sisterblues said:
Try mutilation, horribly mutilated, in shreds. Try filling their vaginas up with oil and then setting you on fire. getting the picture yet little boy? There is NOTHING about rape that belongs in a game.
By my definitions, you've crossed from "just" rape, into torturing someone to death, and going on to mutilate the corpse. That's the most horrific thing that I can think of, short of perhaps involving families in this. And yet, should a game based on that be illegal? This is, perhaps, the last and greatest hurdle for the defenders of freedom of speech. Do you dare cross it?
Or, perhaps, should you worry that if you push too hard, it will prove elastic and propel you back down the slippery slope that you fear so much?
That said, there's a catch: no females were harmed in the making of this game, and there is (to my knowledge?) no causal link from playing these games to acting them out in the real world. Perhaps significantly, how many of the Darfur offenders played H games?
Rather, I suspect this has more to do with being raised in a social circle that promotes or accepts such viciousness.
On the other hand, does accepting vile games into society edge us in that direction? But then, moving from assaulting fictional characters to real is not an insignificant leap (for the sane mind)! (But I do not have this answer, and am suspicious of anyone claiming to know this answer.)
