Morrowind 2011 Mod Collection Pulled After Complaints

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
Caiti Voltaire said:
Fumbleumble said:
No offence mate... but that's absolute garbage.

EVERYONE has to abide by the same agreement... Bethesda CANNOT start making up rules for one person and not for others. If Bethesda makes an agreement... that agreement binds EVERYONE.. whether Bethesda likes it or not... YOU have no understanding of how the law works.

What is sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander.
Sure they can. Its their property. They own it. It may or may not be morally correct, or ethical, for them to do certain things with it, but so long as they don't break any laws, they can do whatever the fuck they want with MODs made using TESCK.

[edit]: I suspect this is good reading for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
Dude.... you've MISUNDERSTOOD what you have read..... Once Bethesda create a set of conditions and 'asks' the law to enforce those conditions... those conditions then become SET IN STONE, even if Bethesda don't like it.

Have you never heard the expression 'The Law is a Double edged weapon'... that's what it means.
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Fumbleumble said:
This is irrelevent.... this is the way thing have been accptably done since modding began (and it's EXACTLY the same way in which the modders themselves have given credit)...... it has become "law through usage", until tested.
Obviously you're wrong, otherwise the mod creators wouldn't be outraged. Or maybe their just pissed off about this guy not even asking for permission. Either way, if the original mod creators wanted this taken down, I'd have to agree with them. It's their work.
You've said that I'm wrong because they wouldn't be upset otherwise...You've assumed them to be correct bolstering that fact that I'm wrong.. it's the other way around. They don't have a 'right' to be perturbed, other than the fact that they don't like it.

And anyway.. it's NOT their work... they may have done the work, but they have no legal say in how it's used. All Rights Reserved... by Bethesda.
 

Freyar

Solar Empire General
May 9, 2008
214
0
0
This is a stupid knee-jerk reaction by people that think they are entitled to more than they are. You work on a mod for a copyrighted work to which the agreement to make a mod states you have no copyright claim for it, only to make a legal threat like that when it gets distributed along with high visibility on news sites?

This seems completely counter-intuitive to the end-goal for modders. I've written one or two here, I'd rather have my content distributed with my name on it, that's it. Bad form, mod-devs... how the hell can we PC gamers support you when this kind of flare up lights up the sky like a nuke from orbit [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q].

Console tards are laughing at us now aren't they? "We don't have to worry about things like that 'cause Activision is the only one that makes it!"
 

Caiti Voltaire

New member
Feb 10, 2010
383
0
0
Fumbleumble said:
Dude.... you've MISUNDERSTOOD what you have read..... Once Bethesda create a set of conditions and 'asks' the law to enforce those conditions... those conditions then become SET IN STONE, even if Bethesda don't like it.

Have you never heard the expression 'The Law is a Double edged weapon'... that's what it means.
When you read the link I posted, we can continue this discussion, until then, I don't mean to be rude, but you very obviously don't grasp the legal concepts involved, so you shouldn't be commenting on them.

Court agreements in civil courts do not generally create binding precedent.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Fumbleumble said:
You've said that I'm wrong because they wouldn't be upset otherwise...You've assumed them to be correct bolstering that fact that I'm wrong.. it's the other way around. They don't have a 'right' to be perturbed, other than the fact that they don't like it.

And anyway.. it's NOT their work... they may have done the work, but they have no legal say in how it's used. All Rights Reserved... by Bethesda.

Just because they have no legal authority over how the mods is used doesn't mean their complaints are unjustified. If you honestly think this guy using their mods without asking and giving them next to no credit is fine, you don't have any respect for modders.

For the record though, I don't think the modders threatening him with legal action is acceptable.
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
Caiti Voltaire said:
Fumbleumble said:
Dude.... you've MISUNDERSTOOD what you have read..... Once Bethesda create a set of conditions and 'asks' the law to enforce those conditions... those conditions then become SET IN STONE, even if Bethesda don't like it.

Have you never heard the expression 'The Law is a Double edged weapon'... that's what it means.
When you read the link I posted, we can continue this discussion, until then, I don't mean to be rude, but you very obviously don't grasp the legal concepts involved, so you shouldn't be commenting on them.

Court agreements in civil courts do not generally create binding precedent.
They're not binding ANYTHING... Bethesda already set the conditions... they're 'just reading what it says on the tin'

So that means.. under YOUR way of thinking.. Bethesda could, one week sue someone for making their sky pink.... then in the next week sue someone else for NOT making their sky pink.

Bethesda CANNOT make the rules up as they go along... the rules are set.

Bethesda has AN OPTION to change the conditions, but then EVERYONE else has AN OPTION to take legal action against the new conditions.

Sony had to settle out of court for withdrawing their Linux support.. BECAUSE they changed THEIR legally binding conditions on how their hardware worked.
 

Booze Zombie

New member
Dec 8, 2007
7,416
0
0
So, what, this guy puts together this great compilation of mods and works hard to make them work together without conflicting and people are complaining?
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Fumbleumble said:
You've said that I'm wrong because they wouldn't be upset otherwise...You've assumed them to be correct bolstering that fact that I'm wrong.. it's the other way around. They don't have a 'right' to be perturbed, other than the fact that they don't like it.

And anyway.. it's NOT their work... they may have done the work, but they have no legal say in how it's used. All Rights Reserved... by Bethesda.

Just because they have no legal authority over how the mods is used doesn't mean their complaints are unjustified. If you honestly think this guy using their mods without asking and giving them next to no credit is fine, you don't have any respect for modders.

For the record though, I don't think the modders threatening him with legal action is acceptable.
Dude... we're not talking rightful or ethical justification here.....

If we WERE then I would quite happily consign the entire industry to the depths of hell.
 

beef623

New member
Jun 7, 2010
17
0
0
Morrowind EULA said:
You may not cause or permit the sale or other commercial distribution or commercial exploitation (e.g., by renting, licensing, sublicensing, leasing, disseminating, uploading, downloading, transmitting, whether on a pay-per-play basis or otherwise) of any New Materials without the express prior written consent of an authorized representative of Bethesda Softworks. This includes distributing New Materials as part of any compilation You and/or other Product users may create. You shall not create any New Materials that infringe upon the rights of others, or that are libelous, defamatory, harassing, or threatening, and You shall comply with all applicable laws in connection with the New Materials. You are only permitted to distribute the New Materials, without charge (i.e., on a strictly non-commercial basis), to other authorized users who have purchased the Product, solely for use with such users' own authorized copies of such Product and in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all applicable laws. If You distribute or otherwise make available New Materials, You automatically grant to Bethesda Softworks the irrevocable, perpetual, royalty free, sublicensable, right and license under all applicable copyrights and intellectual property rights laws to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, perform, display, distribute and otherwise exploit and/or dispose of the New Materials (or any part of the New Materials) in any way Bethesda Softworks, or its respective designee(s), sees fit. You also waive and agree never to assert against Bethesda Softworks or its licensees any moral rights or similar rights, however designated, that You may have in or to any of the New Materials. As noted below, if You commit any breach of this Agreement, Your license and this Agreement shall automatically terminate, without notice.

Your breach of this Section shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and/or of applicable copyright and other intellectual property rights laws and treaties, and may subject You to civil and criminal liability.
My legalese isn't that great, but it sounds to me like the mod creators (not the guy that repackaged them) are the only ones who would be in violation of anything by threatening the guy that did the repackaging...
 

Aquin

New member
Oct 26, 2010
2
0
0
Of course, everyone here is ignoring the fact that the dude in question is a Canadian.

I'm from Canada too. We don't have DMCA up here. In fact, we can pretty much pirate whatever we want with little in the way of legal consequences. I'm not saying that's what happened here and I'm not saying what's right or wrong.

But they can't nail him with a DMCA take-down notice or otherwise touch him. Not if he's running the operation from our country, anyway.
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Fumbleumble said:
Dude... we're not talking rightful or ethical justification here.....
That's exactly what I've been talking about.
But you're condemning the guy for being in the right, which then makes everything you are saying a matter of opinion....but you 'state' it with such force as if your opinion in this matter actually means something. you can't do that.

The guy crumbled to UNFOUNDED legal threats backed up by shitty underhanded dealings by Bethesda... and you're all saying quite right.

I'm say NO F**KING WAY.

If you want to ***** and moan about how unfair the law is, then... :D.. be my guest... ***** about the law... but don't use that as justification to beat the guy about the head and neck with the broken bottle of rightousness.... when ALL he's done is EXACTLY the same as what EVERY modder has EVER done... except that that the only people who ACTUALLY DO GET A SAY IN THE MATTER, don't mind.
 

Caiti Voltaire

New member
Feb 10, 2010
383
0
0
beef623 said:
Morrowind EULA said:
You may not cause or permit the sale or other commercial distribution or commercial exploitation (e.g., by renting, licensing, sublicensing, leasing, disseminating, uploading, downloading, transmitting, whether on a pay-per-play basis or otherwise) of any New Materials without the express prior written consent of an authorized representative of Bethesda Softworks. This includes distributing New Materials as part of any compilation You and/or other Product users may create. You shall not create any New Materials that infringe upon the rights of others, or that are libelous, defamatory, harassing, or threatening, and You shall comply with all applicable laws in connection with the New Materials. You are only permitted to distribute the New Materials, without charge (i.e., on a strictly non-commercial basis), to other authorized users who have purchased the Product, solely for use with such users' own authorized copies of such Product and in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all applicable laws. If You distribute or otherwise make available New Materials, You automatically grant to Bethesda Softworks the irrevocable, perpetual, royalty free, sublicensable, right and license under all applicable copyrights and intellectual property rights laws to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, perform, display, distribute and otherwise exploit and/or dispose of the New Materials (or any part of the New Materials) in any way Bethesda Softworks, or its respective designee(s), sees fit. You also waive and agree never to assert against Bethesda Softworks or its licensees any moral rights or similar rights, however designated, that You may have in or to any of the New Materials. As noted below, if You commit any breach of this Agreement, Your license and this Agreement shall automatically terminate, without notice.

Your breach of this Section shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and/or of applicable copyright and other intellectual property rights laws and treaties, and may subject You to civil and criminal liability.
My legalese isn't that great, but it sounds to me like the mod creators (not the guy that repackaged them) are the ones who would be in violation of anything by threatening the guy that did the repackaging...
Yes, they would be in violation of the agreement, and would not have a legal standing in the case if they were to sue, because they did not own the rights which were allegedly infringed upon.
 

Freyar

Solar Empire General
May 9, 2008
214
0
0
Falknarr said:
It may have been stupid not to ask for permission, granted. But threatening with legal consequences instead of trying to resolve this thing peacefully was just as retarded, if not even more. Now there is no way of de-escalating this.
And just as it is common courtesy to ask for permission, shouldn't it also be common courtesy to simply inform this guy that what he did was not correct, and that he should clarify the ownership of these mods a bit more prominently? I mean, what is this? "Make one mistake and your ass is mine"? "Don't fuck with us, because we are legion"? Is it really too much to ask for to resolve this like adults and not screaming children?
It just proves that while I'd like to see the stereotype of top-hat-and-monocle-wearing continue, it just goes to show that we aren't really that much better as a whole than other platform's community, if not less so.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Fumbleumble said:
Internet Kraken said:
Fumbleumble said:
Dude... we're not talking rightful or ethical justification here.....
That's exactly what I've been talking about.
But you're condemning the guy for being in the right, which then makes everything you are saying a matter of opinion....but you 'state' it with such force as if your opinion in this matter actually means something. you can't do that.

The guy crumbled to UNFOUNDED legal threats backed up by shitty underhanded dealings by Bethesda... and you're all saying quite right.

I'm say NO F**KING WAY.

If you want to ***** and moan about how unfair the law is, then... :D.. be my guest... ***** about the law... but don't use that as justification to beat the guy about the head and neck with the broken bottle of rightousness.... when ALL he's done is EXCATLY the same as what EVERY modder has EVE done... except that that the only people who ACTUALLY DO GET A SAY IN THE MATTER, don't mind.

What are you even talking about now? You're rambling about stuff that isn't even related to this. I never said anything about how unfair the law is.

Here's the bottom line; this guy took a bunch of modders work, used them without their permission, and gave them little credit. Most of the people who made these mods were not happy with this, and wanted the mod taken down. I think they are perfectly justified in doing this.

That's it.
 

Viivrabe

New member
Sep 24, 2009
88
0
0
well well well
isn't this a bit of a mess we have here.

I'd offer a soluion to all the problems with this but im not entirely sure who did what for what reason, so i can not.

if more information is released involving who has the problem and why specifically then i will offer a solution, but allas I'm to lazy to do the research myself and i dought we will get any more from an official post on The Escapist so after i finish downloading it this topic is dead to me
 

Bloodstain

New member
Jun 20, 2009
1,625
0
0
But....but....I haven't downloaded it yet. o.o
That makes me very, very sad.

What is their problem, anyway? It's not like he is making money off it.
 

Kefo

New member
May 19, 2010
112
0
0
If I were the guy I would have left it up so the asshats who threatened legal action would have to get a lawyer and have them tell them "you're a complete moron. You are going to sue someone for work you dont own and that you posted to the internet to share with others and that he didnt charge for...that will be 300 dollars please"