Gearbox-Made Duke Nukem Forever Confirmed at PAX

AboveUp

New member
May 21, 2008
1,382
0
0
I'm happy. This will be at least one shooter that isn't completely dead serious about itself. I completely welcome the immaturity that the Duke is sure to bring back to the industry.
 

rileyrulesu

New member
Jun 15, 2009
247
0
0
BlueHighwind said:
Am I the only one who is seriously unhappy with this news?

"Duke Nukem Forever" isn't just a game anymore - its a legend. This thing has transcended its intended medium and become a living metaphor for all pathetic overally-long development times and just plain old failure. Its a digital Spruce Goose. We love the Spruce Goose not because of its success, but because of what a massive ridiculous waste of money it was. You can't take that away from us! "Duke Nukem Forever" can only live on if its never completed. When the actual game comes out as a boring shooter game, nobody will care anymore. The legend will be murdered with bare-faced fact. We don't want fact. We don't want tangibility. The "Duke Nukem Forever" that lives so fondly in our hearts is the one that can never be completed - the eternal punchline.

So please, I ask you, DON'T finish the game.

EXACTLY, we NEED it not to be finished! Not just for the joke, but for gaming itself! Duke Nukem 3D was a legend. The sequel's not coming out is what people think of when you hear the word "duke", even if that's your dog's name. Duke Nukem Forever is not a game, it should never be a game. it is a fable. It is an embodiment of hype and desire. Duke Nukem Forever has a legacy. I truly hope this is all a joke, and it will be delayed just to continue this legacy.
 

AboveUp

New member
May 21, 2008
1,382
0
0
SquirrelPants said:
DiscoAtThePanic said:
Played previous Duke Nukem Games? As in, the only other Duke Nukem Game? How many decades ago?
There are four or five of them. Duke Nukem and Duke Nukem 2 were side-scrolling platformers, and Duke Nukem 3D is the best-known one. Then there was a GBA Duke game, and Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project. That's all I know of, but 3D is definitely not the only one.
You forgot the PS1 titles: Time to Kill and Land of the Babes. Next to that the N64 still had Zero Hour. A lot of people forget Duke was a proper franchise back in the day.
 

wastaz

Mmm...brains...
Nov 16, 2009
40
0
0
What?
No wait what?
Seriously?
You're kidding?
What?

.....IT'S THE APOCALYPSE! O_O
 

SteakHeart

New member
Jul 20, 2009
15,098
0
0
rileyrulesu said:
BlueHighwind said:
Am I the only one who is seriously unhappy with this news?

"Duke Nukem Forever" isn't just a game anymore - its a legend. This thing has transcended its intended medium and become a living metaphor for all pathetic overally-long development times and just plain old failure. Its a digital Spruce Goose. We love the Spruce Goose not because of its success, but because of what a massive ridiculous waste of money it was. You can't take that away from us! "Duke Nukem Forever" can only live on if its never completed. When the actual game comes out as a boring shooter game, nobody will care anymore. The legend will be murdered with bare-faced fact. We don't want fact. We don't want tangibility. The "Duke Nukem Forever" that lives so fondly in our hearts is the one that can never be completed - the eternal punchline.

So please, I ask you, DON'T finish the game.

EXACTLY, we NEED it not to be finished! Not just for the joke, but for gaming itself! Duke Nukem 3D was a legend. The sequel's not coming out is what people think of when you hear the word "duke", even if that's your dog's name. Duke Nukem Forever is not a game, it should never be a game. it is a fable. It is an embodiment of hype and desire. Duke Nukem Forever has a legacy. I truly hope this is all a joke, and it will be delayed just to continue this legacy.
Ah, but if they finish it, then it could be a metaphor for things that take a while, but end up awesome (or bad, if that's the outcome)?

...No wait, we have TF2 for that.
 

DiscoAtThePanic

New member
Sep 3, 2010
75
0
0
VanityGirl said:
In all honesty, do you really think it's going to be a smash hit at this point? The game's been on and off and we know NOTHNG about the game (beside the fact that its finally finished). I don't want to be Debbie Downer, but my hopes for the quality of the game are lacking. Have we seen a REAL screenshot of the game?

*sigh*

It's exciting that it is finally finished, but until I see a real screen shot, this game doesn't exist.
I will be Debbie Downer. Gearbox spent less that a year on it. Much of it was leftovers made by 3D Realms, according to Gearbox. Why would we assume what they had made, scrapped and remade who knows how many times over a decade was good, and how much did Gearbox have to contrive to string it all together? What game that was ever started by one group and finished by a completely seperate group was ever considered great?
 

DiscoAtThePanic

New member
Sep 3, 2010
75
0
0
SteakHeart said:
rileyrulesu said:
BlueHighwind said:
Am I the only one who is seriously unhappy with this news?

"Duke Nukem Forever" isn't just a game anymore - its a legend. This thing has transcended its intended medium and become a living metaphor for all pathetic overally-long development times and just plain old failure. Its a digital Spruce Goose. We love the Spruce Goose not because of its success, but because of what a massive ridiculous waste of money it was. You can't take that away from us! "Duke Nukem Forever" can only live on if its never completed. When the actual game comes out as a boring shooter game, nobody will care anymore. The legend will be murdered with bare-faced fact. We don't want fact. We don't want tangibility. The "Duke Nukem Forever" that lives so fondly in our hearts is the one that can never be completed - the eternal punchline.

So please, I ask you, DON'T finish the game.

EXACTLY, we NEED it not to be finished! Not just for the joke, but for gaming itself! Duke Nukem 3D was a legend. The sequel's not coming out is what people think of when you hear the word "duke", even if that's your dog's name. Duke Nukem Forever is not a game, it should never be a game. it is a fable. It is an embodiment of hype and desire. Duke Nukem Forever has a legacy. I truly hope this is all a joke, and it will be delayed just to continue this legacy.
Ah, but if they finish it, then it could be a metaphor for things that take a while, but end up awesome (or bad, if that's the outcome)?

...No wait, we have TF2 for that.
It could serve the same purpose, the warning for future generations, y coming out as the most dissapointing game ever, surpassing Daikatana. It's all about expextations being raised to the point that a great game could not meet them and a bad game seemes even worse as a result. Just like Attack of the Clones.
 

Infinatex

BLAM!Headshot?!
May 19, 2009
1,890
0
0
How to make a top selling game:

1. Announce a sequel to a popular tranches From the 90s.
2. Do absolutely nothing but say that you are making it for a good few years.
3. When everyone thinks that it is never coming out, quickly throw it together and release it ASAP!
4. Guaranteed SMASH HIT!

EDIT:
5. Get a ZP review of you fictional game to be voted a the best review on the week you announce your release.
 

bojac6

New member
Oct 15, 2009
489
0
0
This is going to be a huge hit. Seriously, look at this from a marketing perspective. This game can be terrible. You don't need content beyond a barebones game. You've got complete advertising saturation. Everybody knows about this game. Every gamer has heard of it, most non-gamers will be aware of it. Companies have gone belly up, it's been anticipated for 12 years. This is the kind of market opportunity companies with good games can only dream about.

Except Blizzard, they do the same thing. They just happen to be making money while they're not making games.
 

HK_01

New member
Jun 1, 2009
1,610
0
0
Somehow I'm sad about this. I've come to really like this running gag called Duke Nukem Forever. When it's actually released the myth will die.
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
Nintendolover222 said:
Assassin Xaero said:
If this actually does comes out, then is Half-Life 2 Episode 3 going to be the next Duke Nukem Forever?
http://www.halflife2.net/2010/09/01/valve-have-3-big-surprises/
...And? Their last "big surprise" that everyone said was going to be Ep3 was that Portal 2 would be on PS3 or something like that...
 

sgtshock

New member
Feb 11, 2009
1,103
0
0
To all the people saying "lol, this has taken forever and i bet this is going to suxxors", don't forget how long Team Fortress 2 was in development. And they may not be Valve, but Gearbox is a pretty decent developer.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
I will buy this game only for the novelty. You can't claim to be a gamer without owning DNF on release day. I do believe that it will be released, that it will suck, and that it will sell millions. I'm looking forward to Yahtzee's review of the real game :p
 

CosmicCommander

Friendly Neighborhood Troll?
Apr 11, 2009
1,544
0
0
Do you realise, when they release DNF, it'll have been twenty years since the first game in the series was released?

Damn...