No, 'smugness at it's best' would be telling gamers on other platforms what they should be happy with.Witty Name Here said:Honestly, this is smugness at it's best
No, 'smugness at it's best' would be telling gamers on other platforms what they should be happy with.Witty Name Here said:Honestly, this is smugness at it's best
Oh, ouch, locked framerate, locked resolution and nearly the winner in worst online DRM to deal with. The trouble is that I've been looking for a good hardcore hack and slash rpg for a very long time and this looks like it was designed to fill that role perfectly. Difficult decision.Waaghpowa said:Nopegetoffmycloud said:I think it uses steam now they changed it after the outcry.
Read the bottom of "System requirements".
Additional: Online play requires software installation of and log-in to Games For Windows - LIVE
Come on, how bad is GFWL really? I think everyone over exaggerates. I have an account and it is by no means "draconian". It's extremely easy. You load your game, sign in, and play. There, done. Just because it may not be a very graceful type DRM doesn't mean it's the worst thing to happen ever. I use it for GTA4 and RES 5. Not a problem to be had.Do4600 said:Oh, ouch, locked framerate, locked resolution and nearly the winner in worst online DRM to deal with. The trouble is that I've been looking for a good hardcore hack and slash rpg for a very long time and this looks like it was designed to fill that role perfectly. Difficult decision.Waaghpowa said:Nopegetoffmycloud said:I think it uses steam now they changed it after the outcry.
Read the bottom of "System requirements".
Additional: Online play requires software installation of and log-in to Games For Windows - LIVE
Oh. My. God. Do you even know what framerate is? You really, truly can't get your head around the idea that no one here cares about graphics, can you? So you're just assuming that framerate = graphics because 'It must be what those spoilt/elitist pc gamers are complaining about!'.thethird0611 said:Also, if you dont care about the graphics, why the hell are you against the game then? GFWL is the only real argument ive heard that even makes sense.
I was referring to the game. For some reason I didn't even think the game had cutscenes actually, apart from possibly an opening one. This is just further evidence you don't know what framerate is and are commenting out of ignorance.thethird0611 said:Ha... Hahahaha.... Hahahahahahahahahaha. Your very first sentence just kills me. Dark Souls is all about the game, and there are very very very few cutscene's, thats why you have to pay attention to the minor details!
I'm sorry, I didn't realise the game was free. They're not doing charity you know, this makes them money (although I question how much now that it's confirmed the game will be unplayable for a lot of people). If they want my money, they have to offer something that's worth it, it's really that simple.thethird0611 said:Actually, let me rephrase your metaphor. Im like a parent who takes a kid to a nice steak house, then the kid complains that he wants a better steak, and then tells him to enjoy is freaking 15 dollar steak. Enjoy the greatness of what it is, not what your spoiled for.
Thanks, I like to think I don't deserve to be physically assaulted by a game. This game is really not consequential to me, there was just a big fuss about it so I thought 'I may as well have a look' and after this I've just thought 'Meh, I can live without'.thethird0611 said:You know what, im glad YOU arent going to play it. You dont deserve it.
That doesn't even deserve a response. I'm just going to say Sturgeon's Law, and leave you to your own devices. That is, assuming you don't go off and ask someone else what to think about it.thethird0611 said:But its people like YOU who cant enjoy a game that has gotten rave reviews,
If it's at 30fps, it isn't some of the best gameplay, and you simply can't argue that. The game might be good if it were a game rather than a slideshow, but I can easily get a better experience from pretty much every game ever. Because pretty much every game ever doesn't shoot itself in the foot by putting itself at a painful framerate, even console ports.thethird0611 said:has some of the BEST gameplay, and just because YOU cant get your framerate higher, your not going to play it.
Have you even played a game at 30 FPS? Or are you just assuming it's unplayable because 60 FPS feels so good? There's a nice videognihton said:Snip
here that shows you how it plays at that "oh so unplayable" 30 FPS. And please stop referring to the game a slideshow. The analogy is so idiotic.Witty Name Here said:<youtube=QC8c0ZrISk0>
See that boss fight? That's in 30 fps. It's not a "slide show", it's not "So Slow you might as well watch paint dry". It's 30 fps. It's average. Oh well.
To use an analogy: Stop complaining that you've got the same meal as everyone else and not one that comes with someone to wipe the grease off your face for you.
Not you too! Stop it. Please. Stop. Just, augh.... Watch the video and stop...peruvianskys said:Snip
This exactly. The problem isn't people having unreasonably high expectations, it's console gamers being exposed almost entirely to tripe to the point that they think it's unreasonable (or 'entitled' as it's the ignorants' favourite buzzword) to expect something that isn't terrible.peruvianskys said:The problem isn't that PC gamers have a sense of entitlement; it's that console gamers have grown used to games that run like shit.
I actually recently bought L.A Noire on Steam, being impressed by what I'd seen and heard of it, I entered the game and immediately noticed in the opening cutscene that the game was a slideshow. I didn't even know that the game limited framerate, but I could tell in less than a second because it was that painfully noticeable.Scumpernickle said:Have you even played a game at 30 FPS? Or are you just assuming it's unplayable because 60 FPS feels so good? There's a nice videognihton said:Snip
Yeah, consoles are running on dated hardware, and yes, any computer built after 2009 outperforms them, but the games aren't "shit". Graphics, framerate, control, functionality, whatever you want to talk about, is not shit on consoles. Would you call a NES shit? How about a PS2? So why call something dated shit? Just because it inconveniences you now?gnihton said:This exactly. The problem isn't people having unreasonably high expectations, it's console gamers being exposed almost entirely to tripe to the point that they think it's unreasonable (or 'entitled' as it's the ignorants' favourite buzzword) to expect something that isn't terrible.peruvianskys said:The problem isn't that PC gamers have a sense of entitlement; it's that console gamers have grown used to games that run like shit.
I guess you didn't read my slideshow rant there.gnihton said:Snip
Meaning of Karma said:peruvianskys said:Okay I get it everyone is going to say "PC elitist" but I don't care, this is ridiculous. A PC game that is locked at 720p and 30fps is unacceptable. Those who play consoles might not get that because they're used to things that look terrible and run like slideshows, but it's not my fault that you guys have low standards.
PS3.gnihton said:thethird0611 said:Are you people fucking bonkers? How on earth is 30 FPS a slideshow?thethird0611 said:If it's at 30fps, it isn't some of the best gameplay, and you simply can't argue that. The game might be good if it were a game rather than a slideshow, but I can easily get a better experience from pretty much every game ever. Because pretty much every game ever doesn't shoot itself in the foot by putting itself at a painful framerate, even console ports.thethird0611 said:has some of the BEST gameplay, and just because YOU cant get your framerate higher, your not going to play it.
Because of monitors don't work the same way a TV does , plus you are sitting a lot lot closer to it generally with a PC so it's blindingly obvious .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interlaced_video
TVs use interlacing pc monitors do not, pc monitors us e progressive scanning. The difference is like night and day at 30fps, on a tv it's effectively 60 fps because of the way interlacing works, monitor users on the other hand have no such benefit.
Oh plus of there is fps drop which is quite possible with the way the game runs (dark town) then its going to look like a PowerPoint presentation.
I have not played a game that was capped at 30 FPS although sometimes my game spikes and the FPS goes that low and to be quite frank it is painful when that happens. As for your video, when I set it to 720p and open it up on full screen ya it is certainly playable but it is not something I would pay $40 for.Scumpernickle said:Have you even played a game at 30 FPS? Or are you just assuming it's unplayable because 60 FPS feels so good? There's a nice video
Things like FPS and texture resolutions can be worked around assuming that GFWL doesn't pick it up as something modified and bans your ass. My reason for not getting it is that I just don't like GFWL, poor performance is partly a deal breaker for me too, but as I said, you can generally work around those.Do4600 said:Oh, ouch, locked framerate, locked resolution and nearly the winner in worst online DRM to deal with. The trouble is that I've been looking for a good hardcore hack and slash rpg for a very long time and this looks like it was designed to fill that role perfectly. Difficult decision.
It's not literally a slide show but they refer to the amount of time between frames which can affect the perception of movement. Ever had an experience with consistently higher frame rates? In a lot of cases, being restricted to 30 fps not only affects visual quality, but can also cause a significant amount of input lag. People playing with controllers don't usually notice because of analogue sticks. The dead zone with controllers offsets it and you don't notice it as much.Meaning of Karma said:Are you people fucking bonkers? How on earth is 30 FPS a slideshow?