Pakistan Bans Facebook Over "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day"

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.
Yes, one religion should get to decide what is or isn't appropriate content for everyone. That makes sense.
Well I've already explained this once. I may as well do it again.

The page is needlessly offensive to Muslims, the whole thing could be handled much more maturely. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you shouldn't try to avoid insults, regardless of what the opposition does to you. The page just makes things worse, and if people decide to react like this the whole thing is never going to end. Even though I realise this kind of thing will probably never die down completely, it doesn't mean we can't at least attempt to resolve it.
I don't think the apparent rudeness is relevant to be honest. Thats not the issue. I do not believe that just because one religion thinks drawing someone is wrong that everyone must adhere to that. Besides, just because they could avoid insults does not mean they have to. The right to free speech and free expression means you can say and do anything you want even if someone's panties are gonna get in a twist. The internet is free for everyone to use and to see a country ban a site because is offends the majorities religion pisses me off.
Well, the whole thing is only relevant to Muslims really. No one would draw Mohammed unless they were being either A)Ignorant or B) a troll. If it was about eating pork then I might support it, because we eat pork anyway, not just to piss people off.
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.
Yes, one religion should get to decide what is or isn't appropriate content for everyone. That makes sense.
Well I've already explained this once. I may as well do it again.

The page is needlessly offensive to Muslims, the whole thing could be handled much more maturely. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you shouldn't try to avoid insults, regardless of what the opposition does to you. The page just makes things worse, and if people decide to react like this the whole thing is never going to end. Even though I realise this kind of thing will probably never die down completely, it doesn't mean we can't at least attempt to resolve it.
I don't think the apparent rudeness is relevant to be honest. Thats not the issue. I do not believe that just because one religion thinks drawing someone is wrong that everyone must adhere to that. Besides, just because they could avoid insults does not mean they have to. The right to free speech and free expression means you can say and do anything you want even if someone's panties are gonna get in a twist. The internet is free for everyone to use and to see a country ban a site because is offends the majorities religion pisses me off.
Well, the whole thing is only relevant to Muslims really. No one would draw Mohammed unless they were being either A)Ignorant or B) a troll. If it was about eating pork then I might support it, because we eat pork anyway, not just to piss people off.
The intent is again, a non issue. The fact is I don't want to be restricted by someone else's religion.
 

Burwood123

New member
Dec 2, 2009
246
0
0
I appreciate that, they have the right to ban a website over "provocative" and "Disrespectful" imaging, but what i don't get is why, in the early days of the religion, they well, 'encouraged' isnt the word, but there wasn't consequence for drawing mohammad, inface, many artists drew him, Source:
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Jonluw said:
Thing is though: You don't have to respect other people's beliefs. You don't have to respect other people at all.

You should respect other people, sure, it makes for a nicer place to live; but you don't have to respect them. Go ahead and disrespect whoever you like, then they can disrespect you back, and that's fine, but when they start killing people over not being respected, something went horribly wrong somewhere.
So americans don't kill people for being disrespected? People don't get stabbed outside of night clubs because someone tried to take their girlfriend? Don't shoot someone because they get cut off on the interstate? Things go horribly wrong all over the western world for lesser reasons. Just because most americans have a distinct lack of religion or respect for religion doesn't mean they should under estimate the importance of a belief like this to someone else.
Sane ones don't, no.

For the record, I am not an American.
 

evilartist

New member
Nov 9, 2009
471
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Respect people's beliefs, and you know what, they might actually start to respect yours.
Sorry if it seems like I'm singling you out, Akalabeth (I'm not, honestly), but that's a pretty naive statement. While you are right about that with most people and religions, radicals of any religion won't ever respect the views of others; they can't be reasoned with; they can't be convinced with logic.

I'm reminded of those "God Hates America" people, as well as the Christian Reconstructionists. They're indoctrinated beyond the point of reason, and they won't stop screaming until everyone in the world agrees with their narrow views.

I'm fine with mutual respect among religions, but do you really think radicals are going to respect first-world culture just by us doing the same first? I think that's ludicrous.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.
Yes, one religion should get to decide what is or isn't appropriate content for everyone. That makes sense.
Well I've already explained this once. I may as well do it again.

The page is needlessly offensive to Muslims, the whole thing could be handled much more maturely. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you shouldn't try to avoid insults, regardless of what the opposition does to you. The page just makes things worse, and if people decide to react like this the whole thing is never going to end. Even though I realise this kind of thing will probably never die down completely, it doesn't mean we can't at least attempt to resolve it.
I don't think the apparent rudeness is relevant to be honest. Thats not the issue. I do not believe that just because one religion thinks drawing someone is wrong that everyone must adhere to that. Besides, just because they could avoid insults does not mean they have to. The right to free speech and free expression means you can say and do anything you want even if someone's panties are gonna get in a twist. The internet is free for everyone to use and to see a country ban a site because is offends the majorities religion pisses me off.
Well, the whole thing is only relevant to Muslims really. No one would draw Mohammed unless they were being either A)Ignorant or B) a troll. If it was about eating pork then I might support it, because we eat pork anyway, not just to piss people off.
The intent is again, a non issue. The fact is I don't want to be restricted by someone else's religion.
Would not being able to draw Mohammed really affect you?
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Snip
So if someone says "you should hate jews" is that wrong in terms of free speech?
Now what about if someone says "spit in the face of muslim beliefs" is that wrong as well? And notice I said muslims, not muslim extremists.

Snip
No, I suppose neither of those would be wrong in terms of free speech. Of course, they're wrong in terms of common sense, but so long as you're not actively encouraging someone to do harm to someone, free speech will allow you to say it. The line might be a little blurry right here though, "You should hate jews" might be interpreted as an encouragement to actively persecute jews.
 

Moromillas

New member
May 25, 2010
328
0
0
....

What the hell....

You guys do realize Muslims are not a Borg collective, right?

Here's a bit more information on the whole South Park VS Muslim thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUhIuWETvdk

Furthermore, I would just like say, um, I think you guys are really cool? *slowly backs away from flame wars*
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Dark Templar said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.
Yes, one religion should get to decide what is or isn't appropriate content for everyone. That makes sense.
Well I've already explained this once. I may as well do it again.

The page is needlessly offensive to Muslims, the whole thing could be handled much more maturely. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you shouldn't try to avoid insults, regardless of what the opposition does to you. The page just makes things worse, and if people decide to react like this the whole thing is never going to end. Even though I realise this kind of thing will probably never die down completely, it doesn't mean we can't at least attempt to resolve it.
I don't think the apparent rudeness is relevant to be honest. Thats not the issue. I do not believe that just because one religion thinks drawing someone is wrong that everyone must adhere to that. Besides, just because they could avoid insults does not mean they have to. The right to free speech and free expression means you can say and do anything you want even if someone's panties are gonna get in a twist. The internet is free for everyone to use and to see a country ban a site because is offends the majorities religion pisses me off.
Well, the whole thing is only relevant to Muslims really. No one would draw Mohammed unless they were being either A)Ignorant or B) a troll. If it was about eating pork then I might support it, because we eat pork anyway, not just to piss people off.
The intent is again, a non issue. The fact is I don't want to be restricted by someone else's religion.
Would not being able to draw Mohammed really affect you?
Yes, it would stop me from drawing Mohammed.

Whats next? I can't eat pork? I can't learn evolution in school? I can't raise my kids the way I want to because someone else has a different religion than me?

Someone else's beliefs should not decide what I can and cannot do. The fact that drawing Mohammed isn't a big deal to me is irrelevant. Its the fact that because something offends Muslims its not ok for the rest of the country to see, thats bullshit.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
Snip
Would not being able to draw Mohammed really affect you?
To be fair there is probably noone here who would normally draw Mohammed if they were not told they couldn't. It's a question of principle after all. How would you feel if muslim extremists suddenly took offense at your eating pork, and started burning houses because you depicted a man eating pork in your local newspaper?
 

evilartist

New member
Nov 9, 2009
471
0
0
Akalabeth said:
The point is, that this draw mohammad day is quite frankly a stupid, ignorant idea that does nothing except foster hate and mistrust between the various religious and geographic groups. Considering America's actions in the middle east of late, that's hardly the sort of message the west should be sending. You spit in someone's face and then you can't understand why he's such a loony bin and wants to hurt you.

And as for pushing one's views onto others. The West is doing it all the time. Trying to get the middle east to adhere to western idealogies, whether it's at the end of a gun, or at the end of an internet connection. So if drawing mohammad is legally prohibited in Pakistan or wherever, they're fine banning facebook if facebook is being used as a vehicle to commit or promote law-breaking.
I'm just gonna skip most of your post and move on to these last two paragraphs, since we just keep wasting time going around in circles. I won't bother arguing with you anymore.

As a final thought, though, I address your last two paragraphs: you are again taking your anger out on me for the actions of the Bush Administration. Canadians, European nations, and others often think they should speak to me in generalizations like "This is all your guys' faults. You're the ones that pissed them off. You guys elected these incompetent leaders." I would like to state for the record that I had nothing to do the actions of our prior administration, nor did I vote for Bush Junior or Senior (I was too young during the '88 elections anyway), so quit bunching me in with them, because it seems to be negatively affecting your mindset when reading my posts.

I'm through dealing with you. Go ahead and show respect, and hope that the radicals will do the same. I'm just not holding my breath that they will.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Snip
So what's the definition of persecution?
Would a muslim view the mass depiction of mohammad as religious persecution? And would a facebook page promoting said depictions be likewise promoting religious persecution?
When I say persecution I mean actively doing harm to the group in question for the reason that they belong to that group. Like in the Holocaust.

Edit: Not necesarrily on that scale though.
Edit: Gaaah! Screwing up the quotes.
 

PsykoDragon

New member
Aug 19, 2008
413
0
0
Drawing Mohammed isn't even forbidden in the Qoran, it's just some tradition passed down by the clergy (probably to avert comical depictions of him), so Muslims shouldn't really complain. It's like when I'd say "cheers!" to my Muslim friends, when we're just drinking some coke. They'd respond with "Dude that's blasphemy!", & I'd say "It isn't, read your book bro"... They ignored me, then one day we're all drinking coke again & one of them goes "cheers!", & I'm like "wtf?!"

On the other hand, this Facebook group/event is obviously just to taunt Muslims (free speech my ass).

(I'm born in a Muslim family btw, am an atheist)
 

Cliff_m85

New member
Feb 6, 2009
2,581
0
0
chaos order said:
Cliff_m85 said:
chaos order said:
chunkeymonke said:
chaos order said:
i think that the page should not be censored(i feel a bad burning sensation inside), however i find that everyone on that page is being a little bit of a dick. thy are simply doing this in order to piss people off without discretion. they dont care if they insult normal muslims or extremists ,they just want to insult muslims in general.


on a side note: alot of people here rag on religion, saying it is obsolete and we have the miracle of science to explain how the world works. Although i do somewhat agree with you ( as a muslim im saying this with clenched teeth). But people fail to realize that religion has brought alot of science into the world. we wouldn't have astronomy or even biology without religion for that matter. Yes during the earlier ages these sciences were basic but religion set the ground work for people to try and understand the world and universe around them. i wouldnt go so far as to say without religion we wouldnt have science without religion but religion did help ALOT to help sciences start. YES religion has attempted to stop science (like with evolution) but i think of it as the student surpassing the teacher, the teacher doesn't like it too much.

Religion may have "caused" the death of millions over the ages but it wasn't the religion it self that caused the death it was people reinterpreting their faith in order to further their political or personal goals. I think i'd like to use the NRA's slogan with this (although i dont like them either) in that religion dont kill people, people kill people. science is relatively new compared to other religions so it hasnt gone through this bastardization that religion has gone through. i mean i can think of one example were science has been used to negatively catagorize others. during the enlightenment(the time being when science began to gain popularity as the main tool in explaining the world) jews were labeled as an inferior species rather than a religion and that their death or segregation from society will benefit humanity as a whole. this is the best example of how science can also be the cause of violence, and death towards people.

so yes science has replaced religion as the main tool for explaining the world and that religion should be kept in ones home and not in politics, but it has done great things as well, like spreading morality and ethics towards each other and it is the extremists or the irrationals that choose to ignore such teachings. SO religion DOES deserve respect in my opinion event to athiests, they should at least respect religion similiar to that of a museum piece that has benefited humanity more than being a detriment to it.
really? remember the dark ages? hundreds of years with literally no scientific advancements because of religion? sorry i dont mean to sound like a dick but religion has not helped science
yes im not going to deny the dark ages was a dark time for religion (see what i did there?) but as i said in my earlier post, biology and astronomy were pretty much started because of religion. When kepler calculated that the planets rotated in an ellipse rather than a circle he was driven by a religious feeling that he would be closer to god by knowing more about the universe. Now that is an example of how religion has helped science. without religion driving kepler we wouldnt have been able to go to the moon or send satelites into space.
No it's not. It's an example of a religious individual helping science. Newton, for instance, was tossed in jail for going against the Bible. Religion deserves no respect. It shows time and time again that actual fact-based research gets fought against due to bronze-age faith.

The dark ages was a wonderful time for religion, it was a purely religious time. For science, however, not at all. You know why religion tries to stop science. It's not because the 'student is exceeding the teacher'. It's because science points to one 'scary' thing....that the religious hokum in holy texts is....well....hokum.
no id have to dis agree i do believe my kepler example is an exmaple of religion helping science. kepler would not have coniniued his research based on the rotaion of planets if it wasnt for religion because he didnt like his old teacher tycho brye. and example where a religious person helping science would be newton, he was religious (i think) who developed his theories and calculations wihout inspiration from religion.

give science some time eventually ell see the same type of disputes with it as we see with religion. even south park(ironic) made an episode about it (the one where cartman goes into the future to get a wii and ends up in a future where one group of atheists are human, and the other are otters fight over which science is correct.

You say you have repsect for people but not for religion but when you insult religion you insult the way people grew up, you insult their upbringing, their belief system, and their values. Thats why religion deserves at least some respect in that religion has teaches us moral values and ethics from generation to the next. Yes religious leaders have used religion in violent manners, however it is those people who chose to ignore sections of their religion and reinterpret other parts in order to justify their cause. ITs not necassarily religion itself that is the problem its how people use it. SImilar to how science can be the cause of great destruction and great peace. science can create technologies that have helped us in our daily lives, and also created the atom bomb which killed millions.
The religious THREW NEWTON IN JAIL!!!! How exactly can you look at one individual and say "Well, he's religion. He helped science." and ignore the higher up majority that grabbed his ass and threw him behind bars?

Their belief system is stupid and their morals are inadequate. It deserves no respect. Faithful nonskepticism as well as sexist dribble don't deserve applause. I've read the Bible, I've also read the Quran. I know it's religion as well as nonskeptical people who are to blame.
 

Your once and future Fanboy

The Norwegian One
Feb 11, 2009
573
0
0
I'm so fucking sick and tired of all this religion crap, lets force it away from politics, out of government programs and into the private homes of the believers.
Religious income and buildings should also pay tax.

And if necessary I'm willing to go Holocaust on all the violent, religious people.
They will never change, never understand, and they will always want you dead for not believing in their god.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.

EDIT: Because of the many people who failed to understand, and thus responded aggresively, most notably this guy:
Kyuubi Fanatic said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
Well, the page is ignorant and retarded and personally, I think it should be removed. Idiots should not be tolerated.
Like yourself you mean? This great country is founded on freedom of speech, and I for one applaud those willing to speak out against those damn extremist, especially thru art.

I think I'll draw the "Mona Mohammed".
I'm going to expand.


The page is needlessly offensive to Muslims, the whole thing could be handled much more maturely. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you shouldn't try to avoid insults, regardless of what the opposition does to you. The page just makes things worse, and if people decide to react like this the whole thing is never going to end. Even though I realise this kind of thing will probably never die down completely, it doesn't mean we can't at least attempt to resolve it. It's not about fear of what extremists will do, it's about respecting other people's beliefs.
Yea because limiting freedom of speech is always a good idea, you know what if they don't want to see it they don't have to. Also if someone is alowed to fill a jar with piss, stick a crucifix in it and call it art, I think I can make a nice sketch of Mohammed leading a prayer or battle charge.