I think I need to clarify my position. I do no support a complete ban on firearms. In the right hands, a gun not only provides the means for sport, but also the means for security. However, I do believe in certain restrictions. Certain firearms and related technology should not be made available to the public, and moreover, certain people should not be permitted to possess firearms period. For example, I do not think the public should be allowed to purchase extended magazines. Furthermore, I think that background checks should register more than just felonies. With such measures in place, I think the rate of homicide resulting from firearms would be reduced without depriving honest people of sport and security.Fidelias said:Okay, I understand. And I thank you for putting your points across so politely.
However, I just want to point out my opinion.
1.No matter what country you name, it has crime.
2.A criminal could very easily break into my house.
3.I would not be able to defend myself without a gun.
So here's my point. I don't CARE that the US has an extremely high crime rate. I care that there's a chance that I might one day have someone break into my house to kill me or my family. I care about the fact that if I didn't have a gun, I would not be able to defend myself, and me, and my family, would be dead.