"Medicine" in America

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
This is one of the reasons why I never want to live in the USA, I'd rather know that if I get ill or need surgery I won't become bankrupt to save my life. It's also horrible that the US pays billions upon billions to fly around the world murdering people but somehow can't find a fraction of that to cover at least some of the cost of their healthcare system (or lack thereof). They are happy enough to have socialised education, police, fire and postal services but social healthcare would apparently make everyone communists overnight.

Maybe one day they will join the rest of us in the first world. Until then we just have to watch as the wreckage piles up.
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
758
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
If many Americans weren't so damn gung ho about paying less taxes, then it wouldn't be an issue.

It's 2013 and they still have no universal healthcare. It boggles the mind that a first world country lacks such a system.

Here's a thought.

You know that obscenely huge military they have? You know, the big one.

Take like 5% of that budget, and there's your universal healthcare. No extra taxes, just the money redistributed elsewhere.

You should probably look after the people in your own country before making something to kill the populace of another.
But we can't do that, what if every other world increases navy? we might only have triple the number the aircraft carriers than any country in the world, and what then? We clearly need to match every aircraft carrier with our own and then some.
 

BishopofAges

New member
Sep 15, 2010
366
0
0
I am tired of the entire truckload of junk one has to do in order to get medical help these days, I would be happy if they just took out a chunk from my check. This chunk would guarantee that I can show up with a knife sticking out of my chest with a bloody sticky note attached that says "Fix it!" and not be hassled by every bit of paperwork that they can dream up.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
thaluikhain said:
I think you need to try to murder at least one ethnicity, and then if anyone complains, get defensive and so you were only doing it ironically, so you are above criticism.
Too much work. I preferred it when people called me a goth. All I had to do to live up to that was wear black occasionally.

...Seriously, I got asked a couple of hours ago why I always wear black. As I was standing in the hall of my building wearing a blue faux-tie-dye Hendrix shirt and blue lounge pants.

I think I've wander off the topic, which was...Why the stars shine at night!

No, wait.

Health care!

albino boo said:
Last year the the non profit NHS made record provision for medical negligence of £22.7 billion out of annual budget of £108 billion.
And? I didn't say that people weren't going to sue. I didn't say that it wasn't going to cost. I'm

To have a free at the point of use health service you would need to shut down the entire defense budget and some other departments as well.
Or, you know...cost control.
 

Jacco

New member
May 1, 2011
1,738
0
0
cthulhuspawn82 said:
shootthebandit said:
It seems to work here in the UK and a lot of other countries. Sure the system is far from perfect and the wards arent like a five star hotel but it does the job. What is america doing so wrong that we are doing right...or vice versa?
Healthcare is just insanely expensive here, way more than any other country. I could guess at some reason why but I'm sure the root causes are a topic of discussion for more educated individuals. I just have to leave it by saying "That's how it is here"

It's why the analogies to other countries with working healthcare systems don't always work. The government cant afford to provide all its citizens with a free MRIs when an MRI costs 10 times as much as in other countries. I think its been shown that America actually spends more on healthcare than many other countries yet has less coverage, all because of prices.
I worked in medical billing for a while.

The reason costs are higher here as opposed to Europe is because of many, many reasons, the largest being our population. The US has around 300 million people, or roughly 40% of the entire population of Europe COMBINED. This causes issues with supply and demand. People end up going to hospitals for bloody noses and colds which ends up costing the hospital time and money they could be using for other things. The capitalistic nature of our society (as opposed to the more socialistic nature of European society) also means that prices go up because companies and hospitals want to make a profit and people end up paying it.

It is also a problem with how higher education is set up. Going through medical school is astronomically expensive and because the government does not pay for a large portion of high education expenses, that cost ends up coming out of pocket. So doctors end up wanting more money to cover their loans and (in my opinion) they deserve it for working so hard and so long at something like that.

It is also a case of supply markups since there are so many middle men. Everyone needs to make money. So while a bandaid might only cost .02 cents coming straight from the manufacturer, it goes through the transportation system to the distributor who marks it up to cover costs of shipping and transportation, then it goes to the hospital which marks it up to cover those costs, and before you know it, a bandaid costs $3.00.

Put all those together with many other problems I'm not really in the mood to address here and you've got yourself an expensive industry.

The way I understand it works in Europe (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that the government covers and regulates the costs of all I mentioned above so that costs stay artificially down on the surface. It is also split up among however many countries there are so no one government is covering 300 million people at once.

That's why European-style universal health care will never work in the US. There are simply too many people. The only way I see it working here is if each state were to build its own government funded paying system and then manage that individually while the federal government helps keep medical school costs down via a stipend or something. But a single payer system would collapse. I mean, we already have Medicare an Medicaid and both of those are constantly being jury-rigged to keep them simply falling over.
 

Daverson

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,164
0
0
I don't see how anyone can justify a for-profit health service. It's like a for-profit police force, or a for-profit fire service.

"Sure, we'd love to find and arrest the person who burnt your house down, unfortunately your security insurance doesn't cover that."

Though... Actually, if we take that to it's logical extreme...

"Sure, we'd love to fend off the Cuban invasion, unfortunately your state's defence insurance doesn't cover that". BAM. World's best healthcare is now yours, for free. Problem solved.
 

BlackStar42

New member
Jan 23, 2010
1,226
0
0
Daverson said:
I don't see how anyone can justify a for-profit health service. It's like a for-profit police force, or a for-profit fire service.

"Sure, we'd love to find and arrest the person who burnt your house down, unfortunately your security insurance doesn't cover that."

Though... Actually, if we take that to it's logical extreme...

"Sure, we'd love to fend off the Cuban invasion, unfortunately your state's defence insurance doesn't cover that". BAM. World's best healthcare is now yours, for free. Problem solved.
I believe the Romans had a similar system.

"Oh, your house is on fire? Give me all your stuff and I'll put it out for you."

America's insanely expensive healthcare is one reason why I'd never want to live there. I like not being made bankrupt for health problems entirely out of my control.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Paragon Fury said:
So I've learned two things today:

1: I suck at this "being an adult". Leave for a haircut this morning. 5 hours, a trip to the hospital and 6 stitches later, still no haircut.

2: "Medicine" must be code for "profiteering racket". Because in the ambulance on my way to the hospital, the technician is offering me a paid yearly ambulance subscription service so I don't have to pay to use the ambulance if I need it.

I'll give that a moment to sink in. I'm sitting here with some my meat hanging out - covered, but still not where it should be (I look a bit like uncooked chicken on the inside apparently) - and they're trying to sell me something. I know I'm going to have to pay out the ass for the Emergency Room, the Doctor, the Stitches and the Care........and now she is reminding that the very needed trip to the hospital isn't even free.

If we're not even getting people to the hospital without charging them............
Move to a civilised country where surgeons don't wield a scalpel in one hand and a begging bowl in the other. /joke

Ok, seriously - here in the UK healthcare is part of everyday life. A person's National Insurance is taken out of their pay check before the money even hits their account so it's nothing we need to worry about. Just like the fire service or the police these things are paid for by taxes and if you need attention from any emergency service you get it, free of charge. That's not to say our system is without it's faults - the NHS is almost criminally underfunded, but this is because our government diverts NI funds from the NHS for other projects (most likely their second homes in the country) but that's the fault of government policy, not a problem inherent in the system.

I've never figured out why Americans hold the police and fire service in such heroic regard when they are paid for by taxes but view a healthcare system funded by the same means to be a horrendous idea. By the tone of your post, you're coming to that same conclusion.

Crap, this post is becoming more serious than I had originally intended.

Err, why not Zoidberg?

(V)(;,,;)(V)
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
thaluikhain said:
I think you need to try to murder at least one ethnicity, and then if anyone complains, get defensive and so you were only doing it ironically, so you are above criticism.
Too much work. I preferred it when people called me a goth. All I had to do to live up to that was wear black occasionally.

...Seriously, I got asked a couple of hours ago why I always wear black. As I was standing in the hall of my building wearing a blue faux-tie-dye Hendrix shirt and blue lounge pants.

I think I've wander off the topic, which was...Why the stars shine at night!

No, wait.

Health care!

albino boo said:
Last year the the non profit NHS made record provision for medical negligence of £22.7 billion out of annual budget of £108 billion.
And? I didn't say that people weren't going to sue. I didn't say that it wasn't going to cost. I'm

To have a free at the point of use health service you would need to shut down the entire defense budget and some other departments as well.
Or, you know...cost control.
The developed countries with a free a the point of use health care system spend between 10-12% of GDP on it. Taking the average of 11% of GDP that gives the US cost of running a free at the point of use health service at $1.2 trillion annually or roughly twice the US defence budget. You might be able to save as much $100 billion by cost control but not $600 billion. There is no management system in world that can cut cost by roughly the same size as the entire Belgian economy.
 

Demongeneral109

New member
Jan 23, 2010
382
0
0
Blood Brain Barrier said:
Xdeser2 said:
Honestly, I find the concept of Medicine and medical attention being a "Business" fucking abhorrent. You have to be a real Asshole to charge someone a ridiculous amount of money after saving their life.
Why? It is a business. No different whatsoever from lawyer, CEO or teacher.

Besides, you can imagine what's going through those doctors heads: "You deserve this. You went through 6 years of school so you could earn shitloads. You were reading books when the rest of your highschool class was getting drunk and laid. You're smarter than everyone else... etc etc"
He's saying that medical care shouldn't be considered a business, but something that exists to help others, not a profitable enterprise, but a sacrifice to help those in need. We don't pay teachers a fortune to place our very futures on their backs, why doctors for managing our present? If you say its because they have a tougher job, then BS, raise teacher salaries and standards to match, then we might get some achievers out of schools instead of unmotivated people with no drive to excel
 

Areloch

It's that one guy
Dec 10, 2012
623
0
0
Demongeneral109 said:
Blood Brain Barrier said:
Xdeser2 said:
Honestly, I find the concept of Medicine and medical attention being a "Business" fucking abhorrent. You have to be a real Asshole to charge someone a ridiculous amount of money after saving their life.
Why? It is a business. No different whatsoever from lawyer, CEO or teacher.

Besides, you can imagine what's going through those doctors heads: "You deserve this. You went through 6 years of school so you could earn shitloads. You were reading books when the rest of your highschool class was getting drunk and laid. You're smarter than everyone else... etc etc"
He's saying that medical care shouldn't be considered a business, but something that exists to help others, not a profitable enterprise, but a sacrifice to help those in need. We don't pay teachers a fortune to place our very futures on their backs, why doctors for managing our present? If you say its because they have a tougher job, then BS, raise teacher salaries and standards to match, then we might get some achievers out of schools instead of unmotivated people with no drive to excel

...really?

No, seriously? Really?

You really want me to hold in the same regard someone who's job is to merely pass along and re-iterate consumable knowledge(knowledge where, if - sorry, when - faulty, I can get from a multitude of other sources, oftentimes better presented and more accurate) to a person who went through half a decade or more of highly specialized training in order to keep someone alive? I respect teachers for what they do, but they do NOT operate to the same standards or requirements as a good doctor.
 

Filiecs

New member
May 24, 2011
359
0
0
A huge problem with our current system is that low-income patients without insurance can go to the Emergency Room for a bloody nose and don't need to pay a dime (the hospital just stops sending bills).

A much better system would be if the government funding was spent on giving everyone a doctor/health specialist to go to at a dramatically reduced price (like $0-$50 dollars per visit, the government would pay most of the bill) and those doctors focused on prevention and maintaining patient health.
This by itself would dramatically reduce the amount of expenses from unneeded emergency services as well as giving doctors/surgeons more time to care for ACTUAL emergencies.
Funding could also be used to reduce the prices of Urgent Care Clinics as well.

I believe that special treatment costs should stay high and almost always NEED to be paid eventually.
EMS should still be required to help those in need but I think that they should be a lot more strict on demanding repayment for their services, like school loans.

Insurance companies could focus on covering emergencies and special treatment instead of the doctors that they cover now. Insurance companies would also not have to worry so much about pre-existing conditions, smoking, drinking, or drug use because people would have doctors that they can go to in order to learn how to improve their lifestyle and prevent emergencies. As a result of everyone having doctors, hopefully insurance costs would go down.

Most Emergency Room visits can be prevented by simply visiting a doctor. If everyone had a doctor, millions of dollars in unnecessary emergency medical expenses could be saved and everyone would benefit.

Not everyone, however, needs Emergency Treatment and that is what most people have a problem with when it comes to paying for Universal Healthcare. If taxes didn't/rarely paid for EMS or special treatment then people wouldn't have a problem, especially so if everyone has the information necessary to prevent most medical issues from their doctor.
 

TheRealCJ

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,831
0
0
cthulhuspawn82 said:
shootthebandit said:
cthulhuspawn82 said:
So the problem isn't insurance companies a lack of a health care system. The problem is that those guys in the Ambulance, the doctors that treated you, and the hospital administrators, are all a bunch of greedy assholes. If the government wants to help us it should bring the hammer down on all the doctors and Ambulance drivers. Force them to do their job for a set price or go out of business.
Or the government step in and pay everyones healthcare with tax payers money. Sure you pay more tax but you know that when you go to hospital you dont have to pay a penny to get healthcare
The relevant question is this, why don't you pay for your healthcare out of your own pocket. You don't because you cant afford it. In America at least, the cost of healthcare is so high that nobody can afford to pay it. Nobody can afford to spend $2000 to sleep in a hospital bed for one night.

This is why universal healthcare wont work, at least for America. How is the government supposed to use our money to pay for something we cant afford? If their isn't enough money in our pockets to pay the bill then how can the government, which gets all of its money from our pockets, afford to pay the bill?
Er... one person has to pay 2000 dollars for a bed, or 200 million people each pay 5 dollars?

Let's use an example: Phone bills. Yes you pay for them every month, but what hurts more, 700 dollars for a new phone immediately, or ten dollars a month in repayments for two years? Which is easier to pay, even though you're paying MORE in the long run?
 

TheRealCJ

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,831
0
0
ten.to.ten said:
cthulhuspawn82 said:
This is the problem with universal health care. Those bills you mentioned don't go away. You don't pay them directly, but they still exist. This is good enough for some because if the sheep don't see the bill then they believe the bill doesn't exist.

So the problem isn't insurance companies a lack of a health care system. The problem is that those guys in the Ambulance, the doctors that treated you, and the hospital administrators, are all a bunch of greedy assholes. If the government wants to help us it should bring the hammer down on all the doctors and Ambulance drivers. Force them to do their job for a set price or go out of business.
What you just described is universal healthcare. Not all universal healthcare follows the single payer method where everyone is a member of the government's public insurer which is funded by taxes. Most countries that do have universal healthcare use a system which consists of strict price controls and regulations on private insurers and hospitals, combined with private insurance being mandatory for each person with the government paying for the insurance of those who can't afford it, Kind of like Obamacare plus Medicaid/Medicare on steroids.

America's not so special that universal healthcare couldn't work if the government actually tried, instead of half-assing it like the current Obamacare.
Well, to be fair, they HAVE to half-ass it or else it would be rejected outright. The American populace as a collective apparently has Aspergers; Any change, no matter how much better it is for them, is met with fear and resistance.
 

BlackStar42

New member
Jan 23, 2010
1,226
0
0
Areloch said:
Demongeneral109 said:
Blood Brain Barrier said:
Xdeser2 said:
Honestly, I find the concept of Medicine and medical attention being a "Business" fucking abhorrent. You have to be a real Asshole to charge someone a ridiculous amount of money after saving their life.
Why? It is a business. No different whatsoever from lawyer, CEO or teacher.

Besides, you can imagine what's going through those doctors heads: "You deserve this. You went through 6 years of school so you could earn shitloads. You were reading books when the rest of your highschool class was getting drunk and laid. You're smarter than everyone else... etc etc"
He's saying that medical care shouldn't be considered a business, but something that exists to help others, not a profitable enterprise, but a sacrifice to help those in need. We don't pay teachers a fortune to place our very futures on their backs, why doctors for managing our present? If you say its because they have a tougher job, then BS, raise teacher salaries and standards to match, then we might get some achievers out of schools instead of unmotivated people with no drive to excel

...really?

No, seriously? Really?

You really want me to hold in the same regard someone who's job is to merely pass along and re-iterate consumable knowledge(knowledge where, if - sorry, when - faulty, I can get from a multitude of other sources, oftentimes better presented and more accurate) to a person who went through half a decade or more of highly specialized training in order to keep someone alive? I respect teachers for what they do, but they do NOT operate to the same standards or requirements as a good doctor.
Knowledge=/= skill. Any fool can look things up on the Internet, butw ould you trust a self-taught surgeon to operate on a tumour, or a self-taught lawyer to represent someone at trial? Don't get me wrong, the Internet is an invaluable tool for learning, but teachers are very, VERY important.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
My family can barely handle the taxes we have now, so I won't support socialized medicine unless the government can somehow come up with the money for it without raising taxes(protip: not gonna happen). Also it would be nice if it could happen without doctors taking a paycut, seeing as they have some of the most expensive schooling and the worst jobs I kinda think they deserve to make good money. Additionally after hearing someone tell the story of how their grandmother died on a waiting list for a procedure (not a transplant) I don't really trust government run healthcare to be prompt.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
If many Americans weren't so damn gung ho about paying less taxes, then it wouldn't be an issue.

It's 2013 and they still have no universal healthcare. It boggles the mind that a first world country lacks such a system.

Here's a thought.

You know that obscenely huge military they have? You know, the big one.

Take like 5% of that budget, and there's your universal healthcare. No extra taxes, just the money redistributed elsewhere.

You should probably look after the people in your own country before making something to kill the populace of another.
But... but then the terrorists will win! And if we take 5% off of the military's budget, what's to stop them from taking another 5% and maybe re-jiggering our joke of an education system a bit?!?! Are you saying you'd rather have free healthcare and better schools over an obscenely huge military budget?!?!?!?!?!?! YOU DIRTY FUCKING SOCIALIST HIPPIE LIBERAL SCUM!!

Christ, this country sometimes...
 

Areloch

It's that one guy
Dec 10, 2012
623
0
0
BlackStar42 said:
Knowledge=/= skill. Any fool can look things up on the Internet, butw ould you trust a self-taught surgeon to operate on a tumour, or a self-taught lawyer to represent someone at trial? Don't get me wrong, the Internet is an invaluable tool for learning, but teachers are very, VERY important.
I should probably clarify my stance on this.
Yes, teachers are very important. As I said, I respect teachers for what they do. However, a majority of teachers are going to be teaching specific, re-iterative knowledge. Math class, for example. Exactly nothing stops you from going online, googling around, and learning how to do any given form of math.

Something like structural engineering, medical professors or the like, which need to be AT LEAST as versed as the people I was talking about being in a different tier from your average high school teacher are a totally different story, I agree completely.

Like everything, there's shades. As much as I respect your standard grade school/high school teachers and the like(and I really liked a lot of the ones I had), what they can provide - even at the top of their game - is distinctly apart from what a brain surgeon will do on a regular basis, or(as you validly point out) the people that train them will do.

On a whole, however, the service that doctors provide will largely warrant better pay and benefits compared to teachers.
 

Ruley

New member
Sep 3, 2010
192
0
0
America needs to take another look at Healthcare. I mean, maybe its a cultural thing, but i find it obscene to be charging for medical services. For things you have no control of - falling off a ladder, catching a virus, etc... Are you seriously asking for a credit card before you board the ambulance?

Here in the UK, we pay our taxes and healthcare is all covered by the NHS. Its just natural in this country. Hence my mention of it possibly being a cultural thing?

America puts so much money into everything else, as already has been mentioned, the military. If they really want to protect their people, surely America would bolster its healthcare for all?