Well, this is getting attention (here at least ) because of how the author of the article is putting empathis on video games.TheNecroswanson said:How interesting.
Woman estranges husband, makes it impossible for him to sleep in his own bed, and says she's leaving.
Yup, clear cut case of a woman driving a man insane.
Well, at least it wasn't a sleight at myself, which I thought for a moment. Anyway, there is a link as in the original article it mentions both the prosecution and the defence mentioning the console and the testimony alleges to GTA.Therumancer said:Why is this article getting attention on "The Escapist", why because it mentions GTA, that is the only reason. Even if only to verify it's ridiculousness, how many hits have we given the guy?
That's what I ask whenever a school shooting is the first item on the TV news headlines. If they didn't give them so much attention then that sort of thing wouldn't happen so often. Doesn't really apply in this case, just an aside I wanted to make.KamachoMcSagget said:That's so sad, why'd you post this?
I think you're being a tad over defensive here.Therumancer said:The_root_of_all_evil said:Care to elucidate a little further there, Therumancer?Therumancer said:Hmmm, sounds like some reporter trying to get his name out there by using the well known "Grand Theft Auto" name to generate traffic.
... But whatever, the article has been written, and by discussing it we're giving the author exactly what he wanted.
I thought I explained in enough detail, sorry.
Basically the guy wants attention. The game "Grand Theft Auto" has gotten tons of attention from the press for YEARS for being excessively violent and anti-social, and then there was the whole "Hot Coffee" thing, and how the developers censored Manhunt and everything else. Basically people know the name Grand Theft Auto and react to it. Gamers defend it, and a lot of non-gamers think it should be banned.
If he just wrote the article straight up without the inane focus on the video-gaming aspects, it would have just been another "invisible" story about violence and tradgedy. Some guy thinks his wife is having an affair and he kills her for it. Tragic and horrible, but happens all the time. The writer's article gets lost in the tide of similar articles. Nobody is even likely to remember it in a couple of days it's so "normal".
But now he's focusing on the off the wall video gaming aspects, dropping the name "Grand Theft Auto" which is going to get attention. Gamers are reading his article to see what he actually wrote and going on rants, and the whole "we must censor games" movement is doing the same thing and will probably use this "case" to support their arguements in the future. It basically means his work is now out there.
The more we discuss it, the more attention it gets, and the more likely someone is likely to produce equally ridiculous spins on stories specifically to get the attention. Any publiicity being good publicity for a writer if it gets people to read his stuff.
Why is this article getting attention on "The Escapist", why because it mentions GTA, that is the only reason. Even if only to verify it's ridiculousness, how many hits have we given the guy?
bad rider said:James called the police after the attack. When they were on the line, his father took the phone from him and told the authorities, "I'm sorry. I think I've killed her."
After the twentieth stabbing you thought that did you? Really? I mean I would have thought after the tenth time you might have figured that.
Ahh well my apologies, no sleight was intended, bad communication on my part.The_root_of_all_evil said:Well, at least it wasn't a sleight at myself, which I thought for a moment. Anyway, there is a link as in the original article it mentions both the prosecution and the defence mentioning the console and the testimony alleges to GTA.Therumancer said:Why is this article getting attention on "The Escapist", why because it mentions GTA, that is the only reason. Even if only to verify it's ridiculousness, how many hits have we given the guy?
What I fail to see is how she actually managed to have an affair with all that time spent, and I think that was his delusion. There's enough evidence there to exonerate the original author this time I believe, and the Telegraph is one of the better tabloids. (Though that's not saying much)
It would have been a lot easier to blame the whole thing on GTA; the fact that the media are only using it as a sideline is at least starting to bring the issue back on track, and after JT, that's gotta be a good thing. Or at least we can hope that this won't get sensationalized now that the relevant details are out at the start.
Well, as he was wielding two knives, I think he was far too gone by that point.Therumancer said:In general I'd imagine if I was ever beaten/killed by some guy with a knife I'd have more than 20 wounds on me when it was over just going by what I've learned/seen.
rekabdarb said:i personally think it's more her fault than his because... she was going to move the fuck out because of GTA4 i'd be pissed to if my wife did that
I gotta say I didn't think about it that much. But I wouldn't go with against that idea it's likely he was overcome with rage and didn't stop stabbing in my mind. Then again thats an assumption, It's unlikely the details are gonna be revealed but hey Jack Thompson was right kinda, GTA causes violence, from people who don't play it.Therumancer said:bad rider said:James called the police after the attack. When they were on the line, his father took the phone from him and told the authorities, "I'm sorry. I think I've killed her."
After the twentieth stabbing you thought that did you? Really? I mean I would have thought after the tenth time you might have figured that.
Well the thing is that killing someone with a knife it's quite like it seems on TV, especially if your not trained to do it. Plus the police consider a lot of things "stab wounds" that might not strike you as being stabbing.
It's like this, you come after me with a hunting knife and kill me. In the struggle I'm likely to try and deflect the blade with my arms and such to prevent you from hitting my vitals. Each time you cut my arms they are considering that an injury and honestly if I'm trying to avoid being killed that's probably going to happen a lot. Then assuming you get me in the body, your probably not going to hit me in a place where I'm going to die immediatly. Getting through the rib cage to things like the heart is harder than it sounds, so you could very easily wind up stabbing me a bunch of times in the torso before I go down, and not realize when I was dead.
Now yeah, there are very efficient ways to kill people with knives, but most people can't do that kind of stuff.
20 Stab Wounds doesn't strike me as being a lot for an unskilled murder on a target able to defend themselves. People have survived as many as 60 stab wounds.
In general I'd imagine if I was ever beaten/killed by some guy with a knife I'd have more than 20 wounds on me when it was over just going by what I've learned/seen.
...?rekabdarb said:i personally think it's more her fault than his because... she was going to move the fuck out because of GTA4 i'd be pissed to if my wife did that
um... what?sorry user name taken. said:rekabdarb said:i personally think it's more her fault than his because... she was going to move the fuck out because of GTA4 i'd be pissed to if my wife did that
=/ nuh uh to you uh huh