cjacks said:
Lovely Mixture, what is that crap??
PC gamers begged and pleaded for a port, and they got one in a timely manner,
Yeah timeliness is not always the best thing, in fact it has ruined games (and others things) due to publishers repeatedly asking for impossible deadlines. I'd rather get a finished and refined product then get a sub-par product.
cjacks said:
it is horrifically conceded for you to expect FROM to put in the work to make an optimized port,
Why is that conceded? People have released bad ports previously and people have complained. Doesn't make it right or wrong, but it's clearly an issue.
cjacks said:
when what they would get for their hard work is post like this discouraging people from buying the game.
No one is telling anyone what to do. I simply said what I'm going to do.
cjacks said:
How can you expect a company to sink money and manpower into optizing a game for modern graphics when PC gamers will refuse to buy a game because they heard from some reviews that the framer ate isn't flawless.
Easy, actually make the game optimized. People would respect that, and might buy it. Shouldn't they try and open the game up for all audiences?
cjacks said:
Look up the RockPaperShotgun hands on review right now and tell me where it says there that the game isnt worth every penny?
Irrelevant. I didn't even say the game was bad.
cjacks said:
My point is that PC gamers have come to equate graphics with quality and they have little respect for how graphics improvements work.
And as I meant to imply if it were not obvious, you are generalizing PC gamers. PC gamers is close to becoming a buzzword at this point, everyone has their own definition.
I play on console and PC, I don't care about the graphics, I care about consistency.
cjacks said:
Now you say that you cannot support this behavior?
I don't exactlt, but as I said, the issue isn't as simple as the graphics.
cjacks said:
Who are you? It is one thing to criticize a game developer for making a bad design choice and another entirely to complain cause you don't think they kissed your ass quite hard enough
Rant over
Those can't be mutually exclusive?
For many people in this thread, not allowing higher resolution is An INCREDIBLY bad design choice. Just because you don't think it is doesn't make it the "truth."
cjacks said:
I absolutely loved Dark Souls, and i am just a little angered when I hear people say they won't play it for non gameplay related reasons.
Fine, then stop equating "I'm not going to buy/play it" with "I'm not going to buy/play it cause the graphics aren't perfect"
I love Dark Souls just as much as you do, that's why I feel so strongly that the experience should be optimized well for the PC.
thethird0611 said:
Oh, so PC gamers are spoiled then? You know, I wonder why its always "Console gamers only care about graphics and not story!", and not the other way around.
The frame rate and resolution (which are exactly the same on consoles), look beautiful. This is a company who knows nothing about PC games, and is making it look like the work of art it is on consoles, which is still amazingly beautiful.
No, I take your response as "We just care about graphics more than you, its not the difficulty, or story, or any of that, its the graphics." Hell, I just cant wait until you play the game and say "Wait, theres no story", because you care to much about graphics and not the details.
Strawman much? Yes we get it, you think the resolution and frame-rate are fine.