Then don't buy it.rolfwesselius said:i did not spend 600 dollars on a pc to play games with 30 fps.The Plunk said:"Oh no, 30 fps! Whatever will we doooooooooooooooooooooo?!"
The game was perfectly playable on consoles.
The game will be the same, if not slightly better, on PC.
Therefore it will be perfectly playable on PC.
I need to get a tv that has that and plug my pc into it.AC10 said:Not only this, but I'm amazed people are unaware that (some) HD TV's are not just big computer monitors. They interpolate images when they framerate is lower than their prescribed framerate that gives the image more of an illusion of smoothness. It's called Motion Interpolation and it's a real thing, and is not present in PC monitors. There's a reason, besides distance, why 30FPS looks good on my TV, but looks choppy on my monitor.G32420NL said:bit dissapointed at some of the reactions about pc elitsm, i understand where they are coming from and altough i am a pc only gamer (financial reasons) i can see the fun and advantages of consoles and enjoy them when visiting friends. the 30 frames are really not a problem, but the resolution is a bit of a hitch, in the sense that on a tv the scaling and distance from the tv help alot but this may not be the case sitting close to the monitor.
I agree. Not all hope is lost XDG32420NL said:I agree with your point to a degree, it's why bf3 and cod on console both feel good to me and it could never ruin my fun when a game is capped at 30 fps. My point is not that 30 fps is not enough. but it is a fact that the difference between 30 and 60 fps can be noticed and can create a different feel. Not needed maybe, with that i agree but it is there.Rainforce said:I see the problem, and would agree, but:G32420NL said:But a movie is something different from a game :S in a movie you dont have to react to events, but as i said, i dont mind 30 frames as long as it stays in that neigborhood.
I find that 30 frames does give a game a filmic feel while 60 fps gives a bit more realism en fluid feel.
experience (and of course observations from 3rd parties) tells me that 30 FPS are good enough, as you calculate most of the stuff that is going on in the game subconsciously instead of actually seeing it (which is really shitty from our brains and we all like to be in denial about it). so as long as it's above 20-something you're surprisingly fine.
And i whould just like to say that not all people with pc's are elitists, i do like the perks of pc gaming and love the tech stuff but it always takes backseat to the gameplay experience
Expecting a port that's up to the (already low) industry standards is not hypocritical.chadachada123 said:However, if you were one of the ones that begged FROM to release on PC, then recognize that you are a massive hypocrite.
It doesn't change the fact that PC gamers will still be complaining about getting a superior version of the game, despite begging for the game.Thoric485 said:Expecting a port that's up to the (already low) industry standards is not hypocritical.chadachada123 said:However, if you were one of the ones that begged FROM to release on PC, then recognize that you are a massive hypocrite.
And it was clear that much of the hype came from the prospect of a 1080p 60FPS Blighttown.
I can run every console game i throw at my pc with 60 fps there is no reason i can only play this this one with only 30 fps.The Plunk said:That's called cutting off your nose to spite your face. You're going to miss out on a great game, just because you refuse to play a game at 30 fps, even though that's a perfectly playable framerate.rolfwesselius said:i did not spend 600 dollars on a pc to play games with 30 fps.The Plunk said:"Oh no, 30 fps! Whatever will we doooooooooooooooooooooo?!"
The game was perfectly playable on consoles.
The game will be the same, if not slightly better, on PC.
Therefore it will be perfectly playable on PC.
Also $600 is not that much for a PC.
If it's not optimized, I fail to see how it's notably superior.chadachada123 said:It doesn't change the fact that PC gamers will still be complaining about getting a superior version of the game, despite begging for the game.
There will be lagless Blighttown, it'll just be capped at 30fps. Why videophiles ***** about 30fps is beyond me, but regardless, it's still a superior version to the ~15fps that 360 gamers got.
Well if they won't play or try the game at all, that's a different story.cjacks said:Otherwise you are judging a game solely on graphics and you can see my previous post for a further course of action.
That's the lamest and most thoughtless run-on-the-mill response to a PC game related thread like this one there is. It borders on trolling.Kheapathic said:You know I don't think it's elitism or entitlement as much as it looks like. It's everyone trying to justify their investment. Try playing the game to have fun, not to justify your shitty attitude and the rig you spent so much money on.