So lets break down your argument: You never played FFX. You never owned a PS2. You'll gladly buy a $50-60 port but will not buy a $50 console. Because you will not buy a console you don't own, yet wish to play games on, all games for that console warrant a port. Anyone who criticizes the porting of the game just wants to deprive people of playing the game.Phlakes said:Hey, guys. You what some people who have a PS3 didn't have? A PS2. So unless you'd rather keep them from having the opportunity to play the game, don't criticize it for being a rehash/cash in.
It's not a full remake as far as anyone knows--just an HD upgrade with a few extra bells and whistles thrown in to celebrate its 10th anniversary.DarkSoldier84 said:This is the first I've heard of a Final Fantasy X remake. Seriously? The game's barely ten years old.
so he should buy a whole system for one game?Sylveria said:So lets break down your argument: You never played FFX. You never owned a PS2. You'll gladly buy a $50-60 port but will not buy a $50 console. Because you will not buy a console you don't own, yet wish to play games on, all games for that console warrant a port. Anyone who criticizes the porting of the game just wants to deprive people of playing the game.Phlakes said:Hey, guys. You what some people who have a PS3 didn't have? A PS2. So unless you'd rather keep them from having the opportunity to play the game, don't criticize it for being a rehash/cash in.
Ya know what, if people are stupid enough to shell out money for a port of a game cause they, for some reason, refuse to buy a last-gen platform that they actually want to play games on, you're right, I don't want them playing the game.
This isn't an HD remake of Earthbound or Secret of Mana, christ, this is a game you can get on Amazon, brand new, for $20 on a console you can get on Amazon, like-new, for $50. If it was confirmed, in any way, that it was an expanded version in any fashion except MAYBE a little more graphic shine, I'd drop most of my criticism, but that is still totally up in the air. But I guess 2005 PS2 graphics over 2002 PS2 graphics is worth $50+ with the the gaming audience these days having a bird-like response to shiny objects.
But hey, encourage this behavior, and next thing we know we'll all be lucky enough to be able to repurchase our entire game libraries every 10 years. That's way cheaper than buying an old console, right?
Are you aware of the GBA remake?Solo-Wing said:I liked FFX. But there are so many other Final Fantasies worthy of a remake. Like FF7. Square is just being thick when they would rather Remake X then VII. Or IX. Or VI....
[snip]
That was more of a Port then a actual remake.gyroc1 said:Are you aware of the GBA remake?Solo-Wing said:I liked FFX. But there are so many other Final Fantasies worthy of a remake. Like FF7. Square is just being thick when they would rather Remake X then VII. Or IX. Or VI....
[snip]
Unfair. Think about the logistics of FFX (I'm assuming you've played VII and X here). Think about the size of each segment of the map and how you see them. Now think about VII and the sheer SIZE of the game. More importantly think about the graphics we already have in X and compare it to VII.Solo-Wing said:I liked FFX. But there are so many other Final Fantasies worthy of a remake. Like FF7. Square is just being thick when they would rather Remake X then VII. Or IX. Or VI....
There would be nothing wrong with them making a FFVII remake. They would be giving the fans what they want and be going for a huge cash-grab. You know. Something EA and Activision always go for but get the flank for it. Square on the other hand would probably get away with this one.
I don't actually have a PS3, but it's the same principle, and yes, I'd rather get on PSN and download a port than order an entire console and game and have them shipped.Sylveria said:le snip