I so thought that said "I was 100lbs once," and was freaking out at the thought of you losing 73 of those pounds, lolol.Brutal Peanut said:At one point I was 100lbs overweight - clearly in the 'obese' category. I have lost 73lbs so far.
I so thought that said "I was 100lbs once," and was freaking out at the thought of you losing 73 of those pounds, lolol.Brutal Peanut said:At one point I was 100lbs overweight - clearly in the 'obese' category. I have lost 73lbs so far.
Better yet, ditch healthcare systems all together. I really, really don't understand why we have them. You give the greedy assholes more money than you will ever use on healthcare, then some of it is used to help strangers who may or may not have caused their own problems. If people want to be in that sort of a system, let them. But in my country everyone pays for basic healthcare through taxes. That's bullshit.Brian Conmy said:Over a month ago I stood on the scales and was actually disgusted with the weight I was at, 'll admit it was 241 pounds. 'm only 5'10, that's a ridiculous weight. Since then with basic diet and exercise 'm already down to 224lbs and am not gonna stop till I hit a weight 'm happy with. This was my choice but even in the limited time 've been losing weight I notice I already judge people based on their shopping baskets in grocery stores. It's involuntary and I don't like judging people but it's hard when you see someone massively overweight with a basket full of pizzas and white bread.
I don't think it's right to discriminate based on weight but the obesity epidemic is increasing healthcare costs at a time when money is tight for everyone. When a few people's choice (not everyone who's overweight is in control of it and I don't wanna discriminate against those people) affects the rest of us then... Maybe we can positively discriminate? Get health insurance cost decreases for people in healthy weight ranges or something. Just a thought
Yes, it's easy (and, in the current environment, even tempting) to accuse failed dieters of lacking "willpower" and being overly fond of cake.Spineyguy said:Again it's about having the willpower. Most people choose to lose weight based on some absurd aesthetic ideal or because they think that a few extra months of ill health and agony at the end of their life is worth it, then they remember that they like cake and suffer a relapse. It takes a lot of hard work and discipline to lose weight and maintaining that level of concentration is even harder.
I can tell. While you did accuse failed dieters of being weak-willed, you weren't rabid about it.When all is said and done, it's simply not worth the effort in my mind. I, however, am tremendously lucky that I am not naturally prone to gaining weight.
I profoundly disagree with the notion that fat jokes aren't funny. The only thing more funny than a fat person in difficulty is an alcoholic who can't get to his drink.Daystar Clarion said:Save the whales, harpoon a fat chick
[sub]Can't remember where I heard that line but it's freakin' terrible[/sub]
Being fat is associated with greed and/or a lack of self control/discipline.
It's understandable that people would want to paint those personality traits in a negative light, but at the same time, fat jokes stopped being funny a long time ago.
I actually agree with this. (People seriously do that?)MetalMagpie said:I don't have a problem with people carrying a bit of extra weight. I have a problem with people who think that being fat is a disability that they should get special benefits for.
Be fat if you like. I really couldn't care less. But stop demanding that the government pay for your gym membership. If I have to pay rip-off rates to take my un-special body to the gym, then I don't see why someone else should get it for free just because they weigh more than I do.
Note: Having a diagnosed medical problem that causes excessive weight gain is a disability. Just being fat is not.
Attitudes towards women's bodies are seriously fucked up. That's probably a whole 'nother rant in its own right.And while I'm grumbling: Every time some "supportive" person labels a curvy lady as a "real woman", it feels like they're spitting in my face. Big boobs, hips, etc. are not a requirement for being a "real woman".
At the risk of being called an Obama-loving, hippy, fuck, don't you think that societies should look after people? I mean, what if you've got a person who has worked in a physical job and develops a musculoskeletal condition and needs treatment? Should they just be thrown on the scrap-heap or should their only recourse be legal action against all the employers they've ever had?Grey Day for Elcia said:Better yet, ditch healthcare systems all together. I really, really don't understand why we have them. You give the greedy assholes more money than you will ever use on healthcare, then some of it is used to help strangers who may or may not have caused their own problems. If people want to be in that sort of a system, let them. But in my country everyone pays for basic healthcare through taxes. That's bullshit.
Example: I attempted suicide and ended up in hospital for a month or so. Why should anyone else have to pay for my treatment? I made that choice. Same with smokers; someone smokes, knowing it'll fuck them, gets sick and then has everyone pay for their care.
Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.Bertylicious said:At the risk of being called an Obama-loving, hippy, fuck, don't you think that societies should look after people? I mean, what if you've got a person who has worked in a physical job and develops a musculoskeletal condition and needs treatment? Should they just be thrown on the scrap-heap or should their only recourse be legal action against all the employers they've ever had?Grey Day for Elcia said:Better yet, ditch healthcare systems all together. I really, really don't understand why we have them. You give the greedy assholes more money than you will ever use on healthcare, then some of it is used to help strangers who may or may not have caused their own problems. If people want to be in that sort of a system, let them. But in my country everyone pays for basic healthcare through taxes. That's bullshit.
Example: I attempted suicide and ended up in hospital for a month or so. Why should anyone else have to pay for my treatment? I made that choice. Same with smokers; someone smokes, knowing it'll fuck them, gets sick and then has everyone pay for their care.
I mean to say; if you don't have a society that has looking after people as a kind of categorical imperative, won't you just have a bitter land of recrimination that benefits nobody apart from lawyers?
OT: Discriminating against fat people is fine because they're fat. Like, you wouldn't let a massive, 40 stone, man onto a plane because he weighs 40 stone. It's not like you're not letting a person on to a plane because he's of low caste and might dishonour the other passengers.
Actually I'm quite happy about stopping poor people from living in grinding poverty. Still, I respect your position although I do believe it carries the drawback of making healthcare something only the wealthy elite can have. I think we may have fundamentally different views on what society is for, which might be a good laugh to explore.Grey Day for Elcia said:Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.
Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care is absurd. It'd be no different than if the government came out tomorrow and said they are increasing taxes to make everyone pay the bills for the poor.
Opt in and opt out healthcare? Great. Forcing hardworking people who never need healthcare to pay for some unhealthy bastard's hospital trip? Inane.
Denied? No. I think healthcare system should be opt in and out. If you want to pay the bills/tax, you and everyone else on the system can use the healthcare when you need it. If you don't want to pay the bills/tax, you can't use the system when you need it and must pay in full (as in 99% of cases, healthcare just pays for some of the bill, not all of it, anyay).Bertylicious said:Actually I'm quite happy about stopping poor people from living in grinding poverty. Still, I respect your position although I do believe it carries the drawback of making healthcare something only the wealthy elite can have. I think we may have fundamentally different views on what society is for, which might be a good laugh to explore.Grey Day for Elcia said:Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.
Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care is absurd. It'd be no different than if the government came out tomorrow and said they are increasing taxes to make everyone pay the bills for the poor.
Opt in and opt out healthcare? Great. Forcing hardworking people who never need healthcare to pay for some unhealthy bastard's hospital trip? Inane.
So, bringing us back to the original topic, you reckon fat people should be denied health-care, along with smokers and sad people?
Should fat people pay more? Also, what happens to poor people who haven't opted in when they get ill? Will the state lay on the cost of a sedative for them as they climb into a pit with all the other opt outs to be filled in with dirt or will it just be two stout lads with iron bars?Grey Day for Elcia said:Denied? No. I think healthcare system should be opt in and out. If you want to pay the bills/tax, you and everyone else on the system can use the healthcare when you need it. If you don't want to pay the bills/tax, you can't use the system when you need it and must pay in full (as in 99% of cases, healthcare just pays for some of the bill, not all of it, anyay).Bertylicious said:Actually I'm quite happy about stopping poor people from living in grinding poverty. Still, I respect your position although I do believe it carries the drawback of making healthcare something only the wealthy elite can have. I think we may have fundamentally different views on what society is for, which might be a good laugh to explore.Grey Day for Elcia said:Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.
Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care is absurd. It'd be no different than if the government came out tomorrow and said they are increasing taxes to make everyone pay the bills for the poor.
Opt in and opt out healthcare? Great. Forcing hardworking people who never need healthcare to pay for some unhealthy bastard's hospital trip? Inane.
So, bringing us back to the original topic, you reckon fat people should be denied health-care, along with smokers and sad people?
In most countries your health does dictate how much you pay for the service, with the older and less healthy you are, the more you pay in premiums. So yeah, this is already in affect. It's just a shame some countries (the one I live in, for one) force compulsory health tax. I'm fairly certain the majority (if not the vast majority) of countries do not use this form of unavoidable healthcare.Bertylicious said:Should fat people pay more? Also, what happens to poor people who haven't opted in when they get ill? Will the state lay on the cost of a sedative for them as they climb into a pit with all the other opt outs to be filled in with dirt or will it just be two stout lads with iron bars?Grey Day for Elcia said:Denied? No. I think healthcare system should be opt in and out. If you want to pay the bills/tax, you and everyone else on the system can use the healthcare when you need it. If you don't want to pay the bills/tax, you can't use the system when you need it and must pay in full (as in 99% of cases, healthcare just pays for some of the bill, not all of it, anyay).Bertylicious said:Actually I'm quite happy about stopping poor people from living in grinding poverty. Still, I respect your position although I do believe it carries the drawback of making healthcare something only the wealthy elite can have. I think we may have fundamentally different views on what society is for, which might be a good laugh to explore.Grey Day for Elcia said:Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.
Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care is absurd. It'd be no different than if the government came out tomorrow and said they are increasing taxes to make everyone pay the bills for the poor.
Opt in and opt out healthcare? Great. Forcing hardworking people who never need healthcare to pay for some unhealthy bastard's hospital trip? Inane.
So, bringing us back to the original topic, you reckon fat people should be denied health-care, along with smokers and sad people?
Maybe we should do the same with education? I mean, I don't plan on having any kids so maybe I shouldn't have to subsidise breeders?
Yep. The NHS (National Health Service) in the UK has an on-and-off scheme to buy gym membership for obese people in order to help them to lose weight. The argument has been that some people are "too poor" to be able to lose weight, as they can't pay for healthy food or expensive gym membership.Farseer Lolotea said:I actually agree with this. (People seriously do that?)MetalMagpie said:I don't have a problem with people carrying a bit of extra weight. I have a problem with people who think that being fat is a disability that they should get special benefits for.
Be fat if you like. I really couldn't care less. But stop demanding that the government pay for your gym membership. If I have to pay rip-off rates to take my un-special body to the gym, then I don't see why someone else should get it for free just because they weigh more than I do.
Note: Having a diagnosed medical problem that causes excessive weight gain is a disability. Just being fat is not.
Same deal with education; everyone has to pay for higher education, right? Wrong. Break the law, get sent to prison and they'll pay for it for you. Hell, if you want, they'll give you special tutors that teach you one-on-one. Poor? No degree. Criminal? Free bachelor of arts, lol.MetalMagpie said:Yep. The NHS (National Health Service) in the UK has an on-and-off scheme to buy gym membership for obese people in order to help them to lose weight. The argument has been that some people are "too poor" to be able to lose weight, as they can't pay for healthy food or expensive gym membership.Farseer Lolotea said:I actually agree with this. (People seriously do that?)MetalMagpie said:I don't have a problem with people carrying a bit of extra weight. I have a problem with people who think that being fat is a disability that they should get special benefits for.
Be fat if you like. I really couldn't care less. But stop demanding that the government pay for your gym membership. If I have to pay rip-off rates to take my un-special body to the gym, then I don't see why someone else should get it for free just because they weigh more than I do.
Note: Having a diagnosed medical problem that causes excessive weight gain is a disability. Just being fat is not.
Not only is this a colossal waste of money, it has led to (admittedly, a small minority) seeing the free gym membership is one of their human rights, and becoming outraged when the scheme is withdrawn from their area due to budget cuts.
I had to go for a very long walk to cool down after watching a woman on the news protesting that she was being "discriminated against" because (in her words), "If I had any other type of disability, the NHS would have to help me. But because I'm fat, they can cut off my support any time they like!"
Doesn't obesity kill more people than smoking? Pretty sure it does.Mau95 said:I dislike the idea of being fat and how accepted it is compared to smoking or drinking but it's nothing against fat people personally.
I was just reading your Diablo 3 piracy thread. Glad that you don't care about what I do with my life though.Grey Day for Elcia said:Doesn't obesity kill more people than smoking? Pretty sure it does.Mau95 said:I dislike the idea of being fat and how accepted it is compared to smoking or drinking but it's nothing against fat people personally.
Weird in that case how smoking is so reviled but being overweight is seen as normal.
Not that I give a shit what you wanna do with your life, lol.
Oh, that wasn't aimed at you. I mean I don't care if people want to be fat or to smoke or to take drugs. Not my life and not my body.Mau95 said:I was just reading your Diablo 3 piracy thread. Glad that you don't care about what I do with my life though.Grey Day for Elcia said:Doesn't obesity kill more people than smoking? Pretty sure it does.Mau95 said:I dislike the idea of being fat and how accepted it is compared to smoking or drinking but it's nothing against fat people personally.
Weird in that case how smoking is so reviled but being overweight is seen as normal.
Not that I give a shit what you wanna do with your life, lol.
Okay, solid.Grey Day for Elcia said:In most countries your health does dictate how much you pay for the service, with the older and less healthy you are, the more you pay in premiums. So yeah, this is already in affect. It's just a shame some countries (the one I live in, for one) force compulsory health tax. I'm fairly certain the majority (if not the vast majority) of countries do not use this form of unavoidable healthcare.Bertylicious said:Should fat people pay more? Also, what happens to poor people who haven't opted in when they get ill? Will the state lay on the cost of a sedative for them as they climb into a pit with all the other opt outs to be filled in with dirt or will it just be two stout lads with iron bars?Grey Day for Elcia said:Denied? No. I think healthcare system should be opt in and out. If you want to pay the bills/tax, you and everyone else on the system can use the healthcare when you need it. If you don't want to pay the bills/tax, you can't use the system when you need it and must pay in full (as in 99% of cases, healthcare just pays for some of the bill, not all of it, anyay).Bertylicious said:Actually I'm quite happy about stopping poor people from living in grinding poverty. Still, I respect your position although I do believe it carries the drawback of making healthcare something only the wealthy elite can have. I think we may have fundamentally different views on what society is for, which might be a good laugh to explore.Grey Day for Elcia said:Because you are forced to pay for charity. If you want to, then fine. Awesome. Go ahead. But to force everyone to pay for other people's issues is absurd. I don't want to pay for Joe Blog to have heart surgery because they ate themselves into a heart attack, or for Jane Smith to have a transplanted organ 'cause she ruined the last one on drugs and alcohol, or for Random Person #3 to get treated for cancer after smoking a pack a day for thirty years.
Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care is absurd. It'd be no different than if the government came out tomorrow and said they are increasing taxes to make everyone pay the bills for the poor.
Opt in and opt out healthcare? Great. Forcing hardworking people who never need healthcare to pay for some unhealthy bastard's hospital trip? Inane.
So, bringing us back to the original topic, you reckon fat people should be denied health-care, along with smokers and sad people?
Maybe we should do the same with education? I mean, I don't plan on having any kids so maybe I shouldn't have to subsidise breeders?
I don't know about education. It's a different issue and I'd have to look into it before commenting.