Modern Warfare 3 Trailer Kicks Off World War III

katsabas

New member
Apr 23, 2008
1,515
0
0
Yeah, I am excited. Looks like the SP will be in more than one country and I really really like that. I can't wait to make Makarov taste the barrel of a Spas-12. I didn't buy Black Ops cause it featured stuff I didn't care about and the guns sounded like Nerf replicas.

If one thinks about it, this has been in dev 2 years now, since it is not made by Treyarch. However, the price will be 60 bucks and I am gonna have to give up some titles for that. No biggie, Prince Of Persia is a joke anyway.

About the MP, balance everyone by breaking everyone and everyone is happy.

Some people are complaining about gritty realism and stuff. Duke Nukem will be out by then.

What's real problem? How the hell can I choose between this and this?


 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
I am at a loss for words. Anything I could say has already been said. Getting this on day one.

Okay, not at a loss for words. I'm glad this game will draw the rest of the world into the conflict. That was something that bothered me about Modern Warfare 2. The U.S. got invaded, and no allies came in as back up. I couldn't imagine the U.S. counter-attacking against Russia without the rest of the world doing nothing. This is going to rock!
 

Nick31091

New member
Nov 21, 2009
35
0
0
Shoggoth2588 said:
but a firefight aboard the ISS would be pretty freaking sweet
The ISS got destroyed in MW2, alas.

Meh I wish I could stay excited about this game. MW1 was my personal introduction to the COD series and is still one of my favorite games of all time, and World at War wasn't too shabby either. If only MW2 wasn't such a train wreck, and the only fun levels for me in Black Ops were Khe Sahn and Hue City when the horrible story wasn't standing in the way...
 

idodo35

New member
Jun 3, 2010
1,629
0
0
Nurb said:
idodo35 said:
looks preaty cool ya know what would be nice?
that germany WONT be the bad guys for once... (i mean seriosly i think they had enogh...) maybie idk america? someone? evil usa?
no ha ok just make the germans evil again why not...
If you're talking WWII (which I agree is done to death), its not Germans that are the bad guys, it's the nazis, which is a distinction most make, and the US government has been the bad guys loooots of times in games
well no im talking wwIII (they are doing WWIII in that game pay atention) and i dont mean the goverment i mean the millitary maybie he took over the usa and now as a franch/german/eanglish solider your mission is to free the US from millitary control
and about WWII yes the nazis were the bad guys but they were refered as the german army and also ww1s "bad guys" were germans...
 

DefinitelyPsychotic

New member
Apr 21, 2011
477
0
0
The trailer looks awesome but I hope it doesn't turn out to be another shit game like MW2.
The trailers always look great, but the game-play on the other hand...
 

Reshkar

"Face to Face"
May 18, 2010
211
0
0
Aren't Activision planning on using a online subscription model for MW3 now? Plus these expensive map-packs. Meh, the game I'm looking foward to now, is Battlefield 3 :)
 

ChupathingyX

New member
Jun 8, 2010
3,716
0
0
Makarov must really hate countries with the letter "e" in their name.

Oh well, at least Australia is safe :)
 

Sud0_x

New member
Dec 16, 2009
169
0
0
Jumplion said:
God, they have really given up, haven't they? I mean, they aren't even attempting to hide how astronomically implausible, 'splosion ridden spectacularly, "OMG Russians invading US!"-y, "WORLD WAR THREEEEEE!"-y this is, are they? The CoD series have gone so far from the roots of CoD4 that they're the distance between Earth and Mars in how far off they are from each other. Yeesh.

I so want to go into a rant about how implausible this is. And I shall. First off, is Russia the only major opposing force? If so, how the hell are they able to fight on all these fronts? Secondly, how the hell was Russia allowed to invade the US in the first place? Because of a massacre in an airport that happened to have a CIA agent there? So? How does that let Russia attack the US while everyone is standing idly by? And what about the surveillance cameras, none of the guys in the massacre wore masks? Furthermore, wasn't it the ultranationalist leader who started it? How the hell did the other countries let an extreme fundamentalist ultranationalist lead Russia to unloading hell upon America? And what about the US General? Is he just a fucktard because he wanted to start World War III "just 'cause"? Because he is. What the hell does France or Germany have to do with this? AND WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?

Still, looks interesting. I won't buy it regardless as I am in a personal boycott against Activision, but to those who are excited for it, I wish you a good game. I say that with utmost sincerity.

But my god, people, you've got to admit that this series has become practically a parody of blockbuster action movies. It's not even trying anymore, they're just putting whatever set piece they can think up in their brains and slappin' it in the game by now!
http://kotaku.com/5801345/where-youll-go-how-youll-kill-and-who-will-die-in-modern-warfare-3

You've probably seen this by now since it's already been reported everywhere but I read this last week and I was in hysterics, then I got kinda mad at the writers for the "All of Russia iz be terrorizts" but then again I can't blame them, they're clearly underpaid. You were spot on though buddy, the plot is complete nonsense, it doesn't even fit the MW2 canon, massive plotholes.

If they release another MW2 (see: broken mess of a game) or BLOPS PC (I hear there were/are a lot of connection issues with online play) I suspect the series could lose a lot of its pull with their customers.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
As long as it doesn't have a crap opening premise, I look forward to see how this one delivers.
Maybe what comes out of MW3 will show if Infinity Ward really did need cleaning house.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
ChupathingyX said:
Makarov must really hate countries with the letter "e" in their name.

Oh well, at least Australia is safe :)
Of course Australia is safe, there is too much blood and gore in war.
 

RUINER ACTUAL

New member
Oct 29, 2009
1,835
0
0
Not trying to troll, because I do think the game could be pretty cool, but when does CoD become shovelware?
 

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Why are people getting so pumped up for this? It still looks godawful. I really don't get it. Have we learned nothing from CoD: Not Another WWII Shooter, MW2 and BlOps?

It's going to disappoint. Every one of the last 3 CoD games has. Or has everyone convinced themselves BlOps is good now?

Also why do I see a soldier with an American flag patch in France? I gotta think if we're getting invaded, we aren't really down for sending soldiers elsewhere, I think we've got enough problems.

Who the hell is even invading the entirety of the west? Russia? How and why? I asked this question in the teaser trailer, and not a single person answered.

They might as well have added "Herp derp" at the beginning of the dialogue. The Modern Warfare series was in the process of jumping the shark in MW2, it has finished that jump with these trailers.
According to the leak, russia is invading everybody's capital cities because they've conquered everything up till there. And the reason the americans are there is because everybody who isn't amerirican is an idiot incapable of doing anything without an emerican present(Soap/Price excluded because american 13 year olds like british accents on their protagonists)

And they're still copy pasting art assets from CoD4.
 

Namewithheld

New member
Apr 30, 2008
326
0
0
Man, that's...dumb.

MW2 was dumb on toast, MW3 looks like it has upped the ante.

"But, Namewithheld, it's just dumb fun!"

Well...

Okay, there's a difference between fun and insulting. Just because something isn't 'intellectual' does not mean that it's 'dumb'.

For example, one of my all time ever action films is Terminator. Terminator is stuff full of shootouts, car chases, explosions and has a kickass techno score. But never once do the action scene strain credulity, even though we're dealing with a cybernetic killer from the future. Why?

Because Terminator is INTERNALLY CONSISTENT. The rules are not broken within the film, and no one acts illogically within the constraints of their setting.

To bring the examples to video games, two of my favorite 'mindless action' games are the first Modern Warfare and Crysis.

MW has this thing called pacing and contrast. It has this thing called likable characters and a plot that actually made sense. And moreover, it was INTERNALLY CONSISTENT with it's setting which was, shockingly enough, the real world.

MW2 was not. It took place in this supposedly real setting, then had a Russian invasion thrown up with almost no set up or explanation. Homefront gets a load of flack, but at least it provides a more internally consistent explanation for it's invasion of the USA. The rest of the game failed, but at least the set up was interesting.

And what really bugs me is that...

We should expect.

No, we should DEMAND better than this! Why?

Because action becomes more impactful when it's strung together with a meaningful plot! Because it's not that hard to write a goddamn action plot that has a load of explosions and not have it suck.

Lets see...

You play as a mercenary in the near future, tasked with the location of a prominent scientist who has fled into a third world country with a nanotechnological weapon that could turn half the continent into gray goo. Half the damn planet wants their mitts on it, so you have to fight other merc squads, the local militia and rebel forces, all the while uncovering the true reason behind the scientists flight!

You play as a MP who serves on a US military base in Japan, when suddenly the world is invaded by aliens!

You play as a teenager drafted into a near future war fought in Earth's orbit and on the lunar surface, between loyalists and separatists in the lunarian civil war!

You play as an Imperial guardsman in the Warhammer 40,000 universe

You play as a soldier in WWII, but with a twist: It takes place in a world where magic is real. Your gun is a magic wand, airplanes are dragons, and life essense is the most powerful magic of all, meaning you have to reload by slitting your enemies throats, and the Holocaust gives the Nazi-stand-ins a huge magical weapon to use against you.

You play as a soldier in WWII, but with a twist: The Manhattan project wasn't to build a nuke, but rather to give someone SUPER-POWERS. So now the war includes superbeings duking it out in colorful outfits and you are one of the first test subjects.

You play as a soldier in a futuristic war between humanity and machines, only to be captured halfway through and find out that the machines are actually quite nice once you get to know them, and switch sides.

I can do this all night...
 

Charconian

New member
May 24, 2011
2
0
0
Wow like wow. I guess the latest Jimquisition was right, everyone does hate what a "terrible" game CoD is. Aside from that, WOW the ASSUMPTIONS!!!
 

Iron Mal

New member
Jun 4, 2008
2,749
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Why are people getting so pumped up for this? It still looks godawful. I really don't get it. Have we learned nothing from CoD: Not Another WWII Shooter, MW2 and BlOps?
In my opinion it actually looked pretty good, the bits in Britain actually looked like places I've been to in London so that alone for an American developer is pretty damn impressive.

You may have your grieviences with the Call of Duty series, and that is your choice and no-one else's, but that doesn't make anyone else feeble minded or lesser for being excited about this game.

It's going to disappoint (me). Every one of the last 3 CoD games has (disappointed me). Or has everyone convinced themselves BlOps is good now?
I believe that my little corrctions there more accurately reflect what the real truth behind your statement is. I actually enjoyed Black Ops and thought that, despite having a somewhat hard to follow plot, was overall a good game both in single and multiplayer (my reason? I had fun playing it, do I need a better reason than that or is the concept of fun beneath you?).

Not the stuff of legend but still a great game that I would give positive reccomendation to, it didn't disappoint me, maybe you expected more from it than I did but saying something was 'disappointing' says not so much about the game as it does about what you were expecting from it (I found Half Life 2 and the Orange Box to be very disappointing considering how much I was hearing about the games inside).

Also why do I see a soldier with an American flag patch in France? I gotta think if we're getting invaded, we aren't really down for sending soldiers elsewhere, I think we've got enough problems.
That is an actual plot hole right there, it might have just been a mistake in editting and animation (slip ups like that can happen) or there may be an in-game explanation for it.

The only way we'll find out is to wait for it to come out and give it a chance.

Who the hell is even invading the entirety of the west? Russia? How and why? I asked this question in the teaser trailer, and not a single person answered.
Why were we not told in the trailers for Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes back that Lando Calrisian will turn out to be a back stabbing bastard? In hindsight this seems like an almost painfully obvious plot turn but back then, when no-one had seen it yet, it actually did come as a suprise.

Maybe the suprisingly large scale of the invasion does have an in-game explanation (I'm sure that America has more than enough enemies that oneor a combination of them can provide a fitting explanation as to why), maybe it's supposed to be a suprise twist, maybe there is no reason and it's just shoddy writing.

You know how we'll know? By playing the freaking game and finding out for ourselves.

They might as well have added "Herp derp" at the beginning of the dialogue. The Modern Warfare series was in the process of jumping the shark in MW2, it has finished that jump with these trailers.
Are you trying to imply that this is honestly the most stupidly written plot that you've seen recently?

So we're discounting FEAR (where a psychic clone army activates because of the will of a little 'The Ring-esc' girl and stages a minor invasion of the urban US), Metal Gear Solid 4 (I could be here writing essays trying to explain the abstract craziness in that one), Bioshock 2 (Communist cultists under the sea want to play God, only one man can stop them), Splatterhouse (we're sorry Rick but your princess is in another Elder God's plane of existance), Bad Company 2 (which basically copied Modern Warfare 2 and tried, badly, to be witty about it), Lost Planet 2 (Evil Government tries to kick start global warming/ice age because...hey, why not?), anything from the Command and Conquer series (seriously, that crap gets weird sometimes) and Mass Effect 2 (or as I like to call it, 'I just made Space Cthulhu my *****')?

I would say most of those games are absolutely brilliant (except Bad Company 2 and FEAR but I had to make a point) yet all of them have had times where their plot has gone completely haywire (sometimes this is partially why those games are so good).

My overall point I'm trying to make here is basically to actually wait for the damn game to come out before you start deriding others for actually being excited for what may turn out to be a good game, wait until you actually have a game to judge before you start raining on other people's parades (especially since most of your issues seem to stem purely from you personally not being much of a CoD person, that's fine and all but acknowledge that it also fine that it's no less acceptable to be a CoD fan).