Actually, I disagree. I think Mr. Goldman is being sarcastic. But only he knows for sure.Internet Kraken said:That post was made in a completley different thread about a completley different comment. You are assuming just because somebody had been sarcastic before means that they are being sarcastic here as well. I disagree, as I see nothing to indicate that he was being sarcastic. His stance seems clear; so long as his personal information is not stolen and used, he will accept Sony's apology. A reasonable position, even if I don't agree with it.JDKJ said:My bad. Here's the post I had in mind:
Which may not clearly prove the case in point but does tend to prove the general proposition that not everything Mr. Goldman says should be taken at face value.Tom Goldman said:I was being a little sarcastic, considering that a free videogame does not compare to having one's identity stolen. Sorry if it didn't read.RelexCryo said:This particular line bothers me. Does this mean that if I offer you a free copy of Brink, you will give me your info?Tom Goldman said:For me personally, the badness level of having my identity stolen versus the goodness level of getting a videogame I want for free is a toss up,
Permalink
And since the tangential point is debatable, I believe the larger point still looms: the coverage here of the Sony kerfuffle hasn't been at all sympathetic to Sony. And has reported unsubstantiated allegations as facts (or, at least, hasn't done much to dissuade the reader from taking them as substantiated fact), and has engaged in hyperbole and exaggeration. I think all those things are reasonable accusations and ones clearly supported by the black 'n' white.