal anymore than some of the exact opposite religious and political opinions I share with my current friends. In this case, I wouldn't really focus on you as a female, trans girl, male, etc. I would focus on you as a person, gender be damned. In the case of romance, one of the things I do focus on is sexuality, but for friends, a good personality is all I care about. And in the situation you described, it would just be another thing we share different opinions on, which I think shouldn't exactly be a deal breaker.
The thing is if someone feels trapped in the wrong gender, they can decide for themselves to change this and be of a different gender. But they can't decide this for everyone else around them, and say that those who don't see them as what they themselves now perceive their gender to be, as close minded and oppressive.drisky said:I don't think anyone is saying that really, any one who does is rather silly. You can't force someone to be a attracted to trans people any more then a trans person can "just deal with it. No one should have to make apologies for their sexuality and that means heterosexuals too. However people go beyond that and add an unnecessary level of hostilely to their answers. I'll use yours as an example.Casual Shinji said:Why do these transgender threads always exude this vibe that not being able to be physically attracted to every human being on the planet makes you a bad person?
Yours was a relatively mild way of putting it, (relative to comparing it to cutting of dog faces, almost everything is mild) but your words still come off as telling transpeople they are delusional. That's the problem. Rather then saying something like "Its not something I could get past physically or sexually", many have to try and act like transpeople are lies in human form. That is the part that offends people, the idea that they are all delusional.Casual Shinji said:No way in hell.
I'm sorry for everyone who feels trapped in the wong gender's physique, but to me if you're a guy then you're a guy. And I'm attracted to girls.
And there's more to it. I find people who have undergone heavy duty plastic surgery horribly unappealing. I wouldn't want to date a man who (surgically) became a woman anymore than I would want to date a woman who (surgically) became a man.
Ahhh you know you love itBeautiful Tragedy said:Such a tease ;P hehe
Ya i do ;PRawne1980 said:Ahhh you know you love itBeautiful Tragedy said:Such a tease ;P hehe
Regardless of anything else you know I think you're a star.
one of the biggest issues with appearance for trans girls is the surgeries are not perfect, and many of us can't afford ALL of them needed to truly be 100% passable. Some people are blessed with feminine features or begin early and hrt has a better effect.Gottesstrafe said:I've yet to see a truly convincing transsexual. Despite modern advancements in hormone therapy and plastic surgery, the telltale signs are still there (especially noticeable if you're flat out told that they're trans).
Fair enough, I have nothing against trangender people personally, my scientific side is just curious exactly how such a phenomena arises and what it should be classified as. To be honest I don't put much trust in the DSM since it's written by fallible humans and depends a lot on the society's attitudes and norms, hence why both homosexuality and gender dysphoria have been listed in the past.Beautiful Tragedy said:I misspoke i guess it's a chemical one i guess. I don't know exactly..it's definitely not BDD or anything like that. I just know that the medical community no longer considers it a mental illness.JoJo said:To be fair the adult babies (Paraphilic Infantilism [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilic_infantilism]) are a recognised disorder. I'm not a psychologist so I'm not going to pretend my opinions are worth that much but I am a biology student and so I've got to wonder what the biological basis for calling a transgenderism a physical disorder is when it mainly seems to affect the brain. There are developmental disorders based in the brain like autism or dyspraxia so perhaps it should more properly classed alongside those.Beautiful Tragedy said:are those in the DSM? Gender Dysphoria is, and was declassified now that deeper long term study has been done. It is not considered a mental disorder by the mental, and medical health community.JoJo said:Yes, I would not start a serious relationship with anyone who didn't want or couldn't have children, it's that simple. To many people having a family is an important life goal and while adoption is an option, it takes years of jumping through hoops and most adoptive children take a different challenge to raise than biological kids since at the best they've experienced neglect and often much worse abuse.Lieju said:EDIT: Also, to everyone in this thread who said 'I want to have children', would you date someone who can't have children for some reason, or just is very certain they don't want to?
I'm just wondering how many people use that as an excuse...
OT: I would date for short-term if I found them attractive but for long-term, the lack of fertility would rule it out. People are free to choose their own gender and I will respect their choice but I'm some what sceptical about the whole "it's not a mental condition, it's physical," point. There are people who believe they are wrong age (adult babies) or the wrong species (otherkin), do they have a physical problem too?
(Terminology note: "sex" refers to biological characteristics, while "gender" refers to cultural performances such as dress and behavior.)Casual Shinji said:Why is this not okay? Why is it okay for transgenders to place so much importance on gender (why else would they get a sex change), but not for everyone else?bananafishtoday said:No, it's totally ok and perfectly natural to be attracted to people based on appearance. And if you find out someone you were attracted to is transwoman, and that's a dealbreaker for you, better to be honest.Casual Shinji said:But what does any of that have to do with being physically attracted to someone? I'm not attracted to 90-year old ladies either, it doesn't mean I think they're sub-human.
I can't force my body to be attracted to someone when I don't find them attractive. It is okay to not be sexually attracted to someone based on how they look. Maybe this makes me extremely shallow, but I guess I'm just that close-minded.
What's not ok are pithy comments about how "if you're a guy you're a guy."
I get what you're saying about the DSM, but that's how people determine what's a mental illness and what's not.. noone knows for sure, but i know how I feel... I am not dysphoric, I know what's up with me, and I am fixing it.JoJo said:Fair enough, I have nothing against trangender people personally, my scientific side is just curious exactly how such a phenomena arises and what it should be classified as. To be honest I don't put much trust in the DSM since it's written by fallible humans and depends a lot on the societies attitudes, hence why both homosexuality and gender dysphoria have been listed in the past.Beautiful Tragedy said:I misspoke i guess it's a chemical one i guess. I don't know exactly..it's definitely not BDD or anything like that. I just know that the medical community no longer considers it a mental illness.JoJo said:To be fair the adult babies (Paraphilic Infantilism [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilic_infantilism]) are a recognised disorder. I'm not a psychologist so I'm not going to pretend my opinions are worth that much but I am a biology student and so I've got to wonder what the biological basis for calling a transgenderism a physical disorder is when it mainly seems to affect the brain. There are developmental disorders based in the brain like autism or dyspraxia so perhaps it should more properly classed alongside those.Beautiful Tragedy said:are those in the DSM? Gender Dysphoria is, and was declassified now that deeper long term study has been done. It is not considered a mental disorder by the mental, and medical health community.JoJo said:Yes, I would not start a serious relationship with anyone who didn't want or couldn't have children, it's that simple. To many people having a family is an important life goal and while adoption is an option, it takes years of jumping through hoops and most adoptive children take a different challenge to raise than biological kids since at the best they've experienced neglect and often much worse abuse.Lieju said:EDIT: Also, to everyone in this thread who said 'I want to have children', would you date someone who can't have children for some reason, or just is very certain they don't want to?
I'm just wondering how many people use that as an excuse...
OT: I would date for short-term if I found them attractive but for long-term, the lack of fertility would rule it out. People are free to choose their own gender and I will respect their choice but I'm some what sceptical about the whole "it's not a mental condition, it's physical," point. There are people who believe they are wrong age (adult babies) or the wrong species (otherkin), do they have a physical problem too?
I take offence to this. There are plenty of people who cross-dress, to varying degrees, who have perfectly sound relationships. It ain't just blokes in drag.Tanis said:Not cross dressing, because that's fun no matter who you are, but an physically/medically changed person.