I see three guys with their junk bare. No I am not.CrossLOPER said:Please tell me you are joking.erttheking said:Might want to put a NSFW tag on that one.CrossLOPER said:Art has not changed a bit over the millennia.
You at work in the Vatican or something?erttheking said:I see three guys with their junk bare. No I am not.CrossLOPER said:Please tell me you are joking.erttheking said:Might want to put a NSFW tag on that one.CrossLOPER said:Art has not changed a bit over the millennia.
I'm just saying someone at work might not look that good if their boss comes in and sees them looking at that.1337mokro said:You at work in the Vatican or something?erttheking said:I see three guys with their junk bare. No I am not.CrossLOPER said:Please tell me you are joking.erttheking said:Might want to put a NSFW tag on that one.CrossLOPER said:Art has not changed a bit over the millennia.
Just say you are appreciating FINE ART, because that's what it is if it's made by a dead guy. If it's made by a living person it's horribly sexist and wrong
Or it could go like this:erttheking said:I'm just saying someone at work might not look that good if their boss comes in and sees them looking at that.1337mokro said:You at work in the Vatican or something?erttheking said:I see three guys with their junk bare. No I am not.CrossLOPER said:Please tell me you are joking.erttheking said:Might want to put a NSFW tag on that one.CrossLOPER said:Art has not changed a bit over the millennia.
Just say you are appreciating FINE ART, because that's what it is if it's made by a dead guy. If it's made by a living person it's horribly sexist and wrong
What if I'm turned on by intelligence and the reason huge boobs are a turnoff is because it's a shallow attempt to pander to me, which I take as insulting?Johnny Impact said:Yes and no. Breasts that size are a turnoff, but objecting for reasons of turnoff implies you think female characters should all turn you on, and any design that doesn't is wrong. Careful....RJ Dalton said:Is my primary objective to this representation allowed to be that huge breasts are just a turnoff to me?
This argument is one of the reasons that feminism doesn't understanding gaming and fantasy. Supporting equal rights, dignity, and opportunity for all people does not mean you have to stop enjoying your fantasies. Feminism needs to figure out how to become more realistic and let people like things. Deriding what people like as childish and shaming people for not being "progressive" makes feminism looks like it's becoming a morality movement that's going to start handing out scarlet letters.snowfi6916 said:Bob, I like you a lot, and I always watch all your videos, but you are wrong here.
You claim that you are a feminist who supports everything that feminism stands for. Yet, in your next breath, you claim that you find absolutely nothing wrong with the Sorceress (or any of the other female characters that are portrayed in this game), saying that you find her "pretty".
Sorry Bob, but what the Sorceress is, and the other female characters in this game are, is objectification of women. There is no other word for it. It is painting unrealistic views about what women should be. NO WOMAN looks like this, and it is wrong for us to think that this is what they should be.
If you truly claim to be a feminist, you would be shouting from the rooftops that this needs to change, not saying "oh but I'm a pig and I like this."
I'll start. How about having female characters with realistic fucking breast sizes? Is that so much to ask? Why do they need to be so huge that they look like they are their own body, and move independent of the rest of the character?
Riot Games changed Sejuani because they realized no warrior would be dressed the way she was in the middle of winter. Her original character design had her basically wearing a bikini in a freaking snow storm. Now, she actually looks like a warrior. Yes, she is still a beautiful woman to look at, but she is not just eye candy anymore.
THAT is what we need. You can have beautiful female characters without making them into sex objects or eye candy.
Then I think you'll like Faye Reagan, just a hunch.PunkRex said:This is why I love you Bob, agreements all round. I was raised by my mum, little sister and nan but gawd damn if I just don't like me a busty red head.
If you want to be able to enjoy playing games with normal people, it does. If you enjoy character design that isn't absolute shit, it also does.Father Time said:It doesn't NEED to change, you just want it to.
Not really. I think Bob is precisely pointing out that this shouldn't be perceived as a "war" and that people should be more considerate of others and strive for a calm discourse about these issues.JoshuaMadoc said:Moreso when even MovieBob says there's "no easy answer". That pretty much amounts to "This is a war where no one will ever win, everyone's just going to lose."
Except it's clear that there's more people who don't realize or refuse to realize that it's not a war (of copout statements), and a lot of the times, they still kill each other just so they can feel better about themselves when they've managed to be on top of their opponents. I'm tired of the smell of entrails coming out of them with each bloody debate.Uhura said:Not really. I think Bob is precisely pointing out that this shouldn't be perceived as a "war" and that people should be more considerate of others and strive for a calm discourse about these issues.JoshuaMadoc said:Moreso when even MovieBob says there's "no easy answer". That pretty much amounts to "This is a war where no one will ever win, everyone's just going to lose."
It depends on what websites you read. Rockpapershotgun.com certainly complained about Kerrigan.castlewise said:It is unclear to me why Dragon's Crown gets to be star of the show in this latest round of internet drama but a game like Starcraft 2, for instance, gets a free pass on their character design. Why is the Sorceress over the line but Kerrigan with her impractical zerg heels and meticulous non-chitin covered ass is somehow ok?