Dark Souls Port Brings Console Problems to PC

[Lovely Mixture]

First of all, I understand breaking my comments down into smaller sections, but I believe you may have distorted my views in several places with this feature and I would appreciate it if you would include a full text in these situations in the future.

I didn't do anything except analyze what you wrote, the text is there in pieces for ease of reading. But if you want to recant anything you said, then by all means do so.

Secondly, I believe there was an apology for some of those comments which you failed to post as well.

Just because I didn't quote that, doesn't mean I didn't acknowledge it. I ended my post to you on a lighter note to do that, I'm sorry if that wasn't clear.

I'd say just to keep your projecting in order, it creates some argumentative confusion.

 

[RN7]

What's so wrong with 30fps and console-based graphics if the PC version has been tweaked and adds new content? I don't really see how this can be complaint worthy. Sure, they probably could have made a better port, but it's not like they just sat on their thumbs until the last minute and changed all the xbox controls to mouse and keyboard- they still added things and fixed things. I'd wait and reserve judgement until after the game comes out.

 

[SL33TBL1ND]

Well, it's on GFWL anyway so I probably wasn't going to get it anyway. I'll stick to my PS3 copy.

 

[Daystar Clarion]

PC Players:* What? It won't be better than the console versions? What is this blasphemy against the glorious PC gaming master race?!

Unless you're parodying your own views on this, this is not about having a "better" version than consoles. This is about having a good version on PC. And these completely shitty visual specs are anything but good. Never mind the actual graphics of the game, which already people weren't even expecting would get reworked (stuff like textures getting an HD treatment at the minimum).

Are you saying that having the same version of the game as the consoles makes it a bad PC game? The version that reaped positive reviews worldwide, received awards for the musical score, level design and atmosphere, and has some of the best boss fights of this generation?

None of that praise is directed at the graphics, and why should it be? The gameplay is solid, the atmosphere is excellent and the level design is great. Is making it look pretty really all that important? I certainly don't think it is.

You.

I like you.

You should stay a while

If your experience with a game like Dark Souls is easily ruined by it being 30fps instead of 60fps, then you're doing it wrong

 

[Baresark]

It honestly sounds to me that the PC version is far superior to the game that I played for 130 hours on my PS3.

It sounds like it isn't actually superior, the framerate is simply smoother because it's running on a faster machine.

If you haven't played it, that is actually superior.

 

[Marcus Thomas]

PC Players:* What? It won't be better than the console versions? What is this blasphemy against the glorious PC gaming master race?!

Unless you're parodying your own views on this, this is not about having a "better" version than consoles. This is about having a good version on PC. And these completely shitty visual specs are anything but good. Never mind the actual graphics of the game, which already people weren't even expecting would get reworked (stuff like textures getting an HD treatment at the minimum).

Are you saying that having the same version of the game as the consoles makes it a bad PC game? The version that reaped positive reviews worldwide, received awards for the musical score, level design and atmosphere, and has some of the best boss fights of this generation?

None of that praise is directed at the graphics, and why should it be? The gameplay is solid, the atmosphere is excellent and the level design is great. Is making it look pretty really all that important? I certainly don't think it is.

I'd say that it's pretty bad if they failed to meet a basic standard established over fifteen years ago. Nobody's complaining that they didn't make it look better, the issue is that a game with such potential has been needlessly limited.

The beauty is already there, all From Software needs to do is open the door.

 

[thesilentman]

But the average game runs on 1920x1080 60+ FPS on my PC, while this won't.
So every car in the analogy is a Ferrari. It's just that that one doesn't work as it should.

The average PC game, maybe. But you're not getting a PC game, you're getting a port of a Console game.

Dude, this is just pathetic now. Did you seriously wrote that or did you try to make a bad joke? Practically every game is a console port now.
Crysis 2 - console port
CoD - console port
Assassin's Creed - console port
Skyrim - console port (!!!)
Oblivion - console port (!!!)
The list could go on.
They were designed for consoles and later on ported to the PC.

All those games had at least changeable resolution and didn't have a FPS limit. Crysis had even a special patch for the PC version.
You know why? They had people who actually know how to port do the porting.

Oh wow, let me search Google for that PC exclusives chart.

...

Hwup, found it: [link]http://www.medievalfuture.com/tilt/images/ibkOmw.jpg[/link]

 

[RhombusHatesYou]

I would have been slightly disappointed by the news but seeing as their publisher insists on using GFWL I wasn't going to get it unless/until there was a GFWL removing crack available.

 

[thesilentman]

PC Players:* What? It won't be better than the console versions? What is this blasphemy against the glorious PC gaming master race?!

Unless you're parodying your own views on this, this is not about having a "better" version than consoles. This is about having a good version on PC. And these completely shitty visual specs are anything but good. Never mind the actual graphics of the game, which already people weren't even expecting would get reworked (stuff like textures getting an HD treatment at the minimum).

Are you saying that having the same version of the game as the consoles makes it a bad PC game? The version that reaped positive reviews worldwide, received awards for the musical score, level design and atmosphere, and has some of the best boss fights of this generation?

None of that praise is directed at the graphics, and why should it be? The gameplay is solid, the atmosphere is excellent and the level design is great. Is making it look pretty really all that important? I certainly don't think it is.

You.

I like you.

You should stay a while

If your experience with a game like Dark Souls is easily ruined by it being 30fps instead of 60fps, then you're doing it wrong

Seconded. I waited for the PC version just to have a personal experience with one of the best games this gen. I don't care if it's capped to 30 FPS or I can't play with 1680x1050 resolution. I just want to experience it up close and personal, something that only happens on PC (for me).

 

[RhombusHatesYou]

The problem with that being that From Software has no experience with the PC, so they have no idea how the knob on that door works.

That's a bullshit excuse.

That isn't to say it's not true, or even part of the reason, but as an excuse or justification it's a load of old wank.

*does some quick wiki'ing*

Righto, so it was Bandai Namco's decision to bring the game to PC... that explains a lot. I can't see those fuckheads ponying up enough money for From to anything more than a quick and dirty port. No outsourcing, no contracting a few PC specialists, no time to familiarise themselves with the platfom, no fucking anything.


To be honest, Bandai Namco are doing everything exactly the way they should if they want to ensure they're never asked to bring a game to PC ever again.

 

[thethird0611]

Oh, so PC gamers are spoiled then? You know, I wonder why its always "Console gamers only care about graphics and not story!", and not the other way around.

The frame rate and resolution (which are exactly the same on consoles), look beautiful. This is a company who knows nothing about PC games, and is making it look like the work of art it is on consoles, which is still amazingly beautiful.

No, I take your response as "We just care about graphics more than you, its not the difficulty, or story, or any of that, its the graphics." Hell, I just cant wait until you play the game and say "Wait, theres no story", because you care to much about graphics and not the details.

Well, I'm bloody sorry that I like to play games rather than slideshows.

You can keep your shitty low standards if you want, but trying to make anyone else out to be 'spoiled' because they don't share your poor eyesight is pathetic, you're like a blind parent demanding to have your children blinded because you don't want them to lead a better life than yourself.

Edit: And to reiterate, I couldn't care less about the graphics, which is apparently something you've ignored from every single post from a pc gamer so far. In fact, you seem to be obsessed by the idea that pc gamers only care about graphics... do I sense some envy?

Ha... Hahahaha.... Hahahahahahahahahaha. Your very first sentence just kills me. Dark Souls is all about the game, and there are very very very few cutscene's, thats why you have to pay attention to the minor details!


Actually, let me rephrase your metaphor. Im like a parent who takes a kid to a nice steak house, then the kid complains that he wants a better steak, and then tells him to enjoy is freaking 15 dollar steak. Enjoy the greatness of what it is, not what your spoiled for.

You know what, im glad YOU arent going to play it. You dont deserve it.

And no, to your edit, I dont mind PC gamers. I love the platform, as I play a few games on it. But its people like YOU who cant enjoy a game that has gotten rave reviews, has some of the BEST gameplay, and just because YOU cant get your framerate higher, your not going to play it.

Im happy PC gamers are getting this port, they get to enjoy the greatness of it.

Also, if you dont care about the graphics, why the hell are you against the game then? GFWL is the only real argument ive heard that even makes sense.

 

[RhombusHatesYou]

To be honest, Bandai Namco are doing everything exactly the way they should if they want to ensure they're never asked to bring a game to PC ever again.

I've never understood the aversion to PC games in Japan. Maybe it's a cultural thing.

It's not a 'japanese aversion to PC games' issue it's a 'a number of publishers and developers are dicks to PC gaming' issue. Bandai Namco are one of that number.

Of course, I'm already biased against them because of their lawsuits against CD Projekt.