E3: Wii U Lineup Impresses

Ninjamedic

New member
Dec 8, 2009
2,569
0
0
similar.squirrel said:
Ninjamedic said:
Wii U..... Really? Really?!

That's it, I am definitely building a gaming PC now.
I know, right? A console with such a preposterous name cannot be good, because that would be so gay and unLeet.
......Sorry, I was joking but it came off as pretentious. But still until a Star Fox game is announced I see no reason for me to buy it.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Wii U, seriously now, can't you hire someone with good ideas.

But does anyone see this thing taking off?
People who wanted proper games already have the equivalent console that will have all the same games, so... why would anyone switch camps.
And noone mentioned the price tag on this one, I imagine it will be a hefty one since they just started making them.
 

scar_47

New member
Sep 25, 2010
319
0
0
So nintendo final enters the current generation market too bad it a few years to late. Still not interested in a console thats exactly like what we've already got with a few gimmicks thrown in, their finally supporting more than the casual crowd but at this point I think the damage has been done, the line up merely includes multiplatform releases available to everyone else and then the same rehash of nintendo titles we always get. I see nothing to be wowed about.
 

DanDeFool

Elite Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,891
0
41
Ninjamedic said:
Wii U..... Really? Really?!
It makes more sense if you think of Nintendo's relationship with third-party developers until now, which has essentially been to "Wii on U".
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
You've been playing Battlefield 3 and Ninja Gaiden 3 for half a decade? I am impressed.
 

Semitendon

New member
Aug 4, 2009
359
0
0
I have a bad feeling about this.

I thought the Wii was just barely acceptable as a party console, and this was aided by the fact that the PS3 and Xbox 360 were pretty much solo only.

So if you wanted a fun, goofy, system that you only intended to use a few times a month with a group of friends, the Wii was perfect.

If you wanted to play games, you chose the Xbox or PS.

The new system doesn't bring to mind, light fun at a party, as much as unwieldy controller trying to play real games.

Personally I love the Xbox 360 controller the best because it's size and shape fit well with my hands. The WiiU looks like it is more like holding a book than a controller, and as comfortable as I am with books, the design doesn't look like something that will blend well with games. If you add in the Wii's controller having it's simplistic and easy to hold design, and couple that with the "good for parties" aspect, it appears the new controller will single handedly cause the WiiU to bomb.

Let's face it, a lot of people bought the Wii because of it's family style and activity based games, and it's easy to learn/use controller. The new console has neither.

The only other group they can sell to, is the hardcore gamer group. Reality is, they have already lost that battle.

The WiiU is Nintendo showing up late to the game, with a system that does what everyone else was doing five years ago, and a controller that destroyes Nintendo's one saving grace, it's group friendly and simple style.
 

hamsterkilla

Battlefield veteran
Aug 11, 2009
68
0
0
josemlopes said:
Melopahn said:
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Its all sorts of cool right up until you remember you've had an Xbox360 or PS3 for a few years.
Exactly, I dont get why people are excited with this, these game will launch on the other consoles, the ones that already exist for years. Also, Wii-U wont be released this year so some games will be launched later then the other versions. Nintendo seems to be always one step behind.
Thats true but most people buy a Nintendo console in order to play First party Nintendo games. So the ability to play the same games as ps3 and xbox as well means I wont have to change consoles all the time.

Hopefully this console can remove the bad taste that the Wii sadly, left in my mouth. I was quite impressed. =)
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
hamsterkilla said:
josemlopes said:
Melopahn said:
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Its all sorts of cool right up until you remember you've had an Xbox360 or PS3 for a few years.
Exactly, I dont get why people are excited with this, these game will launch on the other consoles, the ones that already exist for years. Also, Wii-U wont be released this year so some games will be launched later then the other versions. Nintendo seems to be always one step behind.
Thats true but most people buy a Nintendo console in order to play First party Nintendo games. So the ability to play the same games as ps3 and xbox as well means I wont have to change consoles all the time.

Hopefully this console can remove the bad taste that the Wii sadly, left in my mouth. I was quite impressed. =)
Playing the first party Nintendo games isnt enough motivation to buy a new console, thats the only reason for anyone that has an Xbox or PS3 to buy it, and how many people dont own one?
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
josemlopes said:
Melopahn said:
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Its all sorts of cool right up until you remember you've had an Xbox360 or PS3 for a few years.
Exactly, I dont get why people are excited with this, these game will launch on the other consoles, the ones that already exist for years. Also, Wii-U wont be released this year so some games will be launched later then the other versions. Nintendo seems to be always one step behind.
This has (at least tentatively) persuaded me not to buy a PS3 or a 360 in the coming months. Not everyone has more than one gaming system. I'll more than likely be picking this up next year. Yeah, I'll be playing some games for the first time that have existed for a while. Are you interested in playing any of the God of War/Metal Gear Solid/Splinter Cell collections coming out for PS3 and XBox? Those games are going to sell.

The point Nintendo was making was that they aren't blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying "publisher X supports us." They almost always release their systems in the Fall, which means we more than likely have over a year until the release. Do you really think Nintendo and their recently reunited third parties won't hold some of their cards close to the chest until next year's E3, as they have with absolutely every single launch?

Prediction: Flagship Nintendo titles will be announced between here and then, and then delayed into well into 2013. Most of the 3rd party games already announced will be right on time, and we'll see more than a few surprises. Fingers crossed for F-Zero-Wii-X and Starfox-U.
 

lord.jeff

New member
Oct 27, 2010
1,468
0
0
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
So we had to wait 5 years to play those games, I wonder how long you have to wait before you can play Zelda and Metriod Prime. Trustfully I'm not behind the new console either a just felt like making a dickish remark.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
funguy2121 said:
josemlopes said:
Melopahn said:
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Its all sorts of cool right up until you remember you've had an Xbox360 or PS3 for a few years.
Exactly, I dont get why people are excited with this, these game will launch on the other consoles, the ones that already exist for years. Also, Wii-U wont be released this year so some games will be launched later then the other versions. Nintendo seems to be always one step behind.
This has (at least tentatively) persuaded me not to buy a PS3 or a 360 in the coming months. Not everyone has more than one gaming system. I'll more than likely be picking this up next year. Yeah, I'll be playing some games for the first time that have existed for a while. Are you interested in playing any of the God of War/Metal Gear Solid/Splinter Cell collections coming out for PS3 and XBox? Those games are going to sell.

The point Nintendo was making was that they aren't blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying "publisher X supports us." They almost always release their systems in the Fall, which means we more than likely have over a year until the release. Do you really think Nintendo and their recently reunited third parties won't hold some of their cards close to the chest until next year's E3, as they have with absolutely every single launch?

Prediction: Flagship Nintendo titles will be announced between here and then, and then delayed into well into 2013. Most of the 3rd party games already announced will be right on time, and we'll see more than a few surprises. Fingers crossed for F-Zero-Wii-X and Starfox-U.
If you dont own an Xbox or a PS3 why buy a Wii-U? It will probably be more expensive and have a lot fewer games. I really dont see the point unless you really like the first party games. Thats a perfectly good reason but c'mon, they are terribly late and I would prefer that they waited and just brought a true next gen console alongside with Microsoft and Sony.
 

twm1709

New member
Nov 19, 2009
477
0
0
impressive lineup, almost enough to make me overlook the godawful name of this console. Seriously, can you imagine yourself saying it out loud in the years to come?
Not that naming a portable console after a bottle of water is any better, mind...
 

SupabadMan

New member
Feb 26, 2010
238
0
0
So the launch titles are something the other competitors are already having and looks just as good as the current gen,has a blocky, HUGE controller and has a name that sounds like a 2 year old came up with?

Fuck that shit.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
Saying "they all look as good as the PS3" isn't saying much when current gen consoles will be obsolete within the next two to three years. Meanwhile Sony and Microsoft will have consoles with more power, storage and graphical fidelity than anything they have now whilst the WiiU will be playing catch-up with last year's hardware. No thanks.
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
Balobo said:
Macrobstar said:
airwolfe591 said:
Even though I'm not interested at all in the WiiU or 3DS, I do feel that Nintendo Came out on top this E3.
This new console basically screams to me "Look we can play the same games as the other consoles now" I really dont think they where on top, not with the Vita and all the exclusives microsoft and sony have
Microsoft had exclusives?
Hahaha a few, but sony had loads
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
I can't belive that Nintendo, somehow, came up with a worse name than Wii, but other than that, I'm really, really excited for it. Darksiders 2?, Batman Arkham City?, Metro?, Ninja Gaiden 3?? Battlefield 3!??, I'm sold.

As long as it's more comfortable than the N64 controller, I'm cool with it. Also, I don't mind if it's a bit too heavy, I like heavy controllers, that's why I didn't liked the original SixAxis for the PS3.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
josemlopes said:
funguy2121 said:
josemlopes said:
Melopahn said:
Low Key said:
Impressive? I guess to people who only play on Nintendo consoles. The rest of us have been playing these games for a half a decade.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Its all sorts of cool right up until you remember you've had an Xbox360 or PS3 for a few years.
Exactly, I dont get why people are excited with this, these game will launch on the other consoles, the ones that already exist for years. Also, Wii-U wont be released this year so some games will be launched later then the other versions. Nintendo seems to be always one step behind.
This has (at least tentatively) persuaded me not to buy a PS3 or a 360 in the coming months. Not everyone has more than one gaming system. I'll more than likely be picking this up next year. Yeah, I'll be playing some games for the first time that have existed for a while. Are you interested in playing any of the God of War/Metal Gear Solid/Splinter Cell collections coming out for PS3 and XBox? Those games are going to sell.

The point Nintendo was making was that they aren't blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying "publisher X supports us." They almost always release their systems in the Fall, which means we more than likely have over a year until the release. Do you really think Nintendo and their recently reunited third parties won't hold some of their cards close to the chest until next year's E3, as they have with absolutely every single launch?

Prediction: Flagship Nintendo titles will be announced between here and then, and then delayed into well into 2013. Most of the 3rd party games already announced will be right on time, and we'll see more than a few surprises. Fingers crossed for F-Zero-Wii-X and Starfox-U.
If you dont own an Xbox or a PS3 why buy a Wii-U? It will probably be more expensive and have a lot fewer games. I really dont see the point unless you really like the first party games. Thats a perfectly good reason but c'mon, they are terribly late and I would prefer that they waited and just brought a true next gen console alongside with Microsoft and Sony.
With the right horsepower and third party support, Nintendo will offer many of the same experiences as their competitors and also have plenty of unique games that their competitors don't. They have a history of this. This system has the right horsepower and third party support. If Nintendo stays true to their roots, this system won't cost a great deal more than its competitors are currently selling, and the games will remain about $50 a pop.

Nintendo isn't late. They made a good business decision that was in many ways detrimental or limiting to its hardcore fanbase. No company is going to release 2 separate consoles in the same cycle. Instead, Nintendo is going to continue broadening the overall fanbase of video games (which brings in more developers and more money, which broadens our variety of choices in games), while also focusing more on hardcore titles. They announced over a dozen AAA titles just in the press conference. As I said, my decision is tentative. I don't want to spend $300-400 on a console and a handful of games now and do the same in several months. I'll wait and see what other news comes to light.

We can expect a flood of information to come in by year's end.