I guess, but then I wonder why they only picked up the interest five years later.slowpoke999 said:I think anyone can become trainers whenever they want, just no sooner then ten, maybe these kids just picked up an interest later?danpascooch said:We're worried about the starters because of the fact that as of now there are only 5 new pokemon we know of, if two of them look absolutely "pants on head retarded" *gives Yahtzee a quarter* then that's two fifths of the new generation we know of. It doesn't bode well.Dr. Danger said:This concerns me as well. I don't see how this works since it's traditional for kids to start training Pokemon on their tenth birthday. It makes me wonder what they've been doing the past five years.danpascooch said:Seriously though, this whole "Your character is 15 years old" thing worries me.
Sure it's nice to have an older character, but won't that mean he's already been a trainer for FIVE YEARS!?
Every time I look back at the new starters, I get more excited. They've each endeared themselves to me entirely by now. All that's left is to see what Legendary comes with Black or White then stake my claim.
Why is everyone so worried about starters anyway? There will be other Pokemon in the game!
I imagine they'll either have some ruby/sapphire esque emergency that starts him off with pokemon, or they'll have him start like every other game and just ignore the canon contradictions.
i have to agree the 4th gen starters were in my opinion the best starters thought throughJohn Funk said:If you don't like a giant spiked turtle with a land mass on its back, a huge steel penguin, or a kung-fu monkey, I question your judgment.Hubilub said:...
And I thought Platinum had bad starter pokemon...
Shame on me for actually getting my hopes up about the Pokemon design.