Uh, did you even read my post? I wasn't defending her being chosen as a VP candidate. I was defending the fact that she was already the Gov. of Alaska and she had gotten there based upon her merit. If you're just going to tl;dr, at least just post that before going off in a rant.historybuff said:Borrowed Time said:*snip*Labyrinth said:It's more the "woman in power" thing, which pisses me right off in this circumstance.Obtusifolius said:Good post.
Do people really think she's a feminist though? I'm British so I don't know as much about her as an American might.
Her own merit? What? What merit? McCain picked her because Obama was so wildly popular and he thought that by selecting an attractive woman, he'd appeal to more people by appearing progressive. It ended up being a huge mistake for him. So. What merit?
You getting all self-righteous about her just comes across as obnoxious. And then pulling the Hitler card? Really?
Secondly, self-righteous? How is defending someone's right to being acknowledged for their accomplishments being self-righteous? Are we speaking the same language here?
Thirdly, if you'd actually, once again, read the context in which I spoke about Hitler, you'd see that I was saying that even though he was a horrible person, he did in fact have some good ideas and helped Germany through a horrifically difficult time before he went apeshit bonkers with war. I was using him as a comparison of the fallacy of writing someone off because of blind rage for their beliefs or something that they've done. Just because Hitler was a madman doesn't mean that his strategic genius was any less potent during war, amiright?