SFMB said:
I'm just wondering, why EA won't release the game also in Steam? Surely, that would make them more money, even if people won't use their Origin-platform. Ubisoft is sadly adding their Uplay, but not trying to make their games available only through their inferior distribution system.
The Origin hate must cost them a lot of money, even if they have calculated tht in some point in the future of an alternative universe, Origin will be looked upon as a go-to-purhasing platform over Steam...
That's primarily the reason. They're holding out hope that Origin will one day stop sucking and overtake Steam as the DRM/Game Library of Choice for most players. But the problem isn't Origin, the problem is EA. They're a bunch of talentless hacks who represent literally everything that is wrong with the gaming industry right now. They're the first ones in line to fuck over customers for a buck, to implement harsh anti-consumer policies or "required game mechanics" (like how sim city had "required online play" despite, y'know, not) and shove thousands of dollars of low quality, shitty DLC down our throats. More than this, they actively ruin other companies by buying them out, forcing them to make lower quality games or games in genres they're completely unfamiliar with, and when those games end up sucking (big surprise?) they fire the whole dev team and chalk it up as a failed experiment.
This isn't your average group of idiots. They maliciously implement bullshit to make as much profit as they can, at the total expense of the customer. They outright lie, again and again, release incomplete, sub-par products and Origin is still more spyware than most people are able to accept (scroll up to the guy talking about sandboxing).
Comparing that to Steam is honestly ridiculous. It takes a hell of a lot of ignoring/conveniently forgetting company history to even BEGIN to think that Origin/EA is even close to as good/trustworthy as Steam/Valve. Pretty much the closest thing Valve has done to the bullshit EA has pulled is ruin TF2 with godawful hats and buy-only items (I guess if you played L4D hardcore back in the day, you might still be bitter about L4D2 like I am, but it wasn't a direct consumer fuck-over). Their game library service doesn't scan your PC. They've never bought out entire developers, fucked around forcing them to work on stupid projects, and then fired them all. The worst lies Valve tells are about release dates; they don't openly state that their recent release "requires online play" when it obviously doesn't, and continue insisting such for weeks until recanting under community pressure.
The big reason steam succeeded originally, and continues to succeed, is the trust built up with the community. When valve fucks up (which is rare), they're very open and honest about it. They're honest about their work environment, lack of rigid company structure, and what they think about making games. One of the hugest complaints about Steam for a year or two was lack of offline play, and they dove into that problem with both feet to get it solved as quickly as possible, and now that service is nearly flawless. It's obvious they care about the community - both their words and their actions show genuine good intent.
Comparing that company to EA is just silly. EA has lied repeatedly, year after year, even earning worst company of america awards (possibly unwarranted as I can think of a few "worse" companies, but it goes to show how little people think of them and their corporate practices). And EA's actions, time and again, show that they are far more interested in making a buck than earning anyone's trust. Origin is a shitty DRM software by itself, but that's not even the real issue. The issue is the company behind it is not trustworthy
at all. And when you're using their DRM service, you are putting your game library in their hands.
Would you seriously rather have EA holding your leash than Valve? If possible, no leash at all would be fantastic - but given the two options, one is
obviously superior. Fuck EA.