Dragon Age Origins. Not just because it's my favourite game ever, but because it was ugly when it came out and time has only made it look worse.
Squadron 42 chapter 1 is supposed to be out around the end of this year, you may have your wish. Or at least close enough to it.pookie101 said:the wing commander series
Yep, I'm aware of the XL Engine. I'm more excited about the Unity version, though. It's open source, so fans don't have to worry about the creator pulling the plug on the project for whatever reason.Glongpre said:I remember following this one guy who was creating an engine to allow modern tech for Daggerfall. Found the link: http://xlengine.com/
I think the intention is to allow modders to create Daggerfall with Skyrim level graphics and better, or something, I could be wrong.
It has been slow going though, as you would expect from these kind of fan projects.
Already know all about Black Mesa: Source.Stewie Plisken said:Go to Steam, look up "Black Mesa". Still in Early Access, misses the last chapter (they're working on it) and apparently some bits have been changed, but it's as good as it's going to get.
I suppose certain aspects of each have not aged well. I'll grant that. [footnote]I think Mech 3 and 4, other than a few niggles with UI, controls, etc, actually hold up a lot better than most other games from their respective eras.[/footnote] But when I was talking of remakes for the old games I meant more than just a basic graphical facelift. I also presumed some updating to a few of the other aspects of the games.AccursedTheory said:As much as I'd like a new Mechwarrior game, or for the old ones to get GoG treatment so you can play them without the hassle... I don't think I want remakes of them. All the old Mechwarrior games (And to a less extent MechCommander) are close to my heart, but I also know that all of them have aged pretty poorly, even not considering graphics. Poor AI, poor UI, a multitude of mechanics that need work (And would be sorted out by now if the series hadn't died in 2002), just... it needs a lot of work.
Well...we are getting Battletech [http://www.battletechgame.com/]. So at least it's something.I think I'd prefer new games be made from scratch (Yah, not happening. Thanks PGI and Microsoft), and any effort that was aimed at the older games simply be focused on making them work easier, rather then trying to make them 'better.'
Let's keep this open, shall we. Yes, lots of the games in the past gen have graphics that still are acceptable today and a remake in new consoles, compared to older games, would be near to pointless in the graphics department (and those games and its consoles are still easy to acquire). But others aren't the case (and people usually like to see their favorite games look better, as long as they don't get worse as a whole).infohippie said:canadamus_prime said:Because you'd have to be truly petty to want a graphical update of anything that's less than 10 years old.infohippie said:Why, when so many were made with relatively crappy graphics in the first place so they would fit into the capabilities of a 360? Many such games would benefit greatly from a graphical upgrade.canadamus_prime said:Can we disqualify anything that's less than 10 years old?Honestly, a lot of games from the past ten years have looked pretty shit. A great example is Skyrim, which in fact IS being re-released with updated graphics because the original release looked crap. It's not being released with updated ENOUGH graphics since even the re-release doesn't look as good as mods can make the original look, but it's something. Mass Effect is another, as is Dragon Age Origins. They looked okay for their day, but that day was most of a decade ago. Put next to modern games and they look very rough indeed. So don't sneer just because people would like their games not to be rubbing sandpaper over their eyes.infohippie said:...so many were made with relatively crappy graphics in the first place so they would fit into the capabilities of a 360
Oh, I know we're getting Battletech. I threw an embarrassing amount of money at Battletech.Vigormortis said:Well...we are getting Battletech [http://www.battletechgame.com/]. So at least it's something.I think I'd prefer new games be made from scratch (Yah, not happening. Thanks PGI and Microsoft), and any effort that was aimed at the older games simply be focused on making them work easier, rather then trying to make them 'better.'
A lot of games from the past decade also AREN'T acceptable looking today and were borderline even when they were released. The last generation of consoles went on for years longer than they should have, which in turn hobbled multiplatform titles. That's why I say vanilla Skyrim looked pretty poor when it was released, it had to fit within the limitations of consoles that were already long past their use by date. Fortunately modders fixed that on PC, but that's how it should have looked from the start.CaitSeith said:Let's keep this open, shall we. Yes, lots of the games in the past gen have graphics that still are acceptable today and a remake in new consoles, compared to older games, would be near to pointless in the graphics department (and those games and its consoles are still easy to acquire). But others aren't the case (and people usually like to see their favorite games look better, as long as they don't get worse as a whole).infohippie said:canadamus_prime said:Because you'd have to be truly petty to want a graphical update of anything that's less than 10 years old.infohippie said:Why, when so many were made with relatively crappy graphics in the first place so they would fit into the capabilities of a 360? Many such games would benefit greatly from a graphical upgrade.canadamus_prime said:Can we disqualify anything that's less than 10 years old?Honestly, a lot of games from the past ten years have looked pretty shit. A great example is Skyrim, which in fact IS being re-released with updated graphics because the original release looked crap. It's not being released with updated ENOUGH graphics since even the re-release doesn't look as good as mods can make the original look, but it's something. Mass Effect is another, as is Dragon Age Origins. They looked okay for their day, but that day was most of a decade ago. Put next to modern games and they look very rough indeed. So don't sneer just because people would like their games not to be rubbing sandpaper over their eyes.infohippie said:...so many were made with relatively crappy graphics in the first place so they would fit into the capabilities of a 360
PS: Skyrim, looking like shit? LOL. I never get tired of that hyperbole.
Battletech? *sigh* That's okay I guess, but damnit, when are we going to get a new Mechwarrior game? I've been waiting for that since MW4. And no, MWO does not count since it's PvP arena shit without a storyline and single player campaign.AccursedTheory said:Oh, I know we're getting Battletech. I threw an embarrassing amount of money at Battletech.Vigormortis said:Well...we are getting Battletech [http://www.battletechgame.com/]. So at least it's something.I think I'd prefer new games be made from scratch (Yah, not happening. Thanks PGI and Microsoft), and any effort that was aimed at the older games simply be focused on making them work easier, rather then trying to make them 'better.'
New Mechwarrior? Never. Microsoft has given PGI an exclusive video game deal. And while PGI is more then willing to give HBS a piece of the pie, they'll never let go of the Mechwarrior series 'proper.' A new Mechwarrior game will almost certainly have to come with a Mulitplayer component, which would kill the money train that is MW:O. Not including a multiplayer component in a new single player game would lead to mass revolt, poisoning the MW:O well forever.infohippie said:AccursedTheory said:Oh, I know we're getting Battletech. I threw an embarrassing amount of money at Battletech.Vigormortis said:Well...we are getting Battletech [http://www.battletechgame.com/]. So at least it's something.I think I'd prefer new games be made from scratch (Yah, not happening. Thanks PGI and Microsoft), and any effort that was aimed at the older games simply be focused on making them work easier, rather then trying to make them 'better.'
Battletech? *sigh* That's okay I guess, but damnit, when are we going to get a new Mechwarrior game? I've been waiting for that since MW4. And no, MWO does not count since it's PvP arena shit without a storyline and single player campaign.
Scarim Coral said:Maybe KOTOR 1 and 2 only to get my stupid brother to give that danm game a go (he was put of from the graphic, like wth? It's fine but in saying so he only bought FF13 for the graphic alone).
don't know if either of you saw this, but a while back this dev/group of people are "remaking" kotorAccursedTheory said:The KOTORs deserve, at the very least, a resolution bump, if not a flat out full overhaul.
Then... hmmm... let me dig through my Steam catalog...
Shit, I'm drawing a blank at the moment.
Well, I am hoping like mad that MWO DOES die, because it's a steaming pile of shit. I guess I'll have to redouble my black chicken sacrifices at midnight and add a goat or two.AccursedTheory said:New Mechwarrior? Never. Microsoft has given PGI an exclusive video game deal. And while PGI is more then willing to give HBS a piece of the pie, they'll never let go of the Mechwarrior series 'proper.' A new Mechwarrior game will almost certainly have to come with a Mulitplayer component, which would kill the money train that is MW:O. Not including a multiplayer component in a new single player game would lead to mass revolt, poisoning the MW:O well forever.infohippie said:AccursedTheory said:Oh, I know we're getting Battletech. I threw an embarrassing amount of money at Battletech.Vigormortis said:Well...we are getting Battletech [http://www.battletechgame.com/]. So at least it's something.I think I'd prefer new games be made from scratch (Yah, not happening. Thanks PGI and Microsoft), and any effort that was aimed at the older games simply be focused on making them work easier, rather then trying to make them 'better.'
Battletech? *sigh* That's okay I guess, but damnit, when are we going to get a new Mechwarrior game? I've been waiting for that since MW4. And no, MWO does not count since it's PvP arena shit without a storyline and single player campaign.
So, they'll never let it happen. They'll talk about it every one in a while, but it's just talk. Single player Mechwarrior is dead, unless MW:O dies. Then we just have to wait another decade and pray.
Also, correction - MW:O actually does have a storyline. It's the standard one, only players are allowed to influence it, so they have to wipe it periodically because, surprise surprise, Tukayyid turns into a shit show when you let players and factions loose.