Look, dude. I don't think your going to win that. Drugs will never be a final best solution. It is a shitty blanket cover to make things alright for right now. But down the line will be nothing but destruction
Good point.Steampunk muffin said:So, what if the person is deathly allergic to marijuana? I'm just a bit curious as to what would happen then.riskroWe said:The punishment for 'taking yourself too seriously' would be a compulsory session of marijuana usage.
Relax, I'm not one of you.Nwabudike Morgan said:Shit like this makes me embarrassed to get high.
NOT ALL STONERS ARE MORONS LIKE THIS
People wouldn't support the overthrowing of a dictator who isn't oppressive unless they have something to gain. Malevolent didctators aren't stupid. They place themselves and there supporters right where they need to be. They smile and do all the right things and everyone loves them. THEN...riskroWe said:Nobody will support someone trying to overthrow a dictator who isn't oppressive. The people are already free to do anything they want. The idea is: anyone who has a problem with the freedom of other people is doped until they shut the hell up. lolThe other question you need to ask is what happens if someone who isn't your benevilant junkie overthrows said junkie and takes over?
LOLOLOL!!Kuchinawa212 said:Not in a dictatorship. You ignore that fact that for it to run properly they can be no problems. everything is getting everything equally. And what is equal is up to teh idiot in charge.riskroWe said:They can take drugs if they want to, but if it affects their performance at work then they either stop taking them or they lose their job.
It's really very simple...
The 'system' isn't run by the dictator. He's far too lazy to stick his nose into complex economic issues. The 'system' is a free market economy, run by nobody other than the people who participate in it.If there is a large blow to food and manual labor then he can't ignore it, the systems falls upon it's self
Dude.... No..no on so many levels. My idea of perfect society is not that at all. That's a dictatorship's goal for society. And what's wrong with being equal. So circle back to what you said earlier. Is it wrong the Jewish are equal to everyone else? To you it is. Since Equality isriskroWe said:LOLOLOL!!Kuchinawa212 said:Not in a dictatorship. You ignore that fact that for it to run properly they can be no problems. everything is getting everything equally. And what is equal is up to teh idiot in charge.riskroWe said:They can take drugs if they want to, but if it affects their performance at work then they either stop taking them or they lose their job.
It's really very simple...
That's your twisted idea of a utopian society. I reject equality, vehemently. Equality is disgusting and unnatural.
The 'system' isn't run by the dictator. He's far too lazy to stick his nose into complex economic issues. The 'system' is a free market economy, run by nobody other than the people who participate in it.If there is a large blow to food and manual labor then he can't ignore it, the systems falls upon it's self
and for your next point. In a dictatorship that dictator MUST. MUST. MUST run it. It's all based on what he does. and if he does nothing then everything goes to shit in a week.disgusting and unnatural
Ahhh I see now. The style of government you're referring to is called anarchy. Your leader is not a dictator who as the name suggests directs and dictates his will but rather an anarchist. Who effectively is a head of state but rather in ideal alone. There is no real government authority as authority is directed by the people based around the ideals of the figure head. This should not be confused with socialism which actually has a celtral government.riskroWe said:LOLOLOL!!Kuchinawa212 said:Not in a dictatorship. You ignore that fact that for it to run properly they can be no problems. everything is getting everything equally. And what is equal is up to teh idiot in charge.riskroWe said:They can take drugs if they want to, but if it affects their performance at work then they either stop taking them or they lose their job.
It's really very simple...
That's your twisted idea of a utopian society. I reject equality, vehemently. Equality is disgusting and unnatural.
The 'system' isn't run by the dictator. He's far too lazy to stick his nose into complex economic issues. The 'system' is a free market economy, run by nobody other than the people who participate in it.If there is a large blow to food and manual labor then he can't ignore it, the systems falls upon it's self
Pretty much.Suiseiseki IRL said:It would not end very well.
Like so many threads that say they can solve world problems with half baked solutions.
I'm not saying that chilling out fixes problems, I'm saying that concern as a reaction to problems is the cause of most of the other problems.stinkychops said:Next you'll be saying I can clean the carpet by getting so blind drunk I don't see the mess.
Or that you can reduce crime by making it legal.
Or you can put out a fire by everyone not looking at it.
True. Can you think of another way to calm people down? 'Cuz that's the point of it. If listening to Enya and doing some yoga does the trick, that'll work too.Smoking pot may seem 'cool' and is usually a relaxant but it is proven to increase probability of developing schizophrenia.
Splendid! Private industries who strive for efficiency and customer satisfaction will deliver much better services!You'd find a man with no-one to answer to will not do any work and then privitisation of government organisations (healthcare, police, water etc) would occur,
Wait wut?and then the number of private militaries and extremist groups would increase as they go unheard.
This government only has one law, one doctrine, one mantra, one directive to divert all their resources to enforcing - Chill out.Dwarfman said:People wouldn't support the overthrowing of a dictator who isn't oppressive unless they have something to gain. Malevolent didctators aren't stupid. They place themselves and there supporters right where they need to be. They smile and do all the right things and everyone loves them. THEN...
The difference is that here they are genuinely free to do as they wish. The freethinkers would never be silenced, as long as they weren't particularly aggressive or violent.The interesting thing about 1984, Blake's7 and movies like Equalibrium is that the dictator seems benevolent. The average citizen loves them and they are apparently free to do as they wish. The only spanner in the works are these strange free thinking terrorists who wish to destroy everyone's peace and harmony.
I have no problems with that... JKJRCB said:It would work terribly. Next thing you know, prostitution becomes legal, and the entire world gets renamed Amsterdam.
But there is organisation - the state still exists, people still pay taxes, the police still enforce the laws, it still organises all that crap that people go on about.Dwarfman said:Ahhh I see now. The style of government you're referring to is called anarchy. Your leader is not a dictator who as the name suggests directs and dictates his will but rather an anarchist. Who effectively is a head of state but rather in ideal alone. There is no real government authority as authority is directed by the people based around the ideals of the figure head. This should not be confused with socialism which actually has a celtral government.
In theory it's not such a bad idea, but flimsy and full of holes. The real problem is organisation. This was discovered in the Spanish civil war prior to WWII. The anarchists due to their natural state of being were decimated by Franco and his fascist allys
But the Jewish aren't equal to everyone else. The main difference, that which separates them from everyone else, is that they practice Judaism. :SKuchinawa212 said:And what's wrong with being equal. So circle back to what you said earlier. Is it wrong the Jewish are equal to everyone else? To you it is. Since Equality isdisgusting and unnatural
He is running it. He runs it by making sure everybody is calmly going about their business.and for your next point. In a dictatorship that dictator MUST. MUST. MUST run it. It's all based on what he does. and if he does nothing then everything goes to shit in a week.
Wait just a fucking minute. Those who don't take drugs will succeed more than those who do... but you're advocating putting a pothead in charge of everything? That is so many colors of wrong I don't even know where to begin.riskroWe said:I agree with you. Don't take drugs and I'm sure you'll succeed in life much more than the potheads and the alcoholics. I'm being 100% sincere.effilctar said:DRUGS BAD, DRUGS VERY BAD. DRUGS MAKE YOU STUPID. DRUGS DO NOT SOLVE STUFF, THEY MAKE STUFF WORSE.
The fundamental idea I'm trying to preach here is not 'take drugs' it's 'fuckin chill out'.
Sadness is perfectly acceptable, anger is the problem.microwaviblerabbit said:Well, considering his idea has already been applied to me. I was deemed too 'sad' for normal society. SO they arrested me and gave me happy pills. That made me more sad......so I got more pills. In fact, if they find out that I stop taking my pills, they can arrest me and force me to take them.
Yup. It's not like he's gonna try DOING anything, he's a lazy stoner.dantheman931 said:Wait just a fucking minute. Those who don't take drugs will succeed more than those who do... but you're advocating putting a pothead in charge of everything?riskroWe said:I agree with you. Don't take drugs and I'm sure you'll succeed in life much more than the potheads and the alcoholics. I'm being 100% sincere.effilctar said:DRUGS BAD, DRUGS VERY BAD. DRUGS MAKE YOU STUPID. DRUGS DO NOT SOLVE STUFF, THEY MAKE STUFF WORSE.
The fundamental idea I'm trying to preach here is not 'take drugs' it's 'fuckin chill out'.
I don't see how that's relevant...And incidentally, I'm part Jewish.
Dude are you on something? Every human has the right to be equal to each other. They may have differences sure, but at no point does that make one group greater then the next. No you can't force people to be all be the same. That's why socialism fails. I know that.riskroWe said:But the Jewish aren't equal to everyone else. The main difference, that which separates them from everyone else, is that they practice Judaism. :SAnd what's wrong with being equal. So circle back to what you said earlier. Is it wrong the Jewish are equal to everyone else? To you it is. Since Equality isdisgusting and unnatural
I mean they should be 'treated' equally, discrimination is horrible, but you can't force us all to be on the same level playing field. Not everybody is identical, to deny that is the height of ignorance. And to force everyone to be equal by helping the unfortunate and punishing the fortunate is discrimination in itself.
He is running it. He runs it by making sure everybody is calmly going about their business.[/quote]and for your next point. In a dictatorship that dictator MUST. MUST. MUST run it. It's all based on what he does. and if he does nothing then everything goes to shit in a week.
riskroWe said:what is wrong with you? You just say the Jewish aren't equal to everyone else and now you're just pissing him off?dantheman931 said:I don't see how that's relevant...And incidentally, I'm part Jewish.
... bro. <3
Well 'greater' depends on what you're referring to, doesn't it? No person is objectively better than another, but some people are better than others at certain things, yes?Kuchinawa212 said:Dude are you on something? Every human has the right to be equal to each other. They may have differences sure, but at no point does that make one group greater then the next. No you can't force people to be all be the same. That's why socialism fails. I know that.
Yes he keeps his nose out of financial and business affairs, because he's too lazy and stupid to run that sorta thing and he knows it.WHAT? You just finished saying that he keeps his nose out of it. That means he would either have no control what's so ever and we have no government at all or he is a ruling tyrant that keeps tabs on everyone and everything so that can strike down people that fall out of line. So what is it? And you can't have both.
You're the one who mentioned the jews, so I'm rolling with it. It applies just as well to women, tennis players, people who's name begins with T, and any other group of people you could possibly think of.what is wrong with you? You just say the Jewish aren't equal to everyone else and now you're just pissing him off?