Twilight did well too. Good "work" Bobby Kotick, you fro toting douche.
"You're a hater!"
Yeah I am. Suck it. Battlefield 3 is better and the developers put more work into it. You're just a cash farm for lazy fucks. Furthermore, supporting tired properties over and over destroys creativity and competition in the industry (good luck getting backing for a shooter that has to compete with the big dumb Juggernaut that is CoD in the "realistic" shooter department). Oh gee, horde mode. Great. Haven't lost every single person I used to compete with or do co-op with to mind numbing bullshit modes like that.
"Oh so because you don't like it must be bad!/You're not a reviewer fuck you!"
Oh right. Because I haven't been playing games for 18 fucking years at this point. Probably longer than many of you have even existed including your time as a spermy. I played all the Call of Duty games (before it was cool and on 360 you damned dirty snot nosed nublets). I played all the Battlefield games. Call of Duty was the game of choice until MW2. In fact for the longest time Battlefield had garbage infantry combat and the only saving grace was the squad/class based mechanics. Oh MW2 was shiny and cool and had neat stuff, but after all that it was just abusive tards ruining every match with glitches, unbalanced weaponry, and fine tuned youtube propagated camping positions. CoD 2 was the best game as far pure skill/twitch based FPS skills go. I still miss that game. Furthermore the only thing separating my opinion from that of a professional reviewer is that they can write. There isn't much they know about a game or how it functions that I don't. "Well you don't understand development then..." Yeah I do, I looked into it as a career path. Wanted to do animation or concept art. Your argument sucks more than mine. I simply say MW 2.5 is lackluster because I think it is and that is more than enough to qualify me to slap words onto a forum whether you like them or not.