Why are you all so surprised at this movie getting a good rating?
Curtmiester said:
I still won't see this movie. I need a substantial plot for me to watch a movie and this just seems like a bucket load of random explosions.
My hats off to you sir. No really, you have my respect. I hate people that go to action movies looking for a god damn plot and come back disappointed (see Fast and Furious 4) You go to see movies like this SPECIFICALLY FOR the explosions, the fight scenes, the car chases. And the fact that you know this movie is for adrenaline junkies and not plot hounds is more than admirable, it's sensible.
This is why I'm not surprised that this movie got a good rating. Critics (good ones) know that when they go to see a movie they SHOULD be in the mindset of the audience the movie is targeting. As Bob said here, 7 year olds, and 20+ year olds who still remember what it was like to be 7 years old IS the target audience. Thats what G.I. Joe was aiming for, and it's NOT like finding a needle in a haystack.
The only way they could've made it better is if they made sure they gave everyone a sugar high before going in to the movie.
It's as if someone like me went to see a movie like oh I don't know, say "the notebook", and I was expecting car chases and explosions and fight scenes and everything that makes life worth living. CLEARLY I would be disappointed and the movie would receive a bad review from me, because I wasn't in the right mindset.
pete240 said:
this guy needs to get a better taste in films ... no way! is this crappy remake of a toy commercial better than james bond!
fixd.
And how can you judge it before you've seen it?