Sexual Predators (mature topic)

[MirrorSweep]

Based on the OP, and without reading anyone's opinion I can say that I wouldn't hire Joe. Regardless of any other factors, I wouldn't hire anyone with a criminal record relating to those kinds of acts.

 

[Mcface]

The guy took advantage of a young kid to get his rocks off.

Or he had consensual sex with a 17 year old.
Or he didn't do anything at all but ended up in a rare and unfortunate situation resulting in a false conviction.

Or he raped a child.
Not a chance im willing to take.

 

[joshthor]

depends on if i had kids. but if not, sure. i'd keep him away from customers. but if he is good why not.

 

[Leg End]

Yes. Hired then and there. His past has no meaning as to whether or not he can fix what needs fixin. He served his time. Though, I'll look into the details later.

If a customer comes in and doesn't like it, then they can kindly get the hell out of my fucking store, because they are probably not going to be a very nice customer.

Everyone deserves a second chance. And, if it is a case of "Statutory Rape", then I have no ill, because that charge is bullshit.

Though, if I find out he had sex with say... a 7 year old girl, well... it had better been consensual, not full on rape.

If rape, I'm not going to like him much at first. But, if the alleged victim forgives him, no hard feelings in my book.

[sub]Many shall disagree with me. inb4 "what do you mean consensual?"[/sub]

 

[LawlessSquirrel]

I'd hire him. I may not agree with it, but by our current system, he's paid for his crimes. We have a habit of bringing in redundant punishment systems, but so long as the official one has been served, I'd be reluctant to take it upon myself to punish him more. Hell, if he's good for the job, he's worth hiring.

Knowing how touchy and (frankly) unjust the law can be some times, I'd give the guy the benefit of the doubt and give him a second chance. Even if it was a serious crime he committed, people can change. It's childish to think otherwise.

 

[v3n0mat3]

I'd hire him. If he's valuable as an employee, personal or private business does not belong in the workplace.

What he did was abhorrent, no question. But in a workplace, that's not important. I would need his work ethic, and he's reaching out to me as a human being. I'd forgive him for his crime, he needs help. Denying him assistance in a time of great need would be a terrible thing.

 

[Tron-tonian]

Too many holes that need to be filled in before I can say yes. If it was statutory rape, I hire him. If it was for going after little kids, he leaves before I kick his teeth in because studies show that real pedo's are unlikely to change.

Fun stuff to know - in some jurisdictions, getting busted urinating in public can earn you a spot on a sex offender registry.

 

[kypsilon]

I hire him with the intention of leaving him in a room in the back that is fully under surveillance. He may not have done what he was accused of, but I'm not going to give him an opportunity to demonstrate such behavior again, at least while he is at work.

 

[Sovereignty]

No. But I wouldn't hire a shop lifter over a person who's committed no crimes. That's why they have parole officers who help them get jobs and government benefits for companies that hire them.

 

[blue.blink]

In this instance you have to assume he did it. If that is so you should not hire him. There are plenty of jobs where he wouldn't be around children/adolescents. If he really cant find a job nearby he has to move then, that's the price he would pay for molesting.

 

[Leg End]

In this instance you have to assume he did it. If that is so you should not hire him. There are plenty of jobs where he wouldn't be around children/adolescents. If he really cant find a job nearby he has to move then, that's the price he would pay for molesting.

Yet, that is a form of prolonged punishment.

It's like having a sign over your head saying "Hey, I did something that I regret and want a second chance but you think I deserve to be forever punished, kick me in the gonads".

 

[Leg End]

Too many holes that need to be filled in before I can say yes. If it was statutory rape, I hire him. If it was for going after little kids, he leaves before I kick his teeth in because studies show that real pedo's are unlikely to change.

Fun stuff to know - in some jurisdictions, getting busted urinating in public can earn you a spot on a sex offender registry.

Studies also show only 5-15% of child molesters are Pedophiles and that only 2-7% of Pedophiles molest children.

Although, more studies are needed because that percentage shoots all over the place.

 

[Asuka Soryu]

I'd hire him. I'm looking for a worker, not trying to clean up the world. Besides, who knows if he was aressted under false charges? You know nothing about him, if he's a good worker fine. Giving him a job won't change him from being a sexual predator if he truely is one.


But hey, think of it like this. Wouldn't you rather he spends his free time working then on other things? Incase he really is a sexual predator/not reformed.


And everyone deserves a second chance. He served his time.

 

[theevilsanta]

Weird question. I'd hire him. My business is not related to that man's problems with sex and jail. I suppose I'd consider if he'd be a liability to my business having a poor reputation or if he might go back to jail again and leave me employeeless.

 

[Danish rage]

As a parent: No
As a person: No
As a person that would probably bash his head in first chance i get: Come on in, what´s you´re kvalifikations, and do you wanna see my basement?

Bottomline is. No, redemption is not my thing, and not for me to give other than to my children.

 

[Sindaine]

They wouldn't call them 'predators' if they didn't.

That's the biggest fallacy in the world.

There are numerous reasons why people would call them predators.
The obvious one being that people think that they stalk the streets looking for children, and so call them by the name they assume they fit.

Another reason is that they are predators, but there is more than one way to pray on a child. A far more common one being to find a child you have constant access to and groom them. Very much a predatory action, but doesn't in anyway involve stalking the streets.

I've been a victim of one of these monsters myself and I will do anything and everything in my power to prevent other children going through that.

Okay, so why are you giving the him money he needs to fly to Asia and rape child prostitutes over there?

Either way, he is being predatory and a danger to children. And get real; the sick fuck won't be able to afford a flight to Asia on minimum wage.

 

[Leg End]

They wouldn't call them 'predators' if they didn't.

That's the biggest fallacy in the world.

There are numerous reasons why people would call them predators.
The obvious one being that people think that they stalk the streets looking for children, and so call them by the name they assume they fit.

Another reason is that they are predators, but there is more than one way to pray on a child. A far more common one being to find a child you have constant access to and groom them. Very much a predatory action, but doesn't in anyway involve stalking the streets.

I've been a victim of one of these monsters myself and I will do anything and everything in my power to prevent other children going through that.

Okay, so why are you giving the him money he needs to fly to Asia and rape child prostitutes over there?

Either way, he is being predatory and a danger to children. And get real; the sick fuck won't be able to afford a flight to Asia on minimum wage.

Actually, the "sick fuck" in question could afford it in about 3 months if he properly manages his money right.

I don't know why the hell I felt the need to point that out.

 

[Leg End]

Yes. Hired then and there. His past has no meaning as to whether or not he can fix what needs fixin. He served his time. Though, I'll look into the details later.

If a customer comes in and doesn't like it, then they can kindly get the hell out of my fucking store, because they are probably not going to be a very nice customer.

Everyone deserves a second chance. And, if it is a case of "Statutory Rape", then I have no ill, because that charge is bullshit.

Though, if I find out he had sex with say... a 7 year old girl, well... it had better been consensual, not full on rape.

If rape, I'm not going to like him much at first. But, if the alleged victim forgives him, no hard feelings in my book.

[sub]Many shall disagree with me. inb4 "what do you mean consensual?"[/sub]

Did I read this right? Are you saying an adult sleeping with a 7-year-old is okay if it's consensual?

Well, it's personal opinion but if said person did it with said child consensually and the child did not feel scarred or abused/used later in life and it was consensual at the time, the law might frown upon it but I have no issue with them.

i.e, no harm no foul. But I do not condone molestation. The people that manipulate children or outright abuse them like that have no support from me.

[sub]This might not be the best place to talk about this.[/sub]

 

[blankedboy]

I'd hire him if I felt he deserved it. My morals say that deserving people deserve, undeserving people don't. So I'll give him what he deserves.

 

[Leg End]

I'd hire him if I felt he deserved it. My morals say that deserving people deserve, undeserving people don't. So I'll give him what he deserves.

The latter part can easily be manipulated to sound like you'll murder him if he deserves it.

But, point taken.