They don't "have it", I can say "******" I just can't call black people that. Because that is OBVIOUSLY inflammatory!ElPatron said:Double standards. They can have the N-word. [sarcasm]What if from now on, anyone who breaks into my property will get a warning or a shot depending on his colour [/sarcasm]. After that sentence double standards don't seem so good now, do they?
Also, by your logic the fact that I have an ambiguous sexual orientation allows me to use the word "gay". Because I am protected under your double standard.
You get that? RIGHT? How things are inflammatory? Context! WHO says WHAT to WHOM! This is why words are not actually banned. The n-word is not banned, what is banned is racial threats which are up to the courts to decide, not a dictionary. The law is not so pig-headed and inflexible as you'd like to assume.
What the hell does all that have to do with breaking into people's property? What is the relation between the crime of burglary and the history of slavery and racism? REALLY! There is nothing! The way you should treat and intruder in your home should be based on the tangible and actual threat they pose, not judge by skin colour. Like if they have a weapon, or many accomplices, or if they are advancing on you threateningly.
Also, it's not a double standard because "gay" is not and offensive term as homosexuals have used it to self-indentify. However "******" is, it IS inflammatory to call a gay person a "fag" or "******" for how it incites hatred and difference. But not for one person who is unambiguously gay to say to another.