I tend to use Bulbisaur, but I just started a game of Leaf Green with Charmander for the first time. Let's see how it goes.
Arcanine was a (or really, only THE in Red/Blue) strong contender, but Charizard just had a much better movepool. Great stats on Arcanine though. Ninetales had one (albeit, useful) role as a debuffer and little else.crudus said:Arcanine actually gives Charizard a run for his money. Flareon beats both of them in attack and is found in both games. Ninetales isn't a bad substitute either.
Actually, I have played them. And it is because I played them I know they suck. Generation V was quite possibly the worst generation yet with hideous character designs, worse pokemon art, a story that defeats itself, and generally abysmal construction. Generation IV wasn't as bad, but it was still a distinct slip, showing the first precursors of the artists running out of good ideas for what anything should look like.creationis apostate said:You have never played them and believe that the first three were best because you played them as a kid. You haven't played the DS games have you, because gen 5>gen4,3,2,1BrailleOperatic said:Squirtle
Totodile
Treecko
Fuck That
Fuck That
Seriously, Fuck Gens IV and V. But seriously, I usually just pick the ones I think look the coolest.
All of the starters are severely outlassed when other options become available. Charizard is replaced by Moltres and Blastoise by Starmie or Lapras or one of the 50million other, better water types. Venusaur is, of course no exception, as Exeggutor is a grass type that has the coveted psychic subtype (and we all know how OP psychic was in gen 1).creationis apostate said:but by the end he's practically useless...