Congratulations?One time in 2007, I went to New York for a day and on multiple occasions ran into protest groups on random street corners comparing Bush to Hitler.
Congratulations?One time in 2007, I went to New York for a day and on multiple occasions ran into protest groups on random street corners comparing Bush to Hitler.
Dennis Kucinich introduced articles of impeachment for Bush.Congratulations?
What was the charge?Dennis Kucinich introduced articles of impeachment for Bush.
I don't know what Kucinich introduced, but I'm actually quite confused by the fact that Bush wasn't impeached for lying to congress following the revelations about the non-existence of W.M.D.'s in Iraq.What was the charge?
Bush also didn't do anything like lead a country to defeating Hitler in a world war.Edit: While I recognize that Stalin probably wasn't as evil as Hitler, there comes a point when the number of unnecessary and innocent deaths just make the nuances white noise. There is only so much blood you can drown in. Bush might be on the lower end of this scale but the amount of blood on his hands would fill the White House
Nancy Pelosi explains, I guess:I don't know what Kucinich introduced, but I'm actually quite confused by the fact that Bush wasn't impeached for lying to congress following the revelations about the non-existence of W.M.D.'s in Iraq.
I don't think Stalin can get much credit for that. It was just one completely insane authoritarian state against another, and any country with the bad fortune to be um....''liberated'' from the Nazi's by Stalin probably wasn't in for a brighter future than before.Bush also didn't do anything like lead a country to defeating Hitler in a world war.
This is a rather scattered thought.I don't think Stalin can get much credit for that. It was just one completely insane authoritarian state against another,
And this is mildly horrifying if meant seriously with an accurate understanding of history.and any country with the bad fortune to be um....''liberated'' from the Nazi's by Stalin probably wasn't in for a brighter future than before.
Is it? Stalin, Hitler...one and the same really. Both dealt with any real or imagined threat the same way. Both are guilty massive purges and genocides.This is a rather scattered thought.
Somehow I don't think eastern Europe agrees. Somehow I suspect they find there to be little difference between Germany or Russia terrorizing them.And this is mildly horrifying if meant seriously with an accurate understanding of history.
YES.Really you prefer this to Trump?
Yes.Is it?
There are sizeable numbers that would prefer a return to the Soviet Union were it possible.Somehow I don't think eastern Europe agrees.
I think you're missing a key differentiator here. With Hitler, the people were crushed under the state's boot for the glory of the Nazi party. With Stalin, the people were crushed under the state's boot for the glory of Communism.Somehow I don't think eastern Europe agrees. Somehow I suspect they find there to be little difference between Germany or Russia terrorizing them.
Yep, destalinisation was pretty successful.There are sizeable numbers that would prefer a return to the Soviet Union were it possible.
???I think the joke was about how people see her as a nasty / bad person and she's a lesbian.....
both sidesing the holocaust is pretty disgustingI think you're missing a key differentiator here. With Hitler, the people were crushed under the state's boot for the glory of the Nazi party. With Stalin, the people were crushed under the state's boot for the glory of Communism.
I'm not at all shocked. Those are all things the modern right strongly desires.Just ignoring the Stalin vs Hitler arguments brewing, I'm complete shocked that the modern right has any warm feelings for the Bush era right to begin with. Dude led the charge with the curtailing of modern rights and freedoms.
PATRIOT, free speech zones enforced by militarized police, travel restrictions, Real ID, TSA security theatre and no fly lists, mass cancellation of people with the wrong political opinion, massive wars based on lies with the resultant war crimes, massive corrupti while privatizing industries, etc
What on earth gave you the idea that they should have a problem with that?Dude led the charge with the curtailing of modern rights and freedoms.
GWB is not much favoured by the current US right as far as I can see, but the reasons for that are the Iraq/Afghanistan occupations turning sour and the financial crash. These were failures, and failures are not to be tolerated. Thus also perhaps a major contributor to the rise of Trump: when traditional Republicanism failed, so a load of them moved to something else.Just ignoring the Stalin vs Hitler arguments brewing, I'm complete shocked that the modern right has any warm feelings for the Bush era right to begin with. Dude led the charge with the curtailing of modern rights and freedoms.
That they distanced themselves from Bush seems more about them needing a scapegoat than actually having a problem with Bush or his policies. Bush seems to be the only Republican who paid a political price for the war on terror. Most other Republicans who supported Bush went on with their careers. Even Trump with his performative distaste for war gave that particular breed of Republicans rank and favor, up to John Bolton.GWB is not much favoured by the current US right as far as I can see, but the reasons for that are the Iraq/Afghanistan occupations turning sour and the financial crash. These were failures, and failures are not to be tolerated. Thus also perhaps a major contributor to the rise of Trump: when traditional Republicanism failed, so a load of them moved to something else.