So! Avengers: Endgame

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,176
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Saw it today. 3 hours of my life wasted. It's now my new least favourite MCU film.

I really can't be bothered to go into detail (not yet at least, maybe in the movies thread), but the film's plot makes absolutely no sense due to its time travel mechanics, and it's dull, plodding, and above all, boring.

Course none of that matters, but gah.
 

bluegate

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2010
2,411
1,021
118
Hawki said:
Saw it today. 3 hours of my life wasted. It's now my new least favourite MCU film.

I really can't be bothered to go into detail (not yet at least, maybe in the movies thread), but the film's plot makes absolutely no sense due to its time travel mechanics, and it's dull, plodding, and above all, boring.

Course none of that matters, but gah.
If you're the kind of person that gets their knickers in a twist about time travel in media;

Do yourself a favor and don't overthink time travel in media, just take it at face value and enjoy whatever is being shown.

Time travel isn't real so basically any writer can think up whatever rules they like, no point in trying to make sense out of things with your own throught up rules.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,176
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
bluegate said:
If you're the kind of person that gets their knickers in a twist about time travel in media;

Do yourself a favor and don't overthink time travel in media, just take it at face value and enjoy whatever is being shown.

Time travel isn't real so basically any writer can think up whatever rules they like, no point in trying to make sense out of things with your own throught up rules.
Usually I'm not, but when the film makes a big deal about the rules of time travel, and then disregards those rules as the plot demands, it's hard not to notice.

When the film takes potshots at better films that used time travel as a plot point, I'm left to say that people in tesseracts shouldn't throw infinity stones.
 

Here Comes Tomorrow

New member
Jan 7, 2009
645
0
0
Hawki said:
bluegate said:
If you're the kind of person that gets their knickers in a twist about time travel in media;

Do yourself a favor and don't overthink time travel in media, just take it at face value and enjoy whatever is being shown.

Time travel isn't real so basically any writer can think up whatever rules they like, no point in trying to make sense out of things with your own throught up rules.
Usually I'm not, but when the film makes a big deal about the rules of time travel, and then disregards those rules as the plot demands, it's hard not to notice.

When the film takes potshots at better films that used time travel as a plot point, I'm left to say that people in tesseracts shouldn't throw infinity stones.
Assuming you're refering to Cap the Russo's have said Cap lived out his life with Peggy in an alternate timeline then jumped back into the main timeline by himself.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,749
5,067
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
trunkage said:
This comment is under the proviso that we don't know what's happening in the future with these movies.... I would gather that Captain Marvel has been winning battle all over the place. This was her being taken down a peg. So, in effect, she was like a stinger we normally see at the end of the movie, but actually in the middle of the battle. I do hope that this gives her reason to reconsider her negligence of Earth (hence the proviso)

But then, why were most of the characters in the movie? Spiderman and Black Panther pushed the football down the road, and they were out. Strange teleported everyone and held back some water. So he was a glorified taxi service. Also, why not teleport the water away. I cant remember most of the Guardians doing anything substantial. Falcon flew a bit and Bucky shot his gun.

If you're asking why Captain Marvel was in the movie, it makes as much sense as any character.
Many of those appearances like Black Panther?s, Spider-Man?s and Dr. Strange?s were largely ostentation, ?looky-here, all heroes on screen,? validation that they were indeed back from the dust; there was no impression given that any one of them was there to make the pivotal difference, but were there for the campy ?winning together? denouement. Captain Marvel, on the other hand, was there from the beginning of the film asserting herself as the alpha who pretty much tells us that our Earthly problems are just that, and but a drop in the cosmic bucket. Then she disappears only to come back during the epic final battle where she brings the melee to a grinding halt as everyone stares slack-jawed as she single-handedly brings downs Thanos? ship. She WAS fed to us as the pivotal linchpin for the allies? success in the face of insurmountable odds? then she got slapped around and tossed into a boulder.

I?m not saying she shouldn?t have been in the movie, I?m just saying they oversold her throughout for her to do as little as she did. I think instead of engaging Thanos, maybe she should have taken on more of the thousands of fodder he brought with him, thin their numbers in grand spectacle, bring down all of those huge flying Gears of War-looking thingies, etc.; we should have seen more of her unbridled power and less of her dissonantly struggling in hand-to-hand combat with the antagonist, use the excuse that she didn?t want to hurt the protagonists near him or something, I dunno, anything better than how they ultimately used her in that scene.
 

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
2,123
991
118
I saw Endgame yesterday evening. Here's my review. As a little challenge to myself I'll be trying to go the entire review without once mentioning Zack Snyder or any movie he directed.

I have major issues with Disney as a company and the Marvel Cinematic Universe as a franchise, I think the former needs to be split up and the latter needs to end. Having gotten this out of the way I hope you all believe me I tell you that I enjoyed Avengers Endgame quite a lot. I approached its predecessor Infinity War, in retrospect, perhaps not with the good will I usually make a point of approaching movies with. Something about it rubbed me the wrong way. There was certainly an ambition there to create a sort of superhero epic, something comparable to genre giants like Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, to a lesser extent even Harry Potter, I suppose, but Infinity War went about it in a way that struck me as insincere. The writing of movies like Star Wars or Lord of the Rings derives its gravitas from drawing clear parallels to ancient and biblical myths and for me a long time that was part of what defined the cinematic epic for me. Infinity War surely had a comparable sense of scale and scope to it but as far as I was concerned, the pathos just wasn't there. Maybe it was the dialogue. Where the characters of Lord of the Rings and Star Wars occasionally share dialogue that has a clear theatric, shakesperian bend to it, Marvel's costumed heroes tend to talk like sarcastic millenial hipsters. It's a world of cutting one-liners, snappy comebacks and snarky observations and always struck me as a bit insecure. A method to keep plausible deniability, to lean deeply into operatic, effects driven grandiosity and, when accused of pretention, still be able to say "What? It's just a light hearted action comedy, lighten up." There have been attempts by... other directors to commit fully to the operatic grandiosity of the genre without taking refuge in self aware humor, but the MCU has stuck confidently to its established tone which is why its more emotional moments fell flat to me. In retrospect though, I will say, I was probably too harsh on what was a mostly well constructed, occasionally creative superhero opera that, general consensus tells us, didn't fail to create the emotional response with its core audience that it didn't get from me.

So here we are, one year later, with Endgame, the second half to the Infinity duology and the conclusion to a story arc that lasted just slightly over a decade. And there's some credit to be given here, between Iron Man in 2008 and Endgame in 2019 we saw the end of the Harry Potter series, the beginning and end of the Twilight series, the beginning and end of the Hunger Games series, the beginning and end of the Hobbit series and the rise and fall of countless other franchises. The MCU, however, persisted, and maybe Endgame was as inevitable as its antagonist Thanos claims to be. And while I would have taken some pleasure in tearing it apart, in taking it down, to take petty revenge on a bloated blockbuster my commitment to sincere criticism says that I can't. Because Endgame is, even for me as a non-fan of the MCU, a good movie.

I think what makes Endgame work is that it knew that most of its major plotpoints where fairly predictable and then went out of its way to execute them in unexpected ways. We start off right where Infinity War left off, Thanos purged half of the universes population and our heroes have to cope with their own failure. The movie throws its first curveball here, Thanos is found and killed very early on, but the Infinity Stones are destroyed, half of the human population is still gone. There's a timeskip of five years and, in what is one of the movies smarter thematic ideas, the Avengers have become the equivalent of washed up celebrities. Tony Stark has retired in dignity to be a father to his daughter, Captain America joined a self help group, the Hulk takes photos with fans (And, one has to assume, probably also does conventions) and Thor, god bless Chris Hemsworth, has gone full washed up rockstar with pot belly, Z.Z. Top beard and a drinking problem. Endgame is for better or for worse, quite ready to let its main cast wallow in depression for a while, which puts it in contrast with Infinity War, which always seemed in a hurry to get from one action setpiece to the next.
As most have predicted the movie involves time travel to recover the Infinity Stones from the past. This leads to all the personal character moments, fan servicey action scenes and obligatory cameos one would expect. Though it is very impressive to see the movie pull the likes of Natalie Portman, John Favreau and, of all people, Robert Redford out of its hat. Once again there are some, mostly well executed, twists here that I'd rather not spoil but I will say that I rather enjoyed the whole second act of the movie. It was set up a lot like a heist movie through time and space, somewhat reminiscent of Inception only less complicated, less pretentious and better directed. Chances are there are lot of plotholes here for pedantic YouTube hacks like MauLer to pick apart but I had very little problems with the whole time travel sequence as an excuse for what are mostly well executed setpieces to happen.
Where the movie stumbles a little is in its last act, where the climactic battle against Thanos from the past happens. Once again the limitations of CGI are very clearly on display, character development is put on hold in favor of action and the movie seems to be going through the motions for a bit. It's competent enough but it failed to surprise, which the movie, to its credit, managed to do beforehand. It does come together again once its over and the movie is heading towards its conclusion, and I felt that it did end on a high note.

Though having quite a bit of praise for the movie, there's also some criticism. The movie sidelines a lot of the franchises newer characters to focus on its old guard one last time and as a matter of fact contrives a reason very early on to get them out of the way for most of the movie. Among them Captain Marvel. Having not seen her standalone movie I can't help but wonder what everyone's issue with her was again, as far as I can tell she's basically Superman, but as a cute blonde, which I have absolutely no issue with. Though talking about her, Endgame sure does very little to make the MCU any less of an unapologetic sausagefest, making a shot during the last battle showing a lineup of the MCU Waifu Unit in battle feel a bit hollow. I have already mentioned when talking about Infinity War that Tony Stark's character isn't nearly as charming in a post Elon Musk world as he was back in 2008 and that moving on is probably not a bad idea. Thanos is another character who gets the short end of the stick to focus on the core Avengers lineup more, which is unfortunate, because Josh Brolin's performance is once again very strong.

Overall though, I consider Endgame a success and considering how much enjoyment I got out of it, having not a lot of emotional investment in the MCU I am quite confident that fans will be very satisfied and, who knows, maybe get a bit teary eyed over it. I am very well aware that this movie is to normal people what Twin Peaks: The Return was for me and I genuinely hope it won't dissapoint them either. Make no mistake, Endgame is still an overproduced, overly long, lumbering monster of a movie but I can't bring myself to dislike it. For a spoiler, I think the moment that really tied the movie together for me was its very last scene. It shows Steve Rogers using the time machine one last time to return to the time he came from and reunite with his wife to live out the rest of his life with her. It was a very heartfelt little scene and the moment where I did realize that whoever wrote it and decided that it should end the movie has a strong grasp on theme. It ends with a literal World War 2 veteran returning home to the woman he loves. And all my cynicism towards Marvel, Disney and Hollywood in general aside, that was a beautiful note to end the movie on.
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
30,299
12,565
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Hawki said:
Saw it today. 3 hours of my life wasted. It's now my new least favourite MCU film.

I really can't be bothered to go into detail (not yet at least, maybe in the movies thread), but the film's plot makes absolutely no sense due to its time travel mechanics, and it's dull, plodding, and above all, boring.

Course none of that matters, but gah.
Hm, never felt boring to me. Everybody's different and there is nothing wrong with your opinion. I'd say biggest waste of 3 hours of life is Revenge of the Fallen and Titanic for me. Before anyone starts, the latter is not up for debate.
 

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
2,123
991
118
CoCage said:
Hawki said:
Saw it today. 3 hours of my life wasted. It's now my new least favourite MCU film.

I really can't be bothered to go into detail (not yet at least, maybe in the movies thread), but the film's plot makes absolutely no sense due to its time travel mechanics, and it's dull, plodding, and above all, boring.

Course none of that matters, but gah.
Hm, never felt boring to me. Everybody's different and there is nothing wrong with your opinion. I'd say biggest waste of 3 hours of life is Revenge of the Fallen and Titanic for me. Before anyone starts, the latter is not up for debate.
Is the former up for debate?
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
30,299
12,565
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
PsychedelicDiamond said:
CoCage said:
Hawki said:
Saw it today. 3 hours of my life wasted. It's now my new least favourite MCU film.

I really can't be bothered to go into detail (not yet at least, maybe in the movies thread), but the film's plot makes absolutely no sense due to its time travel mechanics, and it's dull, plodding, and above all, boring.

Course none of that matters, but gah.
Hm, never felt boring to me. Everybody's different and there is nothing wrong with your opinion. I'd say biggest waste of 3 hours of life is Revenge of the Fallen and Titanic for me. Before anyone starts, the latter is not up for debate.
Is the former up for debate?
Yes.
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,462
0
0
https://www.escapistmagazine.com/v2/2019/04/29/avengers-no-really-now-what/
 
Feb 26, 2014
668
0
0
The cause of all of this is the exchange between Banner and the Ancient One. The two seemed to establish that 1. Taking a stone from the past (And only by taking the stones) creates an alternate timeline where that stone does not exist and is thus doomed and 2. Returning the stones will erase that timeline. Which is weird because the time shenanigans were definitely setting up something, like Loki's new series on Disney+. I don't know if it was something they forgot to remove or if the intention was for Banner to just be wrong, but it's understandable that viewers would be annoyed when a rule is established and then tossed away. It didn't bother me at all, because I'd already been introduced to multiverse theory,

Aside from that, I loved it. I loved the downer start, Thor was fun and I hope to see some great cosplay as him in the future, act 2 was fun and heartwarming act 3 was exciting and almost made me cry. This 22 movie long behemoth of a saga has been pretty great overall and, since I have yet to suffer from fatigue, I'm looking forward to what they have planned for phase 4.
 

bluegate

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2010
2,411
1,021
118
There were lots of Nebula scenes, so I'm a happy camper 👍🙃
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,343
5,157
118
undeadsuitor said:
Captain marvel had the same screen time as okoye. Did her actress do something to piss off fanboys too?

Let's be real here. She's in the movie about as much as the other characters that show up in big character pieces, and her powers limit her from helping in anything less than a war. She really would have been a poor choice for the middle of the movie.

Endgame was about Tony, Steve and Thor. Everything else was window dressing
Yeah, but then why not just introduce her in Endgame? What's the point in making this seemingly important movie before Endgame gets released, introducing us to this new seemingly important character who will play a seemingly significant role in Endgame when she only shows up for two scenes to smash some things? Captain Marvel in Endgame reminds me of how Rumlow was teased to return at the end of Winter Soldier only to die at the start of Civil War, or the end credits scene in Winter Soldier introducing us to a new villain, only for him to die at the start of Age of Ultron.

So anyway, yeah, Endgame was a bit of a flaccid experience. The whole time travel crap really kneecapped this movie, meandering in nostalgia for movies that are barely a decade old. It's the perfect example of why you need to be very careful when writing time travel plotlines, otherwise you end up with shit like this.

I liked the start, and I wish they would've just build ontop of that. Introduce a few new secondary characters, and actually make Captain Marvel part of the plot. Speaking of her, in the final big battle when all the ladies gather together to charge it was kinda hilarious to see Mantis charge along with them. Like, she's a charming character and all, but what the hell is she gonna do in the thick of it?

Overall it was just sloppy with maybe a couple of neat moments. I wasn't even that big a fan of Infinity War, but by comparison Endgame makes it look positively outstanding. A silver lining though seems to be that Far From Home is using the fall-out to do some cool shit.
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,462
0
0
CyanCat47 said:
Marik2 said:
Infinity War > Age of Ultron > Endgame > Avengers
Didn't know there were other people who liked Age of Ultron more than Avengers 1.
Endgame reminded me so much of when I first saw Avengers in a packed crowd. The majority of people were yawning and on their phones, until the ending. Ultron had good pacing and it was nice to see other countries get blown up rather than murica for a change.
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,617
392
88
Finland
Casual Shinji said:
Speaking of her, in the final big battle when all the ladies gather together to charge it was kinda hilarious to see Mantis charge along with them. Like, she's a charming character and all, but what the hell is she gonna do in the thick of it?
I rarely use the word 'cringe', but that shot was cringe. To me there's another problem: Pepper. She's not a heroine at all, she flies in a magical exosuit superweapon that is controlled by an AI. Yes, she was badass with the extremis.exe installed but that was years ago already. The same with Spider-Man though maybe only 50% because his suit doesn't fly. And the new trailer? Freakin' Zeke Gyggendahl and Zendaya's ""MJ"" can go screw it.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,176
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Marik2 said:
Infinity War > Age of Ultron > Endgame > Avengers
Infinity War>Avengers>Age of Ultron>Endgame

Or, if you want it in a wider context:

17) The Avengers: Endgame

16) Iron Man 2

15) Thor

14) Captain America: The First Avenger

13) The Avengers: Age of Ultron

12) The Avengers

11) The Avengers: Infinity War

10) Captain Marvel

9) Captain America: Civil War

8) Guardians of the Galaxy

7) Thor: Ragnarok

6) Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 2

5) Iron Man

4) Iron Man 3

3) Doctor Strange

2) Ant-Man and the Wasp

1) Spider-Man: Homecoming