Jimquisition: Gamer Guys

Matthew Abbott

New member
Jan 13, 2013
18
0
0
I always failed to see the point of elitism in hobbies or media preferences. Sure, I jokingly sometimes play the elitist, but I've never understood those who literally feel assaulted by the fact that some people do not fit their idea of what a (in this case, but it applies to many passtimes) gamer should be. Why someone should give a tin shit about that while simultaneously tolerating sexist, homophobic, and racist people is beyond me. If someone wants to call themselves a gamer because they play Farmville, let them. If someone wants to cosplay as a character because they like how they look, not because a particular affinity for the character or the media they come from, how does that harm you? I consider myself a football fan, but I don't know most of the players, I don't know how each team measure up, and I don't know the stats for each team. I only pay attention to the teams and players I like, and that fact means that someone could call me a "fake football fan" despite the fact I enjoy the game. There are no qualifications to be a gamer. Deal with it. Fake gamers are much less concerning than all the crap that actually does affect the community.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Lightknight said:
Well, our culture hasn't exactly been known for social aptness, particularly around women. We do have extremely anti-social or just plain awkward members in our ranks.
Well, a couple problems there:

1. This isn't the same culture anymore. Whether or not you (or anyone else) likes it, video games have developed into a much larger community.
Ok? I'm not sure how this relates to my comments that nerd culture includes a non-trivial number of socially inept individuals. The expansion of ranks only serves to dilute the proportions, not remove them.

2. This is at the same time we're seeking legitimacy from the mainstream. And since you think women should expect gamers to behave like hostile basement-dwelling manchildren, I expect you agree that gamers should at the same time expect to be treated as hostile, basement-dwelling manchildren. I mean, it's only reasonable, right? I hope you've never been one of those folks to act like we should have legitimacy.
? I did not say that. I was merely explaining why several odd interactions would happen, not that everything that happened was somehow ok and to be accepted. Don't read into social commentary as justification.

Numbered again for my sanity:

1. You just spent two paragraphs excusing, explaining and justifying a behaviour you don't believe is actually prevalent?
Seeing as you mistook my meaning to be a justification of sexual harrassment then I'm going to assume my clarification on my intention of the social commentary to annul the reasoning behind this point.

2. Examples have been given frequently, including this thread. I'm always wary of people who ask for evidence after evidence has been given. Perhaps you really did just saunter into the thread, but it seems suspect. Especially when you're already making excuses for the behaviour.
So no, you don't have evidence of events in which people have behaved innappropriately or said ridiculous stuff but no information regarding the prevalence of the mindset. I agree that anywhere it happens is a problem and, frankly, stupid. But I'm trying to figure out if this is a broad problem with a mainstream mindset or if we're looking at smaller cases and ballooning them. That's an important question to ask and asking it shouldn't make me out to be some kind of anti-woman person, it just makes me inquisitive. Does that make better sense?

I'd also attest that the continuation of this thread largely hinges on such a mentality. I'm not sure what else people are protesting. Well, most people. Some people seem to be trying to skirt it.
I'm not sure what this point is supposed to be. Are you saying that the continued discussion in this thread is ipso facto evidence of a larger trend against women in gaming? I see some discussion on people being frustrated about individuals being 'fakers' rather than individuals who are genuinely interested in our culture. While I think that's nonsense I wouldn't necessarily equate that to them hating all women entries. But to take it a step further and to actually start quizing people on their nerd knowledge is nonsense. Especially when one of the things that make us nerds is devotion to specific sub categories. Also, you've got to start somewhere. Some people are going to be new nerds. To believe them not knowing information that you know is just silly. It's like a person finding that they love sushi and then someone claims they don't because they've never had a particular kind of sushi.
 

The Lyre

New member
Jul 2, 2008
791
0
0
It's not really satire when the supposedly 'absurd' occurrences are pretty commonplace.

Geek-chic is still a thing - a ridiculous thing, where men now try to dress as some bizarre idealised version of the same tiny bespectacled kid we all laughed at and even bullied for no reason in school. I feel bad that we locked Joel in a closet, but apparently my old classmates now want to dress like him.

Youtube personalities do base their video-game related channels entirely on their own looks/loud online persona - and, in rare cases, charisma - rather than their actual knowledge of the industry. Sorry to be 'elitist', but I'd still rather watch Sterling than PewDiePie, even if I disagree with Sterling half of the time.

I don't know if I'd play Tomb Raider if it was Nathan Drake in a man-thong, but I wouldn't begrudge the fact that it was supposedly meant to 'appeal' to women. That's what, well, Boys Love manga and VNs are for. Apparently. I wouldn't know.

Of course, I don't have the right to tell people what they should or shouldn't watch, but when Sterling brings up the supposedly 'absurd alternate reality' of men using their looks to gain fame, wealth and popularity, I sort of wonder what planet he's living on where, apparently, male models don't exist. And, again, sorry to be elitist, but if I want information or news on my particular hobby, I'm going to trust someone who seems to have extensive knowledge in that subject rather than a model. It has nothing to do with them as people - I don't know them - and everything to do with their careers. One is modelling, the other is...what exactly is Sterling's job?

And as for obnoxious 'guy gamers' on Xbox Live...uh...can I have access to the VIP servers Sterling uses? Apparently he doesn't have to deal with the same riff-raff as I do.

I realise that I'm just being pedantic, and that this video is aimed at people who get bizarrely outraged at the idea of attractive people being successful for being attractive etc. but this whole video just goes straight over my head because everything he mentions actually exists.
 

TrulyBritish

New member
Jan 23, 2013
473
0
0
WaitWHAT said:
Y'know what? Imagine if there were such things as fake gamer girls and everyone integrated them into the community anyway! That way, the 'real' geeks would be accepted without protest, and the 'fake' ones would be forced to suffer an eternity of desperately pretending to enjoy something they don't.



EDIT:
Monxeroth said:


B-b-baka Jim!
I-it's not like i..i enjoyed the..episode or anything...stupid!
This does strange things to my undercarriage. But....please continue.
Oh WaitWHAT, you're such a naughty feller ;)

As for the video, yeah really amusing. I remain on the fence as to the existence of these "fake gamer girls" but certainly, I don't think we should be scrutinising everyone to see if they're allowed into our specialised club. What are we? The ever so Glorious PC Gaming Master Race? :p
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Funny thing to me is that it is not any where nearly as "satirical" as it is supposed to be. I can see rationalization for loathing toward the dudebro "hardcore" FPS/WoW gamer archetype that created this massive influx and social acceptance towards gaming and brought with it a far worse result.

But OT, I find it somewhat messed up that for someone who has preached that "we cant even discuss the topic of equality in gaming without someone getting hostile and offended" to constantly harp and essentially demand acceptance of their personal position as the only possible correct one. Its like most of those amongst the faux enlightenment crowd. You have to wonder who they are trying to convince.. you or themselves

Edit: if you DO decide to go back to the sarcasta-verse, perhaps you should do it right complete with the prerequisite black goatee.



Imma just saiyan
 

Gindil

New member
Nov 28, 2009
1,621
0
0
Rebel_Raven said:
Funny, you say no one's against it, but here you are saying you're against it since it makes no sense in game, and she'd become mary sue, and she'd be uninteresting. That's very much against Zelda having a more heroic role as the protagonist.
And lets not forget the comments section on that article, here.

Shiek? Tetra? Both combat capable Zeldas in the mythos of the game. Zelda helped fight now and then actively as herself, especially in fights vs Gannon.

How does it make sense that she's as powerful as all that, yet gets kidnapped in nearly every game? How wise is it to leave yourself vulnerable to being kidnapped in the first place, or not have people won over so you have a legion of people who volunteeer to, or insist on defending you? It's a bit of a long standing peeve of mine with "intelligent" people in games, tv, and movies. They seem to know everything but how to defend themselves.

Why ya gotta keep Zelda in the role of getting kidnapped? Are you saying it's impossible for Zelda to be the hero?

If she were well written as the hero of her own legend, she could pull it off without being mary sue.

A gender select Link would be ok, I guess, but I think Zelda as a hero would be more pallatable for me.
Uhm... No?

Maybe I see a character for something besides the one time they're captured, particularly when I see Zelda as this strong progressive woman that's a nuclear threat who has so much power as to create the Master Sword and give it to her Hylian Hero that the gender doesn't matter to me. Maybe instead of just whining "Oh she's captured, she's now useless" you could see that she never gives up on her realm and even as a princess with constraints, she finds ways to help you, the player, in completing the quest.

And she's fought in four games IIRC, while people also ignore how Midna helped out Link so much that it was basically her game far more than the listless Link. Then people forget that she was playable in the CD-i games and those sucked.

All you seem intent on doing is saying "Damsel = useless" based on what... A video from a media critic who just barely got into the game industry but markets herself as a gamer?

Honestly, what makes Zelda being playable so much different than having an option of a female Link? It's the same difference without changing the core mythos.
 

Rebel_Raven

New member
Jul 24, 2011
1,606
0
0
Gindil said:
Rebel_Raven said:
Funny, you say no one's against it, but here you are saying you're against it since it makes no sense in game, and she'd become mary sue, and she'd be uninteresting. That's very much against Zelda having a more heroic role as the protagonist.
And lets not forget the comments section on that article, here.

Shiek? Tetra? Both combat capable Zeldas in the mythos of the game. Zelda helped fight now and then actively as herself, especially in fights vs Gannon.

How does it make sense that she's as powerful as all that, yet gets kidnapped in nearly every game? How wise is it to leave yourself vulnerable to being kidnapped in the first place, or not have people won over so you have a legion of people who volunteeer to, or insist on defending you? It's a bit of a long standing peeve of mine with "intelligent" people in games, tv, and movies. They seem to know everything but how to defend themselves.

Why ya gotta keep Zelda in the role of getting kidnapped? Are you saying it's impossible for Zelda to be the hero?

If she were well written as the hero of her own legend, she could pull it off without being mary sue.

A gender select Link would be ok, I guess, but I think Zelda as a hero would be more pallatable for me.
Uhm... No?

Maybe I see a character for something besides the one time they're captured, particularly when I see Zelda as this strong progressive woman that's a nuclear threat who has so much power as to create the Master Sword and give it to her Hylian Hero that the gender doesn't matter to me. Maybe instead of just whining "Oh she's captured, she's now useless" you could see that she never gives up on her realm and even as a princess with constraints, she finds ways to help you, the player, in completing the quest.

And she's fought in four games IIRC, while people also ignore how Midna helped out Link so much that it was basically her game far more than the listless Link. Then people forget that she was playable in the CD-i games and those sucked.

All you seem intent on doing is saying "Damsel = useless" based on what... A video from a media critic who just barely got into the game industry but markets herself as a gamer?

Honestly, what makes Zelda being playable so much different than having an option of a female Link? It's the same difference without changing the core mythos.
Uhm, yes? You said no one is against the idea of Zelda having her own game, and yet here you are, being against it?

Really? we're involving "her?" This is why we can't have civil conversations, and I'm being dead serious. It's rediculous!

No, my opinions aren't based on she who shalt not be named lest the entire conversation derail into personal attacks on her.
Is it impossible to people that others might have reached a similar conclusion without her input? Yes, I've seen her videos, and they didn't really change a damn thing for me save enlighten me on Dinosaur Planet's fate as an example of something I bloody well hate in the game industry.

Off camera rulership doesn't count for me, nevermind off camera actions period.
Even if it -did- count, the idyllic worlds of peace with little to no military prepared to do anything more than one guy with a wooden sword, even with a chunk of triforce, can do is really -bad- leadership to me. I don't care how long peace has gone on, if a kingdom lacks a decent army, it's a failure. It doesn't have to be personally led by the ruler, there can be delegation to someone who can make an army worth a damn.
If the princess were really so beloved, there'd be an army of volunteers trying to rescue her at the least, and not just one guy. There'd be people training to be her bodyguard to keep her safe beyond, ya kknow, her one hero. Where's the fanatics trying to save her along with Link?
Why has the kingdom seemingly given up on Zelda when she gets captured? Why is there no more than one champion? Is she really thought of that poorly that no one, by hire, by volunteer, or by any reason, doesn't want to be there to defend her, and get better in preparation of it?
But I guess that's the curse, isn't it?

Lets not forget that the instant she drops disguise, she's captured. Regardless of anything she's done before. Regardless of all her power you boast she has. She's utterly helpless in the face of being captured, and generally does nothing until the end. It's irritating. I've always found it irritating when things like that happen. Me, personally, with no input from others.
I don't believe in power I don't see in action, or better yet, control via a playable character. Actions speak louder than words. Being playable speaks louder than being an NPC. Seeing that the evbents don't back up the boasts makes those boasts ring false with me.

It's ALWAYS been a peeve of mine that the wisest, most intelligent of people in media like TV shows, movies, and games are still dumb enough to not be able to defend themselves, either personally, or by having others at the ready, or what have you.
This is compounded by the fact that if they know they're a frikking target (I.E. being important to the society in any way), and it's compounded moreover when they continually ignore the threat over and over again!

Heck, considering it's Link who saves Zelda time, and time again, it seems more reasonable that -he's- the real threat that needs to be kidnapped, and rendered helpless. Seriously, one guy curbstomps an army, plus the puzzles, and he's left alone consistently to fight in his own element to come out on top time and time again? That's pretty dumb villainy there. It's not like the person kidnapped over and over again is going to be able to resist being captured anyhow, right? Go for that target second.
But I guess that's the curse isn't it?

Being temporary help isn't particularly awesome to me. An NPC is an NPC to me. No NPC can rival a player character for me. All it can do is make me wish I could be that NPC.
NPCs dont get the spotlight, they're shunted off into the background, or off stage completely while the playabale character gets things done. Playable characters do get the spotlight since nothing gets done to solve the problems without the playable characters.

There's prolly a plethora of reasons people forgot about the CD-I games.

So, why Zelda instead of gender swaps? What does it do for -Zelda- here if we just gender swap? Male, female, Zelda's role is the same, time, and time again with little variation.

Even gender swapped, Link is Link. Link will likely play the exact same regardless of gender. Possibly more annoying is that gender won't likely play any real role in the story. It'll likely just be link as a girl, not really being treated diffirently than typical link. Sure that's something akin to equality, but what's the point of a gender swap if it's so shallow to the point that nothing else has changed?

I'd like a female protagonist in a Zelda game to be a somewhat meaningful change, here, gender issues aside. Wouldn't you?
 

Impluse_101

New member
Jun 25, 2009
1,415
0
0
...I'm suddenly remided of Shamus's videos...where he goes...crazy for the purpose of entertainment and laughter.

Regardless.

LOBSTERCLAWS! :D~
...

LOBSTERCLAWS!
 

Xakk Zeliff

New member
Mar 21, 2012
9
0
0
Fake gamers (which are not just girls, that's just the easy target) really have nothing to do with gaming itself really. It only affects the gamers themselves. They don't play games with anything like the kind of veracity that would incite the industry Jim loves to lambast to cater to their tastes (whatever the heck those are).
It's more the sense of camaraderie, of comradeship with gamers they seek. Nowadays those groups are seen not as the ostracized social leftovers, but a strong social demo in and of itself. We're catered to in other industries with some of the choicest and well-assembled ways by gamers in other industries, because people whose hobby is partaking of media know how to shape a product to appeal to the senses. A lot of people want that kind of love, but they don't understand how to get it.
The problem is that this kin of attention was never addressed to people who get with it for it's own sake. You can't be part of the gamer crowd just by playing games and buying the t-shirts; Contrary to a lot of arguments, supporting the industry is not what it's about. There were gamers before games were an industrial force, and just buying the NES Pad belt buckle and wearing proudly does not mean that it's a symbol that represents you any more than doing so with sergeant stripes does.
Playing games doesn't qualify you either, not anymore. It's a new era with a class of games targeted for the everyman, and everyman that plays them is not the gamer the belt buckle was meant for.
You have to adjust your attitude. You have to get into the details of the game instead of 'god, just enjoy it'-ing. You gotta try games that might suck, or have been said to suck, or are not similar to the games you usually play. You have to know something about aspects in the games you do play that isn't presented in the games you do play. Notice none of this requires arbitrary obscure knowledge, just a little more effort than buying a bastaging mario cap. I have no problem with people who want to be gamers now that it's popular, but you do have to earn your stripes.
(the people who make bastaging mario caps have no problem with taking 'fake' gamers' money either, but don't think for a second they'd call you the real deal just based on that.)
 

Insanely Asinine

New member
Sep 7, 2010
73
0
0
Monxeroth said:
WaitWHAT said:
"Guys leading me on with their muscular buns and slick calf muscles."
"using their supple, smooth bodies and elegant nipples to sell themselves on sex appeal"


Jim....it's time for you to come out of there.



(<3)

OT: Well, I didn't think that this was such a problem. I'd've thought that everyone could get on nicely, liking the things they like and peacefully letting others do the same. But if Jim's having to do a video on it, I may well have been wrong.
Even i wouldnt fit in there...
I probably could. Then again I'm tiny as fuck. Great when you don't want to be notice also all the spaces you could fit in. It is wonderful especially when you want to frighten anyone. Anyway all this talk about sex is boring.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
Jimothy Sterling said:
Jimquisition travels to another time and another place, examining a world taken over by gamer guys and their testosterone-addled inanity. Something must be done!
Excellent video Jim! As always, I thank the gods for you. ^^

Aside from that, I just wanted to say that I got a real kick out of seeing several things I've said in the past visualized in this episode. This episode is particularly awesome. Well done.
 

JellySlimerMan

New member
Dec 28, 2012
211
0
0
So apparently Jim doesn't know about Female Hypoagency cause he doesn't read too much.

Lets GirlWritesWhat handle this, cause i will assume that no one will hear me cause i am supposedly a "male gamer in its basement" and therefore biased for no apparent buttfucking reason, so i will let her explain for you kiddies:
 

Spud of Doom

New member
Feb 24, 2011
349
0
0
That little clip at the end of the rant with the prawn on a white background and piano music was hilarious.
 

Rebel_Raven

New member
Jul 24, 2011
1,606
0
0
JellySlimerMan said:
So apparently Jim doesn't know about Female Hypoagency cause he doesn't read too much.

Lets GirlWritesWhat handle this, cause i will assume that no one will hear me cause i am supposedly a "male gamer in its basement" and therefore biased for no apparent buttfucking reason, so i will let her explain for you kiddies:
One of her less wooden presentations, IMO. Still pretty stiff, though. It's hard to sit through her videos most times, and I commend people that do regularly.

The vid barely touches on videogames, and videogame culture which this thread is about.

The largest point seems to be that women want to be included for a safety/control factor, and it may be true for some women, but lets not pretend all of them are like that. I can't deny it happens just because that's the way it is because that's the way -humans- are wired.
We all want inclusion when all is said and done. When there's a group having fun, and we're not having as much fun, we want in. Guys, and gals will both play the poser to try and get in.
That isn't to say all of them are going to be posers. They could be genuinely interested rookies, or knowledgeable people who have flown under the radar.
To be included, representation is going to be appreciated, and clammored for if it's felt lacking.
 

JellySlimerMan

New member
Dec 28, 2012
211
0
0
Rebel_Raven said:
One of her less wooden presentations, IMO. Still pretty stiff, though. It's hard to sit through her videos most times, and I commend people that do regularly.

The vid barely touches on videogames, and videogame culture which this thread is about.

The largest point seems to be that women want to be included for a safety/control factor, and it may be true for some women, but lets not pretend all of them are like that. I can't deny it happens just because that's the way it is because that's the way -humans- are wired.
We all want inclusion when all is said and done. When there's a group having fun, and we're not having as much fun, we want in. Guys, and gals will both play the poser to try and get in.
That isn't to say all of them are going to be posers. They could be genuinely interested rookies, or knowledgeable people who have flown under the radar.
To be included, representation is going to be appreciated, and clammored for if it's felt lacking.
The thread is about females taking over gaming via abusing the fact they are females and can get away with everything they do thanks to Double Standards at work (well, Female Hypoagency technically). And we can't say anything wrong about them cause, you know, saying that she has her hair on fire would be sexist, no matter how true that might be. Shining examples of this?:



I remember MovieBob (back when he was still sane) mentioning that gaming needs to clean its image, due to a bunch of assholes making us look bad.

GAME OVERTHINKER V33: Building a Better Gamer

But now the assholes of yesterday are gone, replaced by one similar in every single way (saying insults, whining about everyone but himself is to blame for the failure of the campaign, using racial/gender slurs, so on and so forth. We have seen it before) except....they are females now. And we can't do the same we did before to males this time cause......they are females? what is the difference here? an asshole is an asshole no matter what gender you are....except not for Jim and everyone else.
 

Rebel_Raven

New member
Jul 24, 2011
1,606
0
0
JellySlimerMan said:
Rebel_Raven said:
One of her less wooden presentations, IMO. Still pretty stiff, though. It's hard to sit through her videos most times, and I commend people that do regularly.

The vid barely touches on videogames, and videogame culture which this thread is about.

The largest point seems to be that women want to be included for a safety/control factor, and it may be true for some women, but lets not pretend all of them are like that. I can't deny it happens just because that's the way it is because that's the way -humans- are wired.
We all want inclusion when all is said and done. When there's a group having fun, and we're not having as much fun, we want in. Guys, and gals will both play the poser to try and get in.
That isn't to say all of them are going to be posers. They could be genuinely interested rookies, or knowledgeable people who have flown under the radar.
To be included, representation is going to be appreciated, and clammored for if it's felt lacking.
The thread is about females taking over gaming via abusing the fact they are females and can get away with everything they do thanks to Double Standards at work (well, Female Hypoagency technically). And we can't say anything wrong about them cause, you know, saying that she has her hair on fire would be sexist, no matter how true that might be. Shining examples of this?:



I remember MovieBob (back when he was still sane) mentioning that gaming needs to clean its image, due to a bunch of assholes making us look bad.

GAME OVERTHINKER V33: Building a Better Gamer

But now the assholes of yesterday are gone, replaced by one similar in every single way (saying insults, whining about everyone but himself is to blame for the failure of the campaign, using racial/gender slurs, so on and so forth. We have seen it before) except....they are females now. And we can't do the same we did before to males this time cause......they are females? what is the difference here? an asshole is an asshole no matter what gender you are....except not for Jim and everyone else.
At the same time, the thread is about the people trying to prevent women from getting any sort of foothold.
I feel like the satire in Jim's Vid is aimed to help guys understand what gets lobbed at women time and time again deservedly or not.

I think I need to put forth a disclaimer before I go on. I'm not accusing you of anything, nor am I accusing you of accusing me of anything. There's no implications either way, here.

This isn't a binary battle. There is no black, and white. There's a rainbow of people, opinions, and personalities involved. You shouldn't condemn a person to a lable just because they happen to agree with a movement you're not fond of.

If a woman speaks up about wanting more, and better (Not better than males, better than the status quo of women) representation, and the first thought you get is "Damnit, another one of -her- followers?!" or "Another feminist?!" then, well, kinda try to stop that train of thought? It seems like I run into this pretty commonly. It's a bit of a headache, especially when some people rant on, and on about it when their point is made clear long ago.

I definitely don't blame all men because some men disagree with me. I don't think a guy that's disagreeing with me is one of those MRA people I hear about. Frankly I don't care what they're representing, it's how they present it to me.

I guess I don't clearly see the whole "Oh my god, women are trying to take over games, and will lilely DESTROY US ALL!!!!" because I'm a woman who's not trying to take over, rather I just want more, good female protagonists, and maybe see things get shaken up a little to help shatter conventional wisdoms.
These things that don't necessarily require women being in charge of anything (Though I do say that input from several women for varied opinions couldn't hurt!), rather requiring people being more accepting that there's people who want more female representation in games, and them stop trying to prevent the creation of female protagonists.
Maybe sorta get back the creativity the game industry used to have which sorta got sapped away in some of the by the numbers game creation methods.

That doesn't mean I -want- those women that are trying to put every character in the game in a tuxedo, or pants suits, or ball gowns, or what have you to win. Nor the sort trying to abolish women being in violent situations as the violent, or the victim to win.
I likes me some Mai Shiranui. A violent, compeditive woman who's not as flat as she might seem in writing, in a dangerous scenario wearing, well, do I gotta gotta describe that?
I'm not saying there's no room for a woman like King from the same series as Mai Shiranui, either. King wears a tux in a bartender motif.
I'm a fan of diversity.

At the same time, I'm assuredly not going to throw in the towel, and shut up about wanting better written (compared to some other female protagonists) female protagonists, and more female protagonists than what we get.

I doubt you're saying I am, or intend to imply any of what I said above, I state it for clarity's sake. People often confuse me for a raging feminist.

And, yes, there's assholes on both sides. There's little that can be done about that.
What can be done? Police the assholes in a civil manner, male and female alike. Treat them with civility, kill them with kindness, and so forth. I doubt you're going to come off as a troll if you argue against their point in a kind, intelligent manner, and don't fall into their traps. Easier said than done, I know.

If they call you sexist, racist, bigoted in general, etc. when you've displayed nothing of the sort other than disagreeing with their points in a civil manner, then kindly point out that you're not arguing with them with any less respect than you would someone else. They shouldn't be able to cite anything you've said. If they do, explain, and shut them down.
Of course that's not a free ticket to be what you're fighting, an asshole, just because you're an ass to both genders, especially when you stoop to slurs, and insults. Level heads shall prevail, and all that.

Maybe, just maybe, if you see an asshole on your side of the argument, put the kabosh on them, and tell them to butt out if they're just spewing absurd hate. Easier said than done, I understand, but all they're doing is making the opposition less receptive, and more likely to generate their own assholes to counter, and add those to those that already exist. It can be difficult when you see they're obviously on your side, but are they really helping?
Aknowledge that there's asses on both sides of the argument.
I've no problems saying that both Jim, and Anita aren't the best representatives for trying to get women better representation in videogames. The problem is, who else is there? I'd love to know.

When all is said and done, you -can- disagree with, or call out anyone. The problem arises when you disagree with a person using slurs, threats, and so forth. When people put forth the notion you can't disagree unless you're sexist, bigoted, or something like that, perhaps they're basing it more off the trolls, and uncivilized people... Oh who am I kidding?! There's people who'll stoop to anything to defend their side.
The point is, you can disagree with them, and call them out, and doing so in a level headed manner will work wonders.

Lastly, we all have bad days. Being bombarded by hatred can make people angry. Judging a person when they say something once, is not the greatest idea. They may well be influenced by the BS they've been buried under. It's a matter of how consistent they are in being a bad person, IMO.

Now keep in mind I'm not accusing you of anything. I don't know you, and I think I've really read all of 2 of your posts lately, and you seem pretty level headed.

I doubt I'm following my own advice as well as I'd like, or prescribe. I've said it's often easier said than done in numerous suggestions of mine.
Hell, maybe I am one of the assholes? I don't know, but I know people have tried to talk to be about how passionate I can get on the matter. Still, like your second video states, we can strive to be better.

I doubt that any of what I said is news here, but I feel better having said it.
 
Jul 5, 2009
45
0
0
Therumancer said:
"what is your favorite Shadow Hearts transformation?"
Shadow hearts transformation? Hah! It's Shadow hearts FUSIONS, you're obviously one of those gamer guys that pretends to be a girl so he can fit in, begone with you!

OT: Fides, maybe Libertia, but Fides's attack up is too damn sexy. I needa get Shadow hearts 3...
 

JellySlimerMan

New member
Dec 28, 2012
211
0
0
Rebel_Raven said:
Let me go to Wikipedia for this, because apparently i ended up in another planet. In the meantime, watch the footage of this video in this timeframe 8:11 to 10:49.
And yes, i do know that the one making the video is also an asshole but i couldn't find the footage he was using, so i will use his video instead.

Oh here is it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asshole
The word is mainly used as a vulgarity, generally to describe people who are viewed as stupid, incompetent, unpleasant, or detestable.[6]

Say, does that word describes the people presented in that video? because i am pretty sure it DOES. Does that people just happen to be a female version of what we already have before? as in, assholes gun-ho male Bro-dudes that come from Brotopia, whining and bitching when no one pays attention to them and their Bro-tastic way of life, except with tits? they do, huh? how curious.

Ok, with that established, what is so fucking hard to understand? we have an asshole (that might be a man/woman/Cthulhu/a cat is fine too/God/Transexual/black/whatever) fucking around with a larger group of civilized people that just want to have fun (that might be a bunch of men/women/Cthulhu/a cat is fine too/God/Transexual/black/mixed people). Its presence its not tolerated cause it ruins the fun of everyone, therefore we either calmly tell them to GTFO until they behave, or get the PERMABAN.

That is ALL it EVER was, but nooooooooooooooo. The journalist have to pretend that its sexism or whatever, instead of actually looking at the facts, just like they did with the Hepler "controversy". I can't blame them, since they depend on sensationalism to make money after all, no matter who gets destroyed in the process.

It was never about sexism, its about common fucking courtesy. If it was about females being into gaming the shit would have hit the fan back when Amy Hennings worked for Crystal Dynamic to work on Legacy of Kain. And i REMIND YOU, that those guys invented Lara Croft, the sex symbol of gaming back then. If there EVER was a problem with females being in a "male space" then it would have started a looooooooong time ago.

Because that is what the video of Jim was about, right? mocking the idea of girl gamers taking over, right? its kinda self defeating to make such a video when you reverse the roles because, guess what?, it shows that BOTH genders can be assholes.......which is what we ALREADY know and established already.

So what boundaries have been pushed with this? other than the boundaries of the obvious?

Acknowledge that there's asses on both sides of the argument.
Ok..... what does that have to do with what i said? did i say that there were no assholes on my side? i say there are assholes, and whoever that asshole is, it must be told to GTFO.

I've no problems saying that both Jim, and Anita aren't the best representatives for trying to get women better representation in videogames. The problem is, who else is there? I'd love to know.
No one can. Except maybe Morpheus if they ever make it in Real Life?:

And just because there isn't someone fighting for the representation of women or whoever, that doesn't mean you have to do a piss poor job at it. The situation is already confusing BETWEEN the same ranks of Feminism (see the Ripley Vs Clarice Starling debate of a "proper" female protagonist). I am, however, offended to be playing as a human being instead of a robot or something. I feel that my Misanthrope Supreme + Asexual + Nihilistic tendencies are not represented or appealed properly :D
 

Rubescent

New member
Mar 26, 2013
3
0
0
The end of that video would have been infinitely more nerdy if jim used something more obscure like Psi-Ops instead of Killzone at the end using the exact same message just with a more less known title in which I say that watching that killzone footage I'm just aptly reminded of psi-ops even more and pretty much they took that idea from that game to theirs oh sure it's a nazi thing and so they didn't really but still the similarities are a bit uncanny to me