Unless that bit about "WiiFeel" is true, developers should NOT have you switch between an inventory in real time at a fast pace. Otherwise, I don't see what's so hard about pausing the game, looking down and selecting your shit.Reyalsfeihc said:I`m honestly quite surprised no one`s brought this up yet but if the controller is projecting your inventory or something important that means you`ll either have to have amazing peripheral vision, hold the controller out in front of your face, or constantly look up and down.
You're entirely right. I think for some things, where the information is useful but you don't need to access it often (like an inventory) this will be fine. However I bet plenty of games will display the game map down there and make navigating a tremendous pain.Reyalsfeihc said:I`m honestly quite surprised no one`s brought this up yet but if the controller is projecting your inventory or something important that means you`ll either have to have amazing peripheral vision, hold the controller out in front of your face, or constantly look up and down.
The 3DS Didn't fail, it just didn't sell as fast as it was suppose to, but with the upcoming Legend of Zelda, Mario Kart, Super Mario, Star Fox, and others, it's going to start selling like hot cakes.4RM3D said:Based on expectations:
The 3DS failed
The WiiU failed
Nintendo seems to be in a downward spiral here.
Well it is a new console and it's hardware capacity is way better than both the ps3 and xbox 360. : p still for me it will depend on what games get made for it.Canadish said:I know myself, and every gamer I've spoken to (that I know personally) laughed when we saw it.
I just don't see what this brings to the table really...
I don't think casual family gamers are going to get particularly exited about this. It looks like a big Gameboy to them.
As stated above, Nintendo abandoned hardcore gamers, and we're already invested in our other consoles. Too little to late.
Who is this exactly marketed at then?
Unless we get a really cheap price point for this, I don't see it taking off.
Failed to live up to expectations so far4RM3D said:The 3DS failed to live up to the expectations
The WiiU failed to live up to the expectations
There, I fixed it. But then again, maybe people were expecting too much or didn't really know what to expect.
Did Nintendo release the specs on the WiiU, I was under the impression they hadn't released the tech specs yet.qeinar said:Well it is a new console and it's hardware capacity is way better than both the ps3 and xbox 360. : p still for me it will depend on what games get made for it.
I think it proves we need to delete cliche, because it's seriously becoming a cliche to call things cliched.John Funk said:Once again, this just proves the need to delete the word "gimmick" from the English language.
Damn, I got beat to the punch.Logic 0 said:Time to buy up nintendo shares and make a profit.
But without useless buzz-words, hatedoms will actually have to think before bashing something!John Funk said:Once again, this just proves the need to delete the word "gimmick" from the English language.
Chosen One!Jumplion said:Ow, that's gotta hurt.
The WiiU (Weeueeueueeuueeuu [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JElywbkSbY])
Desert Tiger said:It kind of looks like a GBA swallowed a PSP and then had sex with a baby monitor.
If you were smart, you bought a Wii for the awesome first party games. If you are smart next gen, you will buy a Wii U for the same reason (and probably more). With graphics at least 4-5 times more powerful than the 360/PS3 (at least according the rumors about it having an R700 chip) and games that will benefit from that, it will be a worthy step forward. Of course, this is all just speculation. Everything here is just speculation, including the nonsense people are spouting about it being barely more powerful than the 360. It also looks like Microsoft will be focusing on Kinect for the next few years... so if people REALLY want to stay with them then I guess that's their choice.SteelStallion said:Exactly my point! Nintendo left their hardcore fanbase waving in the wind after they went for a more casual audience with the Wii. Since then, the hardcore audience has invested itself into the other consoles and PC gaming. The Wii is trying to win back an audience that's found new interests else where.zehydra said:Hardcore gamers were at one point the core audience of Nintendo. They're trying to bring that back.SteelStallion said:It's understandable. No one's excited for it.
With the move from the Gamecube to the Wii, Nintendo tapped into a vast previously dormant market, the casual gamer. They appealed to millions upon millions of family gamers who enjoyed the easy going motion controls that did way with the complicated controllers and keyboards and introduced a variety of family friendly games.
What they're trying to do with the Wii U makes absolutely no fucking sense. Instead of trying to further enrich their core casual gamer audience, they're trying to grab the attention of hardcore gamers.
It's not going to work. We're already invested in our Xbox 360s and PS3s and PCs. The Wii U, from what we've seen, is basically the processing power of a current gen console with a touch screen built into its controller. It's a silly gimmick that tries to appeal to hardcore gamers instead of casual gamers.
A fatal, fatal mistake by Nintendo. They're trying to tread on ground they're already defeated on instead of going after the casual market which they've dominated for so long.
Whether or not it pays off, we'll see.
Way to know what you're talking about. This is a home console that has the ability to stream games to the controller. It's not a portable device, you can't move this too far away from the system.tehweave said:This. Nintendo reveals successor to the Wii... It's a portable device. Capable of playing games at better graphics than the Wii. You know, the 3DS... I mean DS... I mean WiiU.SteelStallion said:It's understandable. No one's excited for it.
Seriously. They have three hand held devices now. That cannot support each other's games. This is dumb.